本报记者 广辉 为深入贯彻落实新时代司法改革要求，破解互联网司法实践难题，推动互联网法院（法庭）高质量发展，更好地服务数字经济发展与社会治理现代 化，2月5日—7日，由长春新区人民法院主办的新形势下互联网法院（法庭）发展路径研讨会在长春召开。杭州、北京、广州、成都、苏州等地互联网 法院（法庭）主要领导，长春新区管委会相关领导、抖音集团法律合作总监受邀列席，新区法院全体班子成员及相关部门负责人全程参与，共话互联 网司法创新实践，共商协同发展良策。 主旨发言环节，与会领导结合各自法院（法庭）工作实际逐一交流发言、分享实践成果，围绕互联网案件审理机制创新、智慧司法技术应用、跨区域 司法协同、数字法治人才培养等关键议题，提出具有针对性、前瞻性、可操作性的意见建议。新区法院分党组成员、副院长杨光阐述了人工智能与司 法审判的融合正从辅助走向全程赋能，未来应构建"数据中台+类案引擎"双轮驱动模式，实现"审理一案、治理一片"的效能提升。 自由研讨阶段，嘉宾们围绕会议主题，聚焦新形势下互联网司法面临的新情况、新问题，展开深入探讨、激烈交流，既有对过往工作的复盘总结，也 有对现存问题的深刻剖析，更有对未来发展的精准谋划。研讨会尾 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses significant changes in the jurisdiction of internet courts in China, effective from November 1, focusing on complex cases while removing simpler, repetitive cases from their purview [3][5]. Summary by Sections Changes in Jurisdiction - The Supreme Court has issued new regulations that expand the jurisdiction of internet courts in Beijing, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou to include four new types of cases: "network data," "personal information protection and privacy," "virtual property," and "unfair competition disputes" [3][5]. - Simultaneously, it removes simpler cases such as "financial loans," "small loan contract disputes," and certain "copyright disputes" from its jurisdiction, addressing the issue of overwhelming simple cases that consume judicial resources [3][5][6]. Historical Context and Issues - Initially, internet courts were established to explore online litigation rules, but the effectiveness of this mission has diminished as many courts can now conduct online hearings [6][10]. - The Beijing Internet Court reported handling 194,000 cases from its establishment in 2018 to July 2023, with a high concentration of simple cases, leading to a "case overload" issue [6][10]. Strategic Repositioning - Experts suggest that the recent adjustments are not merely minor tweaks but a strategic reconfiguration of the internet courts' functions, aiming to focus on complex and emerging digital economy-related disputes [6][9]. - The article emphasizes the need for dynamic adjustments in jurisdiction based on the maturity of case types and the necessity for rule exploration in new areas [7][9]. Future Directions - The internet courts are expected to evolve into "rule incubators" for governance in the digital space, addressing issues like data rights, platform economy, and algorithm governance [14][15]. - There is a call for establishing judicial review standards for platform rules, ensuring fairness and transparency in algorithmic decision-making [15][16]. - The article highlights the importance of maintaining judicial integrity while innovating procedural rules, ensuring that the rights of parties involved are not diminished [16].