Core Viewpoint - The ongoing public criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell by President Trump indicates a significant political challenge to the independence of the Federal Reserve, with Trump intensifying his attacks on Powell's interest rate policies and suggesting a potential replacement [2][4][10]. Group 1: Trump's Criticism and Strategy - Trump has publicly labeled Powell as a "numbskull" and criticized his appointment as one of his worst decisions, attributing rising housing costs to Powell's refusal to align with the White House's proposed interest rate cuts [4]. - The narrative being constructed by Trump positions Powell as responsible for economic issues, aiming to shift public perception and gain political leverage [4][10]. - Trump's approach this time is more organized and systematic compared to previous confrontations, utilizing various platforms to exert pressure on Powell and the Federal Reserve [8][10]. Group 2: Federal Reserve's Response - Powell has responded to the criticism by asserting the political motivations behind the attacks and emphasizing the non-political nature of the Federal Reserve [8]. - The Federal Reserve is expected to maintain a cautious stance in its policy statements, focusing on data-driven decisions to avoid direct confrontation with Trump [11]. - There is an anticipation that the Federal Reserve will seek support from Congress, particularly from Democrats, to reinforce its institutional independence amid the political pressure [11]. Group 3: Implications for Federal Reserve's Future - The ongoing conflict suggests a potential shift in the Federal Reserve's leadership, with Trump signaling a desire for a replacement before Powell's term ends in May 2026 [10]. - Possible candidates for Powell's successor include former Fed officials and current economic advisors, indicating a strategic consideration for future leadership [10]. - The current political climate raises concerns about the Federal Reserve's independence, with Trump aiming to intertwine personnel changes with institutional budgetary control [10].