值得注意的是，本案的被告方之一华夏幸福基业控股股份公司（简称"华夏控股"），是上市房企华夏幸 福的股东，持股比例为11.5%。而华夏控股的最大股东是北京东方银联投资管理有限公司，实控人为王 文学。 近日，天眼查信息显示，华夏控股新增一民事案件，原告为中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司、平安资产 管理有限责任公司，被告为王某、华夏幸福基业控股股份公司，案由为"申请确认仲裁协议效力"，12月 17日将在上海金融法院开庭。 据知情人士表示，前述"王某"即华夏控股的董事长王文学。 公开信息显示，本案涉及的"申请确认仲裁协议效力"，即当事人就仲裁协议效力问题有不同认识时，从 法律上由人民法院对仲裁协议的效力加以确认，以保护当事人的合法权益，对仲裁程序提供司法监督与 支持。 法院在审查仲裁协议效力时，主要针对以下因素：协议是否成立、是否具备缔约能力、是否以书面形式 订立、协议事项是否超出法定仲裁范围、是否胁迫迫使订立仲裁协议、是否有明确的仲裁机构、是否同 时选择了仲裁和诉讼。 截至目前，针对平安和华夏控股的具体仲裁事由，公司方面还未有回应。 近期，华夏控股旗下地产平台华夏幸福，正在筹划预重整工作。11月16日，华夏幸福发布公告 ...

Core Viewpoint - Nanjing Central Commercial Group Co., Ltd. is currently involved in an arbitration case regarding a lease contract dispute with Xuzhou Huirun Property Asset Management Co., Ltd. The company is seeking to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement in court, with the case yet to be heard [1] Group 1 - The arbitration was initiated by Xuzhou Huirun due to a dispute over the lease contract [1] - On September 16, 2025, the company applied to the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court in Jiangsu Province to confirm the effectiveness of the arbitration agreement and received a notice of acceptance on September 22 [1] - The company argues that the arbitration clause in the "Supplementary Agreement (II) to the Lease Contract" is ambiguous, constituting "either arbitration or litigation," and should be deemed invalid [1] Group 2 - The amount involved in the case is 51,995,000 yuan, and since the case has not been formally heard, the impact of the lease payments on the company's profits remains uncertain [1] - The company has reminded investors to be aware of the associated risks [1]