转自：视点 曾引起广泛关注的海底捞"小便门"，近日迎来一审判决。上海市黄埔区法院判决未成年人唐某及其父 母、吴某某及其父母向海底捞赔礼道歉，并赔偿各项损失共计220万元。 事情发生于今年2月，这两名17岁的未成年人在海底捞用餐之后，先后站上餐桌向火锅内小便，并且相 互拍摄视频。视频传至网络，引发舆论哗然。也对海底捞的品牌形象，构成了极大冲击。 当时为了尽可能降低对门店造成的负面影响，海底捞付出了不菲的代价。不仅将涉事门店的餐具全部销 毁换新、深度消毒，更对当日时间段消费的客户全额退还餐费，并进行订单付款金额的十倍补偿。 企业的快速反应，在一定程度避免了商誉受损。可是这无妄之灾，到底能不能讨回公道，成了一个很大 的疑问。 （红星新闻特约评论员 守一） 两名未成年人事后均被行政拘留。这固然体现了"违法必究"的原则，捍卫了公序良俗的底线，可是企业 商誉受损且付出了高昂的经济代价，这笔账怎么算？现在法院的裁决给了一个相对圆满的答案。 法院判决在保护未成年人隐私的前提下，当事人及父母在指定报刊上道歉，这是道德教育层面的应有之 义。而在经济损失赔偿方面，法院进行了量化：餐具损耗费和清洗消毒费13万元、经营损失和商誉损失 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving two minors urinating in a hot pot restaurant has led to significant legal and financial repercussions for the individuals involved and their guardians, highlighting the importance of social responsibility and the legal consequences of actions that harm a business's reputation and assets [1][4][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - In February 2025, two minors, Tang and Wu, urinated in a hot pot restaurant and filmed the act, which was later shared on social media, causing public outrage [2][3]. - The restaurant, Haidilao, responded by destroying all affected utensils, deep cleaning the establishment, and offering refunds and compensation to customers [3][4]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The Shanghai Huangpu District People's Court ruled that the minors and their parents must publicly apologize and pay a total of 2.2 million yuan (approximately 220,000 USD) in damages, which includes 130,000 yuan for utensil damage and cleaning costs, and 2 million yuan for business and reputation losses [4][6]. - The court found that the minors acted with intent and were aware of the potential consequences of their actions, thus holding them accountable despite their status as minors [5][6]. Group 3: Expert Opinions - Legal experts emphasized the responsibility of guardians in supervising minors and instilling social values, as well as the necessity for businesses to be protected from unlawful interference that could harm their operations [7]. - The ruling serves as a reminder that actions by minors can lead to civil liability, and the requirement for public apologies aims to restore the affected business's reputation [7].

一段1200万次播放的视频，一张40万元的赔偿单，百万粉丝网红在法院判决中重新认识了网络言论的法 律边界。 2025年5月28日，许昌市魏都区人民法院的法庭内座无虚席，人大代表、政协委员、媒体记者和企业代 表的目光聚焦在审判席。当法官当庭宣布"段某赔偿许昌市胖东来商贸集团有限公司（以下简称'胖东 来'）各项经济损失共计40万元"时，一场持续近四个月的"红内裤风波"终于有了法律定论。 这起案件始于2025年1月30日：抖音网红"两个小段"（段某）爆料胖东来生活广场，称其购买的女士红 色内裤出现掉色问题，穿着后出现过敏现象。 面对投诉，胖东来迅速行动：员工陪同段某就医并支付1144.13元医疗费，给予500元建议奖（被拒）， 2月2日将问题商品下架，2月4日更扩大下架范围至案涉品牌全系列商品及其他深色内衣裤、袜子等产 品。 然而就在2月4日，段某通过拥有5万粉丝的抖音账号"两个小段（小）"发布视频，对胖东来商品品质和 服务行为作出贬损性评价，称涉案红色女士内裤品质存在问题并致其过敏。 该视频迅速发酵，播放量高达1217万次，点赞11.3万，评论4.2万。 40万赔偿背后的法律逻辑 40万元赔偿金引发网络热议，这一 ...