Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of organizational structure in disaster management and crisis leadership, highlighting the gap between management and frontline employees as a critical issue [1][4][12] - Companies must reassess their disaster preparedness frameworks, focusing on internal reporting and governance structures rather than solely on training and communication [1][4][12] Group 1: Organizational Structure - A well-designed organizational structure is crucial for effective disaster preparedness, as deficiencies in structure often lead to poor performance in crisis situations [1][2] - Many companies lack dedicated executive positions for safety, indicating a low prioritization of safety and disaster preparedness within management [3][4] - The absence of safety personnel in board discussions reflects a broader neglect of safety issues, which can lead to inadequate resource allocation and prioritization [4][6] Group 2: Communication Channels - The frequency of meetings between CEOs and safety officers is often minimal, suggesting that safety is not viewed as a core business function [6][7] - Limiting communication channels for safety personnel can hinder their effectiveness and influence within the organization [7][8] - Effective communication and integration of safety roles into the management structure are essential for a proactive approach to disaster preparedness [8][9] Group 3: Integration of Safety Roles - Companies are increasingly appointing various chief officers (e.g., Chief Security Officer, Chief Information Security Officer) to address different threats, but without proper integration, these roles may not effectively contribute to overall safety [10][11] - A unified approach to safety management, where a designated leader oversees all safety-related functions, can enhance preparedness and response capabilities [10][11] - The lack of a cohesive strategy can lead to significant vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, which highlighted the need for comprehensive oversight of potential risks [11][12]