2026.02.04 本文字数：825，阅读时长大约1分钟 老牌房企高管"卷"入腐败疑云。 2月3日盘后，港资地产商新鸿基地产 （00016.HK） 发布公告，称因健康问题，冯秀炎已辞任公司执行 董事一职，自2月3日起生效。 据《国际金融报》，在此之前，已有多家香港媒体报道，称冯秀炎（Maureen Feng）已于2026年1月底 被停职，原因是与上海环贸IAPM商场营销活动招标、广告投放等业务环节的贪腐调查有关。 新鸿基地产对此表示"关于近日媒体报道提及的有关事项，新地正进行检视并会作出适当跟进"。昨日， 有新鸿基地产内部人士曾表示"对冯秀炎公司内部尚未发布通知"。 信息显示，冯秀炎于1991年加入新鸿基地产，此后一路晋升，日常主要负责新鸿基地产在香港、上海、 南京、北京及杭州多个主要商场的策略性规划、发展及管理，包括上海环贸IAPM、上海国金中心 IFC、南京IFC等核心商业项目。 爱企查App显示，冯秀炎是上海环贸广场房地产有限公司的法人代表及董事长、新鸿基国金中心房地产 （南京）有限公司的法人代表及董事，在集团旗下数个公司担任负责人。 | Q 爱企查 V882&MLRS | | 童老板▼ 冯秀炎 | ...

Core Points - The article discusses the corruption and misconduct of a financial manager in a company, highlighting the various ways he exploited his position for personal gain [1][7][87] - It emphasizes the lack of internal controls and oversight within the company, which allowed the financial manager to operate with impunity for an extended period [90][91] Group 1: Financial Misconduct - The financial manager was involved in various corrupt practices, including falsifying procurement costs and manipulating project margins to inflate profits [17][26][30] - He engaged in a scheme where he altered customer requirements to increase reported costs, thereby creating a discrepancy between actual and reported expenses [27][32] - The manager also misappropriated company funds by failing to return bid deposits, which he kept in his personal account for years [66][68] Group 2: Procurement and Inventory Issues - The company lacked a proper inventory management system, making it difficult to track the actual goods procured and delivered to clients [48][52] - The financial manager took advantage of this by reporting inflated costs for goods that were either not delivered or were of lower quality than reported [39][54] - The procurement process was poorly documented, allowing for significant manipulation without detection [41][90] Group 3: Internal Control Failures - The article highlights that despite having formal management systems in place, the company's internal controls were ineffective, leading to significant blind spots [90][91] - The financial manager's dual role in multiple functions contributed to the lack of accountability and oversight, which is a common issue in many organizations [91][92] - The overall management structure allowed for a culture of corruption to flourish, as the financial manager was able to operate without scrutiny [88][89]