伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐25日抵达瑞士日内瓦，准备次日与美国代表就伊朗核计划举行第三轮间接谈判。 当天早些时候，阿拉格齐反驳了美方所谓伊朗正在研发能打到美国的远程导弹的说法。 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社报道，阿拉格齐率领的伊朗代表团当晚抵达日内瓦，将于26日与美国总统特 朗普的特使威特科夫、女婿库什纳举行间接会谈，斡旋方阿曼继续居中传话。 据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社早前报道，阿拉格齐当天接受《今日印度》报采访时表示，特朗普24日发表国情咨 文演讲时声称伊朗"正在研制很快能打到美国的导弹"，此类说法是"假新闻"，特朗普是"假新闻"的受害 者。 阿拉格齐表示，伊朗有意将导弹射程限制在2000公里以内。伊朗导弹计划纯粹用于防御和威慑，而非构 成全球威胁。他以去年6月伊朗与以色列的冲突举例，指责以色列和美国挑起这场战争，迫使伊朗进行 自卫。他表示，伊朗将继续维持防御能力。 伊朗和美国本月6日和17日相继在阿曼首都马斯喀特和瑞士日内瓦举行两轮间接谈判。与此同时，美国 继续在中东地区大规模集结兵力。美国总统特朗普近日承认，他考虑对伊朗进行"有限军事打击"，以迫 使伊朗就范。 资讯编辑：沈一冰 021-26093395 资讯监督：乐卫扬 ...

【环球时报综合报道】伊朗外交部25日驳斥了美国关于其导弹计划的说法，称其为"弥天大谎"。据法新社报道，美国总统特朗普24日称，德黑兰 正在研发能够打击美国本土的导弹。 据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社报道，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃25日在社交媒体X上发文称，美国和以色列关于伊朗核计划、伊朗弹道导弹以及伊朗骚乱事 件伤亡人数等一切指控，不过是一系列"弥天大谎"的重复。巴加埃称，职业说谎者在制造"真相幻觉"方面有着特殊专长，任何人都不应被这样的 谎言所欺骗。 法新社称，巴加埃虽未具体说明他回应的是美方的哪些说法，但就在数小时前，特朗普称伊朗正寻求研制能打到美国本土的导弹。本月早些时 候，伊朗外长阿拉格齐在接受卡塔尔半岛电视台采访时称，伊朗目前尚不具备打击美国本土的能力，但如果美方发动袭击，伊朗将攻击美国在中 东地区的军事基地。 特朗普在24日的国情咨文演讲中还重申，美国绝不会允许伊朗研发核武器，称伊朗领导人 "此刻正再次图谋其险恶的核野心"。伊朗多次否认谋求 核武器，但坚称其有权将核技术用于和平目的。特朗普还表示，伊朗方面希望达成协议，但美国尚未听到相关"秘密承诺"。据报道，美伊定于26 日在瑞士日内瓦举行第三轮会谈。阿拉格齐就 ...

新华社德黑兰2月25日电（记者 沙达提 陈霄）伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐25日抵达瑞士日内瓦，准备次 日与美国代表就伊朗核计划举行第三轮间接谈判。当天早些时候，阿拉格齐反驳了美方所谓伊朗正在研 发能打到美国的远程导弹的说法。 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社报道，阿拉格齐率领的伊朗代表团当晚抵达日内瓦，将于26日与美国总 统特朗普的特使威特科夫、女婿库什纳举行间接会谈，斡旋方阿曼继续居中传话。 据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社早前报道，阿拉格齐当天接受《今日印度》报采访时表示，特朗普24日发表国 情咨文演讲时声称伊朗"正在研制很快能打到美国的导弹"，此类说法是"假新闻"，特朗普是"假新闻"的 受害者。 阿拉格齐表示，伊朗有意将导弹射程限制在2000公里以内。伊朗导弹计划纯粹用于防御和威慑，而 非构成全球威胁。他以去年6月伊朗与以色列的冲突举例，指责以色列和美国挑起这场战争，迫使伊朗 进行自卫。他表示，伊朗将继续维持防御能力。 伊朗和美国本月6日和17日相继在阿曼首都马斯喀特和瑞士日内瓦举行两轮间接谈判。与此同时， 美国继续在中东地区大规模集结兵力。美国总统特朗普近日承认，他考虑对伊朗进行"有限军事打击"， 以迫使伊朗就范。 ...

据伊朗迈赫尔通讯社早前报道，阿拉格齐当天接受《今日印度》报采访时表示，特朗普24日发表国情咨 文演讲时声称伊朗"正在研制很快能打到美国的导弹"，此类说法是"假新闻"，特朗普是"假新闻"的受害 者。 阿拉格齐表示，伊朗有意将导弹射程限制在2000公里以内。伊朗导弹计划纯粹用于防御和威慑，而非构 成全球威胁。他以去年6月伊朗与以色列的冲突举例，指责以色列和美国挑起这场战争，迫使伊朗进行 自卫。他表示，伊朗将继续维持防御能力。 伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐25日抵达瑞士日内瓦，准备次日与美国代表就伊朗核计划举行第三轮间接谈判。 当天早些时候，阿拉格齐反驳了美方所谓伊朗正在研发能打到美国的远程导弹的说法。 伊朗和美国本月6日和17日相继在阿曼首都马斯喀特和瑞士日内瓦举行两轮间接谈判。与此同时，美国 继续在中东地区大规模集结兵力。美国总统特朗普近日承认，他考虑对伊朗进行"有限军事打击"，以迫 使伊朗就范。 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社报道，阿拉格齐率领的伊朗代表团当晚抵达日内瓦，将于26日与美国总统特 朗普的特使威特科夫、女婿库什纳举行间接会谈，斡旋方阿曼继续居中传话。 （文章来源：新华社） ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between U.S. President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu focused on Iran, Gaza, and the Middle East situation, with Netanyahu aiming to influence U.S.-Iran negotiations and increase demands on Iran [1][3]. Group 1: U.S.-Israel Relations - Netanyahu's visit to the U.S. was perceived as an attempt to sway U.S. negotiations with Iran, emphasizing Israel's security needs and the importance of close coordination between the two nations [3][5]. - The Israeli stance is that any agreement between the U.S. and Iran must ensure that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons and must limit its missile capabilities and support for regional proxies [4][5]. Group 2: U.S.-Iran Negotiations - The U.S. and Iran have engaged in indirect negotiations, but key issues remain unresolved, particularly Iran's uranium enrichment and missile program [3][4]. - Iran has expressed willingness to discuss its uranium enrichment levels under the condition that its rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty are respected, indicating a potential for negotiation but with significant caveats [4]. Group 3: Military Considerations - The U.S. continues to apply military pressure on Iran, with the deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group in the Middle East, and considerations for sending a second carrier strike group [6]. - Analysts suggest that the U.S. military buildup may serve dual purposes: to pressure Iran into negotiations or to prepare for potential military action if negotiations fail [6].

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between US President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu focused on Iran, Gaza, and the Middle East situation, with Netanyahu aiming to influence US-Iran negotiations and increase demands on Iran [1][13]. Group 1: Meeting Details - The closed-door meeting lasted approximately three hours, with no media presence or joint statement issued [3][15]. - Trump emphasized the US's preference for continuing negotiations with Iran, while Netanyahu highlighted Israel's security needs and the importance of close coordination between the two nations [5][17]. Group 2: Negotiation Dynamics - Netanyahu's primary goal was to push for a broader agreement that extends beyond Iran's nuclear program, expressing dissatisfaction with the current state of US-Iran negotiations [5][18]. - Israeli media reported that Netanyahu's agenda included ensuring any agreement would prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and limit its missile capabilities [6][18]. Group 3: Military Considerations - There are speculations that the meeting may have also been about coordinating military actions in case negotiations fail [2][21]. - The US has increased military presence in the Middle East, with the deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, indicating a readiness for potential military action against Iran [12][23]. Group 4: Broader Implications - Analysts suggest that while there are subtle differences in the negotiation approach between the US and Israel, there is no fundamental conflict in their positions [21]. - The ongoing military pressure from the US may serve as a backdrop to negotiations, with some experts arguing that the talks could be a facade for justifying military intervention [23].

Core Viewpoint - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's upcoming meeting with President Trump is primarily focused on discussing Iran, emphasizing the need for negotiations to include restrictions on Iran's ballistic missile program and its support for regional proxies [1][2]. Group 1: Meeting Details - Netanyahu is scheduled to meet Trump on November 11 in Washington, marking his seventh visit to the U.S. since Trump took office [1]. - The meeting is not expected to be open to the media, and there are no plans for a joint press conference, although this could change [2]. - Netanyahu's visit is tightly scheduled, arriving in the U.S. on November 10 and returning on November 12 after the meeting [3]. Group 2: Israeli Concerns - Netanyahu aims to persuade Trump not to sign any agreement that does not address Israel's core interests, particularly regarding Iran's missile capabilities and support for militant groups [2][4]. - There are concerns that Iran's missile program could eventually threaten not only Israel but also the U.S. [2]. - Netanyahu plans to present the latest intelligence on Iran's nuclear and missile programs, as well as its support for terrorist organizations [3]. Group 3: Diplomatic Context - Iran has warned that Netanyahu's visit could negatively impact the diplomatic process, accusing Israel of undermining peace efforts [2]. - Netanyahu's direct dialogue with Trump may stem from doubts about the effectiveness of Trump's advisors in handling negotiations related to Hamas and Palestine [4]. - The meeting is seen as a strategic move for Netanyahu, allowing him to either take credit if Trump decides to take action against Iran or to show that he has made efforts if no action is taken [4].

Core Viewpoint - Iran and the United States are in agreement on the necessity of continuing negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program, although specific dates for the next round of talks have not been established [1][2]. Group 1: Negotiation Status - Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif stated that while the current round of negotiations is a good start, there is still a long way to go in building trust [1]. - Zarif emphasized that negotiations must occur without threats or pressure, and he hopes the U.S. will adopt a similar approach [1]. - Both Iran and the U.S. have agreed to continue discussions, with the next meeting to be arranged after mutual consultations [2]. Group 2: Nuclear and Missile Programs - Zarif asserted that the Iranian nuclear issue can only be resolved through negotiations, and Iran is prepared to reach an agreement that addresses concerns related to uranium enrichment [1]. - He made it clear that the issue of banning uranium enrichment is non-negotiable, stating that it is Iran's right to continue this process [1]. - Zarif also indicated that Iran's missile program is fundamentally defensive and will not be included in negotiations [1]. Group 3: Military Preparedness - Zarif mentioned that the possibility of war always exists, and Iran is prepared for such a scenario [1]. - He clarified that while Iran cannot attack the U.S. mainland, it would target U.S. military bases in the Middle East if attacked [1]. - Zarif distinguished between attacking military bases and neighboring countries, asserting that Iran would not attack its neighbors [1].

Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around the ongoing negotiations between the US and Iran regarding a potential nuclear agreement, with discussions about the location and format of the talks [1][2] - Iran's President has instructed the Foreign Minister to engage in "fair and just negotiations" with the US, emphasizing that the talks should align with Iran's national interests [2] - The US administration, while pursuing diplomatic efforts, has indicated that military options remain on the table if negotiations fail, highlighting the tense atmosphere surrounding the talks [3] Group 2 - Israel has set forth three conditions for any agreement with Iran: no development of nuclear programs, no ballistic missile development, and no support for regional proxies [4] - The focus of the negotiations is primarily on Iran's nuclear program, with Iran expressing no intention to transfer enriched uranium abroad, despite potential concessions [5][6] - There are indications that the US may also seek to address Iran's missile capabilities in the negotiations, although Iran insists that discussions should be limited to nuclear issues [6][7] Group 3 - Recent military tensions have escalated, with the US military shooting down an Iranian drone in the Arabian Sea and Iranian vessels approaching a US-flagged oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz [8][10] - The US military reported that the drone was approaching the USS Abraham Lincoln, and there were no injuries or damage to US equipment during the incident [9] - Iran has claimed that a vessel entered its territorial waters illegally, asserting that it requested navigation permits from the ship, which did not comply [10]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that negotiations between the US and Iran regarding a potential nuclear agreement are facing changes in location and format, with Iran requesting a shift to Oman for bilateral talks instead of Istanbul with multiple countries involved [1][3][21] - The US White House confirmed that the talks are still planned to occur as scheduled despite Iran's request for changes [3][25] - Military tensions have escalated with the US military shooting down an Iranian drone in the Arabian Sea and Iranian vessels approaching a US oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz [5][9][29] Group 2 - Iran's Foreign Ministry indicated that the negotiation plans are set, with discussions expected to take place in the coming days, and the location is still under negotiation [5][25] - The upcoming talks, if realized, would mark the first face-to-face meeting between senior officials from the US and Iran since the US airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025 [5][25] - Iran's President has instructed the Foreign Minister to engage in "fair and just negotiations" with the US, emphasizing that the talks should align with Iran's national interests [10][32] Group 3 - The US military reported that an Iranian drone was shot down while approaching the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, which was operating approximately 500 miles from the Iranian coast [7][27] - Following the drone incident, Iranian vessels threatened to board a US-flagged oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting a US naval response to ensure the tanker’s safety [9][29] - Iran's officials claimed that the vessel was illegally entering Iranian waters and had been warned before leaving [9][29] Group 4 - The Israeli Prime Minister met with a US envoy to discuss Iran, expressing distrust in Iran's commitments and emphasizing the need for stringent conditions in any agreement [14][34] - The US President has reiterated military options remain on the table if diplomatic efforts fail, indicating a readiness for potential military action against Iran [15][37] - Israel has outlined three conditions for any agreement with Iran, focusing on halting nuclear development, missile programs, and support for regional proxies [37][39] Group 5 - Reports suggest Iran may be willing to make significant concessions regarding its nuclear program, including potentially transferring enriched uranium to Russia, although this has been denied by Iranian officials [19][39] - The US appears to be maintaining its demands to limit Iran's missile capabilities alongside nuclear discussions, indicating a dual-track negotiation approach [20][40] - Iranian officials have stated that discussions should focus solely on the nuclear program, rejecting any talks on missile projects [20][40]