Group 1 - The 2025 Service Trade Fair concluded with significant achievements, including 9 thematic exhibitions, 13 keynote forums, 81 specialized forums, and 75 negotiation sessions, with nearly 2,000 offline exhibitors and about 5,600 online exhibitors, resulting in over 900 outcomes in fields such as construction, information technology, and finance [1][2] - The fair attracted participation from over 60 countries, more than 20 international organizations, nearly 800 domestic and foreign guests, and over 480 Fortune 500 and industry-leading companies, highlighting its evolution from a simple industry exhibition to a "future service ecosystem" [1][2] - The fair reflects China's transition in service trade from "following" to "leading," showcasing a comprehensive upgrade from "physical" to "digital intelligence" [1][2] Group 2 - The transformation of the fair signifies a shift in focus from merely attracting foreign products and technologies to Chinese enterprises exporting their "AI+" models, energy solutions, and digital supply chain innovations [2] - The discourse surrounding the fair has evolved from broad themes of "openness" and "innovation" to specific drivers such as "digital" and "green," indicating a shift towards global concerns and new pathways in service trade [2] - China's service trade has achieved a historic leap, with trade volume increasing from $482.9 billion in 2012 to over $1 trillion projected for 2024, marking a significant qualitative change and positioning China as a crucial engine for global trade growth [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The national unified carbon market has established a dual-driven structure of mandatory carbon market and voluntary carbon market, with continuous expansion in trading scale and the development of a governance system where "carbon emissions have costs, and carbon reductions have benefits" [1] Group 1: Current Market Structure - The carbon market has developed into a dual structure consisting of a mandatory carbon emissions trading market and a voluntary greenhouse gas reduction trading market [1] - The trading scale is continuously expanding, indicating a growing demand for professional services related to carbon markets [1] Group 2: Challenges in Professional Services - Market demand has not been fully released due to limited coverage of the mandatory carbon market and a lack of strong willingness among enterprises to manage quotas effectively [2] - There is an uneven development of professional services, with some areas like calibration and verification being more mature than others such as carbon asset management and project development consulting [2] - The entry barriers in many service areas are low or unclear, leading to inconsistent service quality among institutions [2] Group 3: Opportunities for Growth - The transition towards a greener and low-carbon economy presents significant opportunities for the development of carbon market-related professional services [3] - Recommendations include enhancing industry support policies, expanding the scale of both mandatory and voluntary carbon markets, and fostering a robust ecosystem for low-carbon services [3] Group 4: Institutional Development - There is a need to cultivate a diverse matrix of service institutions to meet the varied demands of the carbon market and prevent homogenization of services [4] - Institutions should focus on upgrading their services in energy conservation, inspection, certification, and information technology to expand into carbon-related services [4] Group 5: Service Diversification - Emphasis on combining "soft services" and "hard services" to enhance the quality and diversity of professional services [4] - Development of new service scenarios such as carbon trading consultants and carbon financial advisors is encouraged to meet the evolving needs of the market [4] Group 6: Regulatory Mechanisms - Establishment of a comprehensive regulatory mechanism is essential to ensure the quality and standards of professional services in the carbon market [5][6] - Regular evaluations and the publication of service institution lists can help improve service quality and foster public oversight [6]