叶牛平强调，2025年和"十四五"时期西安高质量发展成效显著，解决了一批制约发展关键问题、历 史遗留问题和群众反映强烈问题，形成了一批有利于高质量内涵式可持续发展的基础制度和基本秩序， 总体实现"十四五"圆满收官。2026年要谋定目标加油干，强化"西部示范、西安先行"的使命担当，苦练 内功、夯实基础、全面发力、精准突破，坚决有力推进全域治理、全链创新、全面改革，不断提升西安 特大城市发展能级和核心竞争力，推动"十五五"良好开局。莲湖区作为中心城区，要遵循城市发展规律 和资源禀赋特点，不断提高综合治理能力，在推进城市更新、产业升级、民生保障、社会治理等方面走 在前、作示范。 2月27日，市长叶牛平参加市十七届人大七次会议莲湖代表团审议政府工作报告，听取意见建议。 市委常委、副市长孟浩参加审议。 代表们踊跃发言，气氛热烈。毛继东、周建玲、栗凯、李冰、吕喆、仁钦扎木苏、乔备战等7位代 表发言，大家一致认为，政府工作报告总结成绩实事求是，提出的"十五五"发展目标鼓舞人心，安排 2026年工作务实精准，充分体现了有为政府的能力和担当。叶牛平边听边记，与代表深入交流探讨。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised "Nanjing Water and Soil Conservation Measures" reflects a shift in the approach to water and soil conservation in a major city, moving from strict control to a more resilient system of guidance and value activation [1][2]. Approval Process Changes - The approval process for projects has been streamlined, allowing for a "notification commitment system" for projects in 22 completed regional assessments, reducing the approval time from 10 working days to immediate processing [2]. - This change has enabled 22 projects to commence with a total saving of 80 working days, indicating a shift in management focus from pre-approval to ongoing supervision [2]. Comprehensive Governance - The new measures emphasize "comprehensive governance" rather than limiting the scope to designated key areas, advocating for unified planning and systematic governance across various ecological components [2]. - Nanjing has established over 150 ecological clean small watersheds, covering more than 55% of the area, integrating water system management, pollution prevention, and rural landscape enhancement [3]. Ecological Value Transformation - Innovative practices in ecological value transformation have emerged, such as the successful monetization of ecological products in the Daqin small watershed, with a transaction value of 23.72 million yuan [3]. - The new regulations include provisions for exploring the valuation, trading, and transformation mechanisms of water and soil conservation ecological products, aiming to attract broader social capital participation [3]. Legislative Changes - The revision of local regulations aims to reduce burdens on grassroots governance, remove qualification thresholds for monitoring units, and update the terminology from "sustainable development" to "high-quality development" [4]. - These changes reflect a commitment to maintaining every inch of water and soil, as seen in the evolving green landscape of the hilly areas [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing "key small matters" that affect people's livelihoods, highlighting the need for effective supervision and problem-solving mechanisms to enhance public trust and satisfaction [5][18]. Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - The article discusses the implementation of a mechanism that allows for direct engagement with the public to gather their concerns, focusing on social assistance, agricultural policies, and infrastructure development [2][15]. - It stresses the need for a problem-oriented approach, concentrating on urgent issues that the public is most concerned about, such as rural revitalization, education, healthcare, and environmental safety [4][6]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - The article highlights the importance of collaboration among various departments to ensure effective supervision and problem resolution, advocating for a system that integrates feedback from the public into governance [13][14]. - It mentions the necessity of establishing a closed-loop governance mechanism to address persistent issues and improve the overall effectiveness of public service [16][18]. Group 3: Focus on Public Concerns - The article underscores the significance of identifying and addressing the specific concerns of the public, using data-driven approaches to analyze and prioritize issues that require immediate attention [10][18]. - It points out that seemingly minor issues often reflect deeper systemic problems and should be treated with the same urgency as larger issues [11][20]. Group 4: Continuous Improvement - The article advocates for ongoing evaluation and adjustment of strategies to ensure that the measures taken are effective and responsive to the public's needs, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in governance [12][14]. - It encourages a proactive stance in supervision, where officials actively seek out and address public grievances rather than waiting for complaints to arise [20][21].