民生监督
Search documents
我为群众办实事丨化解不动产“登记难”
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-11-20 00:30
Core Insights - The article highlights the successful resolution of property registration issues faced by homeowners in Qianshan City, Anhui Province, emphasizing the effective collaboration among various government departments to address historical challenges in property rights registration [1][2] Group 1: Problem Identification and Resolution - Homeowners in the Minggui Mansion community received their property rights certificates after years of difficulty due to historical issues affecting 18 households [1] - The Qianshan City Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission identified the property registration difficulties as a key issue during their investigation into public concerns and prioritized it for resolution [1] Group 2: Government Actions and Coordination - The city’s Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission implemented a management system to track the resolution of the property registration issue, sending reminders to relevant departments to ensure accountability and set deadlines for completion [1] - The Natural Resources and Planning Bureau's property registration center coordinated with tax authorities and financial institutions to resolve issues related to land mortgages and tax payments, facilitating smoother property registration processes [1] Group 3: Ongoing Improvements and Digital Transformation - The Qianshan City Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission established a dynamic inspection mechanism to systematically address historical property registration issues and improve public satisfaction [2] - The property registration center is encouraged to continue digital reforms, utilizing "Internet + Property Registration" to enhance efficiency in certificate issuance, with 102 property registration issues resolved this year alone [2]
学纪知纪明纪守纪丨把“关键小事”办到群众心坎上
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-11-19 00:05
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing "key small matters" that affect people's livelihoods, highlighting the need for effective supervision and problem-solving mechanisms to enhance public trust and satisfaction [5][18]. Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - The article discusses the implementation of a mechanism that allows for direct engagement with the public to gather their concerns, focusing on social assistance, agricultural policies, and infrastructure development [2][15]. - It stresses the need for a problem-oriented approach, concentrating on urgent issues that the public is most concerned about, such as rural revitalization, education, healthcare, and environmental safety [4][6]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts - The article highlights the importance of collaboration among various departments to ensure effective supervision and problem resolution, advocating for a system that integrates feedback from the public into governance [13][14]. - It mentions the necessity of establishing a closed-loop governance mechanism to address persistent issues and improve the overall effectiveness of public service [16][18]. Group 3: Focus on Public Concerns - The article underscores the significance of identifying and addressing the specific concerns of the public, using data-driven approaches to analyze and prioritize issues that require immediate attention [10][18]. - It points out that seemingly minor issues often reflect deeper systemic problems and should be treated with the same urgency as larger issues [11][20]. Group 4: Continuous Improvement - The article advocates for ongoing evaluation and adjustment of strategies to ensure that the measures taken are effective and responsive to the public's needs, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in governance [12][14]. - It encourages a proactive stance in supervision, where officials actively seek out and address public grievances rather than waiting for complaints to arise [20][21].
推动派驻监督从有形覆盖向有效覆盖提升
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-09-17 00:30
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of supervisory mechanisms in enhancing the effectiveness of political and public oversight within the cultural and ideological sectors in Guangxi, China Group 1: Political Supervision - The supervisory body prioritizes the implementation of Xi Jinping's important speeches and directives as a key political task, establishing a tracking and supervision mechanism to ensure compliance with central government policies [1] - A quarterly "political health check" is conducted in seven comprehensive supervisory units to assess the implementation of responsibilities by party organizations [1] - Proactive measures include warning talks with over 20 individuals and delaying promotions for three individuals due to emerging issues [1] Group 2: Collaborative Supervision - The supervisory body addresses weaknesses in supervisory strength and professionalism by implementing a collaborative supervision mechanism, enhancing coordination among various supervisory groups [2] - Regular joint meetings are held to analyze issues and develop solutions, transforming the approach from isolated efforts to collaborative operations [2] - The "Qingfeng Village" app is utilized for real-time monitoring of cultural benefit funds, leading to the identification and rectification of 15 issues [2] Group 3: Public Supervision - A problem-oriented approach is adopted to ensure that public concerns are addressed, utilizing various channels to gather feedback on pressing issues [3] - A problem ledger is established, with clear responsibilities and deadlines for resolution, involving community representatives in evaluating the effectiveness of rectifications [3] - Specific actions taken include addressing off-campus training issues and conducting field research in rural cultural facilities to enhance resource management and utilization [3] Group 4: Digital Empowerment - The supervisory body is advancing big data supervision by developing an intelligent monitoring platform for project funding in the cultural sector, enabling online oversight of the entire process [4] - Since the platform's launch, over 50 projects have been monitored online, resulting in 12 warning alerts and the correction of 8 deviations [4] - A risk warning mechanism is established for key processes, with over 30 potential risk points identified and more than 50 preventive measures formulated [5] Group 5: Cultural Integrity - The promotion of a culture of integrity is integrated into daily supervision, focusing on the unique characteristics of cultural and ideological units [5] - Initiatives include the creation and performance of integrity-themed artistic productions, reaching over 15,000 audience members [5] - Educational efforts are made through warning sessions and case studies to enhance the awareness of discipline and regulations among staff [5]