Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the emergence of a black market in education, where certain institutions exploit parental anxiety by promoting pseudoscientific concepts related to "whole brain development" and "neuroscience" for profit [2][3][4]. Group 1: Pseudoscientific Practices - Some educational institutions use outdated theories like "left and right brain division" to market their courses, employing gimmicks such as "blindfold reading" and "5-minute poetry memorization" to create myths [2][3]. - Claims that flashcard training can enable children to have photographic memory are unfounded, as they contradict basic cognitive principles [2][3]. - The notion of developing "super abilities" in children through these methods is fundamentally flawed and lacks scientific backing [3][4]. Group 2: Impact on Children - The mechanical stimulation from rapid flashcard sessions can harm the fragile cognitive systems of young children, rather than aiding their intellectual development [3]. - Excessive focus on rote memorization and abstract cognition deprives children of opportunities to engage with the world naturally, stifling their creativity and imagination [3][4]. - The pursuit of "superior intelligence" through these programs promotes a distorted value system that undermines genuine educational growth [3][4]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics - A complete black market chain exists, with unqualified teachers and counterfeit "international certification courses" being common [4]. - Educational tools, such as "brainwave headphones" and "smart storybooks," are sold at exorbitant prices despite their low production costs [4]. - Social media influencers contribute to this issue by promoting pseudoscience as replicable success formulas, exploiting parents' fears of missing critical developmental windows [4]. Group 4: Regulatory Recommendations - There is a need for systemic reforms to address these issues, including the establishment of a negative list for educational advertising to regulate false claims [4]. - Educational authorities should collaborate with research institutions to create guidelines that prohibit teaching methods that violate developmental principles [4]. - Parents must develop a rational understanding of cognitive development, recognizing that any training beyond a child's current capabilities poses significant risks [4][5]. Group 5: Reflection on Educational Values - The article emphasizes that the history of educational speculation shows that all unscientific educational myths will eventually collapse [5]. - It calls for a reevaluation of the belief in shortcuts to genius, advocating for a healthy educational evaluation system that respects individual growth [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the prevalence of dubious "whole brain development" educational programs targeting parents' financial resources, claiming to enhance children's intelligence through unproven methods [1][6][9]. Group 1: Overview of Whole Brain Development Claims - Various institutions claim that "whole brain education" can significantly enhance children's cognitive abilities, suggesting that every newborn has the potential comparable to Einstein [1][2]. - Techniques such as flashcard teaching are employed to purportedly improve children's memory and information processing speed, although many parents express skepticism about their effectiveness [3][4]. Group 2: Criticism and Lack of Scientific Support - Experts argue that claims of "super sensory" abilities and "right brain development" lack scientific backing and do not align with human perception principles [8][9]. - The concept of "whole brain development" is criticized as being overly simplistic and misleading, often driven by market interests rather than scientific evidence [6][9]. Group 3: Market Regulation and Professional Standards - The article emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and standards in the educational market to prevent unqualified individuals from teaching these programs [5][10]. - Experts call for the cultivation of professionals in educational neuroscience to ensure that teaching methods are scientifically validated and recognized by regulatory bodies [10][11].

Group 1 - The concept of "whole brain development" is heavily marketed by various educational institutions, claiming to enhance children's cognitive abilities significantly, such as increasing concentration by 5 to 10 times and memory by 20 times [1][2] - Many of these institutions promote extraordinary claims, such as the ability to read 6000 words per minute, which raises skepticism about the validity of these assertions [1][2] - Despite the lack of scientific backing for these claims, the market for such products and services continues to thrive, driven by parents' desire to give their children a competitive edge [2][3] Group 2 - The commercialization of "whole brain development" often leads to a focus on financial gain rather than genuine cognitive enhancement, raising ethical concerns about the motivations behind these programs [2][3] - There is a significant regulatory gap in overseeing these educational institutions, as they do not fall under traditional educational regulations, making it difficult to assess the scientific validity of their programs [2] - Parents are encouraged to critically evaluate the claims made by these institutions, as the pursuit of creating "genius" children may lead to financial exploitation rather than actual developmental benefits [3]