2025.09.14 由网络大v罗永浩指责餐饮品牌西贝"卖预制菜"而起的网络大讨论已持续数天。看了各方专家和网友们 的观点，我感觉社会共识已经差不多达成。总结来看，公众核心诉求有二：一是应保障消费者知情权。 预制菜应明确标示，同时给出合理的价格，把选择权交给消费者。二是应抓紧出台预制菜相关国家标 准，并严格执行。 这么看来，这次围绕餐饮消费品质、价格与消费者权益问题的公共讨论已颇有成效，可以给罗永浩和所 有推动议题的专家、网民们记一功。笔者认同上述两点意见，只想再谈谈注意到的一个现象：网上对罗 永浩"开炮"的看法，形成了泾渭分明的两派——消费者普遍力挺罗永浩，餐饮业老板们则几乎都声援西 贝。前一个阵营在社交媒体上占据绝对主导地位，后一个阵营则音量式微。用罗永浩的话来说， 是"90%的人都在骂西贝，骂我的10%都不到"。 这种对立局势表明，支持西贝是"危险"的，属于站到广大消费者的对立面。那老板们为何还"以身犯 险"？难道他们不知道谁才是自己的衣食父母？在笔者看来，这种反差，一方面体现出餐饮行业对标准 化模式的集体辩护与消费者诉求之间的冲突，另一方面，也反映出有相当一部分人，对罗永浩看似正义 的言行并不认同。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the criticism of the restaurant brand Xibei by internet celebrity Luo Yonghao regarding the sale of pre-prepared dishes, emphasizing the need for consumer awareness and transparency in the food industry [1][2]. Group 1: Consumer Rights and Industry Standards - The public's core demands are to ensure consumer rights to know about pre-prepared dishes and to establish clear national standards for such products [1][2]. - There is a significant public consensus supporting Luo Yonghao's stance, with consumers largely backing him while restaurant owners tend to support Xibei [1][2]. Group 2: Luo Yonghao's Influence and Controversy - Luo Yonghao has a history of engaging in public disputes with major brands, which has contributed to his rising popularity and influence on social media [2][3]. - His initial comments about Xibei's dishes being "almost all pre-prepared" were met with skepticism, as the actual classification of the dishes remains unclear [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Legal experts suggest that Luo Yonghao's initial statements may have legal implications, potentially leading to lawsuits for defamation or misinformation [4]. - The negative impact of his comments on Xibei and other businesses in the pre-prepared food industry raises questions about the responsibility of public figures in their statements [4][5]. Group 4: Responsibility of Public Figures - The article highlights the importance of public figures being cautious with their influence, as their words can have significant consequences for businesses and public perception [5]. - It stresses that public figures should be aware of their responsibility and the potential repercussions of their statements in the digital age [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the criticism of the restaurant brand Xibei by internet celebrity Luo Yonghao regarding the sale of pre-prepared dishes, emphasizing the need for consumer awareness and transparency in the food industry [1][2]. Group 1: Consumer Rights and Industry Standards - There is a growing consensus among the public that consumer rights must be protected, specifically the right to know about pre-prepared dishes, which should be clearly labeled and reasonably priced [1][2]. - The call for the establishment and strict enforcement of national standards for pre-prepared dishes has gained traction in public discussions [1][2]. Group 2: Public Figures and Their Influence - Luo Yonghao's actions have sparked a divided response, with consumers largely supporting him while restaurant owners tend to defend Xibei, indicating a conflict between industry practices and consumer expectations [2][3]. - The article highlights Luo Yonghao's history of engaging in public disputes with major brands, suggesting that his controversial statements may be strategically timed to coincide with his entrepreneurial ventures [2][3]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Legal experts suggest that Luo Yonghao's initial comments may have crossed into defamation, raising questions about the responsibility of public figures in their statements [4]. - The negative impact of Luo Yonghao's remarks on the restaurant industry, particularly Xibei, has been noted, with claims of significant revenue declines following his statements [4][5]. Group 4: Responsibility of Public Figures - The article stresses the importance of public figures being cautious with their influence, as their words can have significant repercussions on businesses and public perception [5]. - It is emphasized that the power of public discourse comes with greater responsibility, and public figures should be mindful of their statements to avoid causing harm [5].