Core Viewpoint - The company Shenzhen Jiangtuo Commerce Co., Ltd. decided to cancel the previously planned work on September 27, 2025, after employee complaints to the labor department regarding the adjustment of work schedules due to a typhoon, leading to a change in the company's vacation policy [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions and Decisions - Shenzhen Jiangtuo initially planned to have employees work on September 27 to compensate for the time lost due to Typhoon "Hagupit" [3]. - Following employee complaints, the company announced that September 27 would remain a holiday, but it would cancel the 14-day annual leave benefit and all additional holidays [4]. - The company emphasized that it has always complied with national regulations since its establishment in 2018 and has provided various holiday benefits [4]. Group 2: Employee Reactions and Legal Context - Employee complaints led to a discussion with the labor department, which required the company to adhere to the normal Saturday holiday schedule [4]. - Some employees expressed support for the company, while others raised concerns about the potential impact of frequent schedule changes on their lives [4]. - Legal experts indicated that the company's cancellation of annual leave could be unlawful, as it contradicts the provisions of the Labor Law regarding paid annual leave [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company Shenzhen Jiangtuo Commerce Co., Ltd. faced backlash after attempting to require employees to work on September 27, 2025, to compensate for lost time due to a typhoon, leading to the cancellation of employee benefits including a 14-day annual leave [5][6][12]. Group 1: Company Actions and Reactions - Shenzhen Jiangtuo initially planned to have employees work on September 27 to make up for time lost due to Typhoon "Hagupit," which caused a two-day holiday [5][12]. - Following employee complaints to the labor department, the company decided to cancel the work requirement for September 27, but announced the cancellation of the 14-day annual leave and all additional holidays [6][12]. - The company emphasized that it has always adhered to national regulations and has provided various benefits since its establishment in 2018 [5][6]. Group 2: Employee and Public Response - The incident sparked significant online discussion, with mixed reactions from the public; some supported the company while others criticized the cancellation of benefits [3][8][10]. - A former employee commented on the company's annual leave policy, suggesting that the cancellation was premeditated [10][11]. - The company’s representative expressed frustration over the situation, stating that the complaints made the company feel "very passive" and that the adjustments were necessary to avoid delays in shipping [12]. Group 3: Legal Perspective - A legal expert noted that as long as the company's revised leave policy complies with national laws, the decision-making process is considered legal and valid [14]. - According to the "Regulations on Paid Annual Leave for Employees," employees are entitled to paid leave based on their years of service, which the company must adhere to [14].