Workflow
公司诉讼风险
icon
Search documents
启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司 对外担保事项进展公告
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码:000826 证券简称:启迪环境 公告编号:2025-038 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司 对外担保事项进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证公告内容的真实、准确和完整,公告不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重 大遗漏。 启迪环境科技发展股份有限公司(以下简称"启迪环境"或"公司")根据各级子公司业务开展及经营所 需,近期新增公司为控股子公司提供担保、公司与相关子公司贷款担保事项已部分解除担保等事项。具 体内容如下: (一)本次新增对外担保情况 公司依据股东大会授权实施对外担保事项,近期新增公司控股子公司为子公司提供担保3,875万元,具 体如下: 单位:万元 ■ (二)担保解除情况 一、担保情况概述 公司与部分控股子公司提供担保部分解除,解除担保额度为22,746.10万元,具体如下: 单位:万元 ■ 注:此担保余额指因融资担保事项,公司与相关债权人签署的担保合同金额(有部分业务的实际用款金 额小于担保合同金额)扣减合同期内债务人部分归还债务本金后的余额,可能出现大于存续的债务本金 余额的情形。 二、公司为浙江启迪生态及下属子公司担保相关情况 公司原控股 ...
ST宁科: ST宁科关于重大诉讼的结果公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-22 10:21
Core Viewpoint - Ningxia Zhongke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is facing significant financial distress, with a total debt of 2.164 billion yuan and overdue debts amounting to 1.81 billion yuan, leading to a serious risk of bankruptcy [1][5]. Group 1: Debt and Financial Status - The company's total debt scale is 2.164 billion yuan, with overdue debts totaling 1.81 billion yuan and litigation-related debts amounting to 1.26 billion yuan [1][5]. - Most of the company's bank accounts, except for those of its subsidiary Ningxia Huahui Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Ningxia Tianfu Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., are frozen, severely impacting its liquidity [1][5]. - Although the bank accounts of Zhongke New Materials Co., Ltd. have been unfrozen, the company is currently lacking sufficient funds and liquid assets to repay its debts, indicating a significant risk to its ongoing operations [1][5]. Group 2: Litigation Status - The company is a defendant in multiple lawsuits, including disputes over loan contracts, equity transfer contracts, sales contracts, construction contracts, and securities fraud [2][5]. - A recent court ruling from the Guangdong Zhanjiang Intermediate People's Court dismissed the claims made by Guangdong Nanyue Bank against the company, stating that the bank failed to verify the public disclosure of the guarantee matters [3][5]. - The court supported the company's defense regarding the "maximum pledge contract," ruling that it does not have legal effect, thus not impacting the company's current or future profits [3][5].