Group 1 - The recent news about the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau's decision to legally dissolve the "China Low Altitude Economy Alliance" highlights the growing concern over "involution" competition within the low-altitude economy sector, which is seen as a strategic emerging industry with significant potential [1] - The dissolution is viewed as a critical first step in addressing the chaotic competition in the low-altitude industry, signaling the authorities' commitment to optimizing the industry ecosystem and curbing unhealthy competition practices [1] - Various industries, including both emerging sectors like photovoltaics and traditional sectors like coking and landscaping, have faced similar issues of "involution," characterized by excessive price competition and low-level repetitive construction, leading to overcapacity and thin profit margins [1] Group 2 - The persistent issue of "involution" competition is closely linked to resource misallocation and distorted market mechanisms, where companies focusing on short-term gains through price wars neglect quality and service improvements, resulting in inefficiency [2] - Governments that create "policy depressions" without considering local industry foundations and resource endowments contribute to homogenized industry layouts and resource waste, further exacerbating the problem [2] - Effective governance of "involution" competition requires a multi-faceted approach, emphasizing the need for a collaborative market environment that combines effective markets with proactive government intervention [2] Group 3 - To combat "involution" competition, it is essential to optimize the business environment, which involves reducing costs while increasing value, encouraging businesses to move away from zero-sum price wars and reliance on subsidies [3] - The focus should shift from resource-driven competition to innovation-driven growth, allowing businesses to unlock innovation, quality, and brand advantages [3] - The governance approach has evolved from merely preventing "involution" competition to actively regulating low-price disorderly competition, reflecting a systematic and legal framework for long-term management of the issue [3]