Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing divide between tech company leadership and employees in Silicon Valley, particularly in the context of political pressures and changes in corporate culture under the Trump administration. Group 1: Corporate Response to Political Pressure - Tech leaders, including Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, have shown compliance with the Trump administration to avoid negative business impacts, leading to a shift in corporate policies regarding diversity and inclusion [1][4] - Employees at Meta have expressed silent protests against leadership decisions, such as the removal of gender-specific hygiene products, indicating a growing discontent with management's alignment with government policies [3][4] Group 2: Employee Discontent and Corporate Culture - A Meta engineer was terminated for sharing internal information, highlighting a growing tension between the company's emphasis on control and the previously encouraged culture of openness [5] - The internal assessment at Meta indicated a plan to lay off 5% of underperforming employees, raising fears among staff about job security and the potential for being targeted for non-compliance [5][6] Group 3: Shift in Employee Dynamics - The article notes that the majority of tech employees in Silicon Valley are foreign nationals, which complicates their ability to voice dissent due to immigration concerns [6][7] - Political discussions have largely disappeared from workplace forums, with employees fearing repercussions for speaking out against corporate decisions [6] Group 4: Decline of Open Corporate Culture - The once-open culture of companies like Google has shifted, with areas of their headquarters now restricted to employees only, reflecting a move towards increased security and control [9][10] - The article suggests that the current leadership's focus on political alignment and business stability may stifle innovation, leading to a potential decline in the competitive edge of these tech giants [11]

"迎合特朗普"的品牌将被抵制！这些美国人正改变 消费习惯…… 一项最新民调显示，五分之一的美国消费者计划永久抵制那些调整政策以迎合特朗普议程的公司。 根据《卫报》委托哈里斯民调公司进行的调查，包括亚马逊、塔吉特和特斯拉在内的知名品牌正面临消 费者的抵制。 调查结果表明，这些抵制行动可能不是一时冲动，而是长期性的消费者行为变化，在年轻一代以及少数 族裔群体中尤为突出。 消费习惯改变 哈里斯民调公司（Harris Poll）首席战略官利比·罗德尼（Libby Rodney）指出，企业和消费者之间正在 进行一场"高风险博弈"——企业普遍押注消费者最终会因便利性和产品质量而回归，消费者则试图以经 济手段表达立场。 罗德尼表示，数据表明企业的想法是误判。20%的美国人正在永久改变他们的消费习惯，近三分之一的 抵制者表示他们的行动将无限期持续。 这一趋势表明，企业可能无法再单纯依赖品牌忠诚度和市场优势，而需要在政治和社会议题上作出更慎 重的决策。 调查发现，36%的美国人表示，他们正在或计划参与近期的抵制行动，但这一比例在不同代际、种族和 政治群体之间差异明显。 具体来看，53%的"Z世代"（1997-2012年出生）和 ...