冻结俄罗斯资产

Search documents
乌克兰总统泽连斯基:计划在七国集团峰会期间讨论冻结俄罗斯资产以及对石油设定价格上限的问题。
news flash· 2025-06-16 13:34
Group 1 - The core focus of the article is on Ukrainian President Zelensky's intention to discuss the freezing of Russian assets and the establishment of a price cap on oil during the G7 summit [1] Group 2 - The discussion on freezing Russian assets is aimed at increasing pressure on Russia amid ongoing geopolitical tensions [1] - Setting a price cap on oil is part of broader efforts to manage energy prices and reduce revenue streams for Russia [1]
34亿美元的“背叛”!欧盟拿俄资产赔西方投资者,乌克兰急了
Jin Shi Shu Ju· 2025-06-06 02:17
Core Viewpoint - The Ukrainian government criticizes the decision to use frozen Russian assets to compensate Western investors, arguing that it undermines Europe's stance against Moscow [1][2]. Group 1: Ukrainian Government's Position - Ukraine is pushing to use the $300 billion in frozen Russian assets for national reconstruction and defense, warning that the recent decision sends the wrong signal and may weaken Europe's negotiating position with Russia [2]. - Iryna Mudra, a senior official in the Ukrainian president's office, states that compensating private investors before the victims of the Russia-Ukraine conflict is unjust [2]. - Mudra emphasizes that international law requires aggressors to fully compensate victims, not investors who entered high-risk jurisdictions [2]. Group 2: European Central Bank's Actions - The European Clearing Bank's decision to use €3 billion ($3.4 billion) of frozen Russian investor funds for compensation was approved by Belgium, which is executing EU regulations [3]. - The European Clearing Bank holds €195 billion in Russian cash assets, primarily from the Russian central bank, and any return of funds to Russia could be used for military purposes [3]. Group 3: Concerns Over Precedents - Ukrainian officials express concerns that the compensation decision sets a bad precedent, with criticism from various stakeholders, including lawmakers who argue that Western companies should bear their own risks [4][5]. - Critics, including Jacob Kirkegaard from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, find it shocking that corporate interests are prioritized over funding for Ukraine's defense [5].