今年7月份以来，小米公司、华为鸿蒙智行、理想汽车等企业先后报警称"某平台集中涌现大量针对其汽车品牌的 负面文章"。 接警后，烟台公安展开侦查。办案人员对平台上3000余条负面文章逐一甄别后，发现均出自一批注册时间短、活 跃度异常、IP地址分散的账号，背后存在明显的产业化运作痕迹，疑似"网络水军"有预谋地进行炒作引流并牟 利。 在初步掌握犯罪事实后，烟台市公安局成立专案组，经进一步侦查，发现该团伙利用技术工具抓取"小米""华 为""理想"等关键词，借助人工智能技术批量生产低质、雷同的"网络垃圾"，其目的仅仅是赚取平台流量带来的收 益。 为固定证据，专案组以犯罪团伙操控的海量虚假账号为突破口，深入分析各类网络信息8万余条，循线核查资金流 水10万余条，全面厘清该团伙的组织架构、人员分工和完整作案流程。在掌握证据后，专案组于烟台、聊城两地 同步收网，成功抓获12名犯罪嫌疑人，查扣涉案资金100余万元，关停违法网络账号8000余个，实现了对这一新 型"网络水军"犯罪团伙的全链条、穿透式打击。 今天(12月18日)，南都N视频记者从烟台公安局获悉，烟台公安历时四个月，打掉一个炒作新能源汽车负面信息的 团伙，一举抓获12 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent actions by major cloud storage platforms indicate a renewed focus on content regulation and compliance with legal requirements, leading to the removal of user files deemed inappropriate or illegal [1][3][42] Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Compliance - Platforms are compelled to delete files due to strict legal regulations, as exemplified by the case of Qvod, which faced severe penalties for failing to manage content responsibly [8][9] - The legal obligation to monitor and remove illegal content is not optional but a requirement to avoid significant fines and potential criminal charges against responsible parties [9][16] Group 2: Copyright and Content Ownership - The pressure from copyright holders has intensified, with companies employing legal teams to monitor and enforce copyright claims against platforms hosting pirated content [11][15] - Historical cases, such as the shutdown of Megaupload, highlight the severe consequences platforms face when failing to address copyright infringement [12][15] Group 3: Technological Measures for Content Regulation - Platforms utilize a multi-layered filtering system to identify and remove illegal content, starting with hash value comparisons to detect known infringing files [21][23] - Advanced AI technology is employed to analyze content directly, identifying violations based on visual and audio elements, although it is not infallible [29][31] Group 4: Business Model Evolution - The shift from user acquisition to profitability has led platforms to tighten content regulations, viewing users who store pirated content as high-cost liabilities rather than potential customers [38][40] - By enforcing stricter content policies, platforms aim to reduce legal risks and operational costs while attracting higher-quality users willing to pay for services [40][42] Group 5: User Experience and Perception - Users often feel a loss of control over their digital assets when files are removed without notice, leading to frustration and confusion regarding data ownership [42][44] - The dichotomy between user expectations of privacy and the platforms' regulatory responsibilities creates a complex relationship where users must relinquish some control over their data [44]