Group 1 - The NATO summit held in The Hague faced protests from over 20 countries, with demonstrators accusing NATO of being against peace and development [1] - The G7 summit preceding the NATO meeting did not produce a joint communiqué or a unified statement on Ukraine, highlighting internal divisions among Western nations [1][2] - The G7 summit's outcomes were limited, with significant disagreements on key issues, including trade negotiations and military actions regarding Iran [2] Group 2 - The NATO summit focused on military spending as a percentage of GDP, with a push for member countries to increase defense budgets to 5% by 2032, a significant rise from previous standards [4][5] - Some NATO members, like Spain, successfully negotiated to maintain their military spending at 2.1%, avoiding the proposed 5% increase [5] - The U.S. under Trump aimed to extend military spending demands to non-NATO allies like Japan and South Korea, but these countries found the 3.5% target unacceptable, leading to cancellations of planned meetings [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that NATO allies must increase military spending and allocate resources more intelligently to enhance defense cooperation [1] Group 2 - The Turkish Defense Minister's statement reflects a growing concern among NATO members regarding defense capabilities and funding [1] - The call for smarter spending indicates a shift towards more strategic allocation of military resources within NATO [1]