Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the exclusive agency rights of AestheFill (艾塑菲) between *ST Suwu and REGEN has escalated into legal proceedings, with *ST Suwu's subsidiary, Datou Medical, filing for arbitration to confirm the validity of the exclusive agency agreement and seeking significant compensation for alleged losses [1][3][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Dispute - Datou Medical has initiated arbitration at the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court, which was formally accepted on August 7, 2023, requesting confirmation of the exclusive agency agreement and continuation of supply obligations, along with a compensation claim of up to 1.6 billion yuan for various losses [3][4]. - The partnership between Datou Medical and REGEN began in August 2022, granting Datou Medical exclusive distribution rights for AestheFill in mainland China until August 28, 2032 [3][4]. - REGEN terminated the agreement citing violations by Datou Medical, including the unauthorized transfer of agency rights and reputational damage due to *ST Suwu's legal issues [4][5]. Group 2: Financial Implications - AestheFill is a critical revenue driver for *ST Suwu, with projected sales of 3.26 billion yuan in 2024, accounting for 20.42% of the company's total revenue, and a gross profit of 2.69 billion yuan, representing 34.8% of total gross profit [6]. - In Q1 2025, AestheFill's sales revenue increased to 1.13 billion yuan, making up 35.55% of total revenue, with gross profit reaching 0.92 billion yuan, which is 45.77% of total gross profit, highlighting its importance to the company's profitability [6][7]. Group 3: Market Context and Strategic Importance - The dispute over AestheFill's agency rights reflects the competitive nature of the medical aesthetics industry, where control over distribution and pricing can significantly impact revenue and profit margins [8]. - The ongoing legal battle underscores the reliance of companies in the medical aesthetics sector on blockbuster products to drive financial performance, indicating a broader trend in the industry [8].

Core Viewpoint - The dispute over the exclusive agency rights for AestheFill between Jiangsu Wuzhong and Aimeike has escalated, with Jiangsu Wuzhong initiating arbitration against REGEN for breach of contract after REGEN terminated their exclusive distribution agreement [1][2]. Group 1: Arbitration and Legal Actions - Jiangsu Wuzhong announced on August 11 that it has filed for arbitration with the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court regarding REGEN's breach of contract, seeking to confirm the validity of the exclusive agency agreement for AestheFill until August 28, 2032 [1][2]. - The arbitration request includes demands for REGEN to supply AestheFill products as per the agreement, and if not supported, for REGEN to compensate Jiangsu Wuzhong for losses estimated at RMB 1.6 billion [1][2]. Group 2: Financial Impact and Market Position - As of August 12, Jiangsu Wuzhong's stock price was reported at RMB 1.08 per share, with a market capitalization of RMB 768 million, while Aimeike's stock was at RMB 188.45 per share, with a market capitalization of RMB 57.02 billion [1]. - AestheFill, which was launched in April 2024, contributed over RMB 300 million in revenue to Jiangsu Wuzhong within eight months, highlighting its significance to the company's financial recovery [4][9]. Group 3: Company Strategies and Responses - Following the termination of the agreement, Jiangsu Wuzhong initiated the "W Sunshine Guardian Plan," providing free repair treatments to clients who previously received AestheFill treatments, while also offering training support to partner institutions [11]. - Aimeike has begun selling AestheFill under a new brand name "Zhen Ai Su Fei" in the domestic market, indicating a shift in branding strategy post-dispute [11]. Group 4: Background and Context - The agency rights dispute has roots in Aimeike's acquisition of REGEN in March 2025, which raised concerns about the future of AestheFill's distribution rights [8]. - The legal conflict is compounded by both companies facing performance pressures, with Aimeike's revenue growth slowing significantly and Jiangsu Wuzhong previously reporting six consecutive years of net losses [9].

Core Viewpoint - The exclusive distribution rights for AestheFill, the first imported "youthful injection" in China's competitive regenerative medical beauty market, have changed due to a termination notice issued by REGEN to its distributor, Datou Medical [1][7]. Group 1: Company Actions - REGEN terminated the exclusive distribution agreement with Datou Medical due to multiple breaches, including the unauthorized transfer of distribution rights to its controlling shareholder, Jiangsu Wuzhong Aesthetic Biotechnology [4][5][7]. - Following the termination, REGEN has instructed Datou Medical to cease all operations as the exclusive distributor and will not accept any further orders from them [7][8]. - Jiangsu Wuzhong has publicly disputed REGEN's claims, asserting that no transfer of exclusive rights occurred and that the agreement did not stipulate that administrative penalties could trigger termination [8][11]. Group 2: Financial Implications - AestheFill generated over 300 million yuan in revenue for Jiangsu Wuzhong within eight months of its launch in April 2024 [7]. - The termination of the distribution agreement could significantly impact Jiangsu Wuzhong's revenue and profitability in the second half of the year, as the company had relied on AestheFill for financial recovery [16][17]. - Both companies have faced declining performance, with Jiangsu Wuzhong's stock price dropping to 1.70 yuan per share, while AestheFill's parent company, Aimeike, saw its stock rise by over 6% following the announcement [7][17]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The AestheFill product is expected to undergo a rebranding to "Zhenai Su Fei" in the Chinese market, with REGEN planning to establish a direct sales team to enhance brand image and market positioning [12][20]. - The competitive landscape in the regenerative medical beauty sector is intensifying, with nine products already certified in the domestic market, indicating potential opportunities for other players amid the ongoing disputes between Jiangsu Wuzhong and Aimeike [20].

Core Viewpoint - The recent change in the medical device registration agent for Aisufei Tongyan Needle from Datou Medical to Lizhen Biotechnology has raised concerns in the medical aesthetics industry regarding the future of its agency rights [1][2]. Group 1: Agency Rights and Market Impact - Datou Medical, a subsidiary of Jiangsu Wuzhong Pharmaceutical Development Co., holds exclusive sales rights for Aisufei in mainland China until August 28, 2032, as confirmed by *ST Suwu [1][3]. - The exclusive sales rights are protected by a legally binding agreement, which states that there are no risks of cancellation or termination during the effective period [1][4]. - The market is speculating whether Aimeike's acquisition of Regen will affect *ST Suwu's exclusive sales rights, despite current assurances that these rights remain intact [1][2][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Projections - Aisufei's sales in China are projected to account for approximately half of its global sales, making it the top international brand in the aesthetic needle category [2][4]. - In 2024, *ST Suwu's revenue from medical aesthetics is expected to reach 330 million yuan, representing about 21% of total revenue, marking a significant turnaround after six years of losses [2][4]. - The potential profits from Aisufei's sales during the remaining eight years of the agency agreement could amount to a substantial figure, far exceeding the 190 million USD acquisition cost of Regen by Aimeike [4][5]. Group 3: Legal and Brand Implications - If Regen were to breach the agreement and reclaim agency rights, *ST Suwu could seek damages equivalent to all potential profits during the agency period, which could have devastating financial implications for Regen [4][5]. - The core value of medical aesthetic products lies not only in their composition but also in the long-term brand recognition and trust built with distribution channels [5][6]. - A legal dispute over agency rights could lead to Aisufei being perceived as a "controversial product," potentially damaging its market position and consumer trust [5][6]. Group 4: Strategic Considerations for Aimeike - Aimeike must consider the potential impact on its capital market image if the core product of the acquired Regen faces significant sales risks and instability in overseas channels [6]. - The disruption of Regen's global agency network due to issues in China could hinder Aimeike's international expansion strategy, which relies on Regen's resources [5][6].