8月23日，印度外长苏杰生公开澄清了近期关于中印关系缓和的种种猜测，他的表态明确无比："没有这 回事，中国和印度之间最近的关系缓和，与美国和印度之间的关系不相关。" 这一表态发生在美国总统特朗普对印度商品加征25%关税、使印度对美出口税率飙升至50%之后，以及 印度总理莫迪宣布将访华参加上合组织峰会之前。 8月6日，美国总统特朗普签署行政命令，宣布对印度商品加征25%的关税，使印度出口到美国的商品总 税率达到惊人的50%。 特朗普给出的理由简单直接：印度明知美国制裁俄罗斯，却仍然购买俄罗斯石油。但这一理由遭到印度 外交部驳斥，指责美国实行"双重标准"。 关税措施立即产生实质影响。印度卢比汇率应声跌至87.87的历史低点，纺织厂订单断崖式下滑，汽车 零件商连夜商讨向越南迁移生产线。 面对美国的关税压力，莫迪政府做出了一个震动世界的决定：在24小时内宣布，莫迪将于8月31日访问 中国，出席上合组织峰会。 这将是莫迪七年来首次访华，时间节点选择在特朗普制裁的风口浪尖上，显得格外微妙。印度国内舆论 对此评论道："五年的谈判都没能让莫迪访华，特朗普只施压了三天，莫迪就决定了行程。" 莫迪此次访华带着明确的经济诉求。据报 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the ongoing tensions in U.S.-China relations, particularly in the context of trade negotiations and energy imports from Russia, with the U.S. acknowledging its limited leverage over China [1][3][5] - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. Treasury Secretary's admission that the U.S. lacks sufficient leverage to pressure China into abandoning Russian oil, indicating a shift in the dynamics of global trade and energy markets [3][5][11] - It emphasizes that the U.S. has previously had to make concessions in trade negotiations, as evidenced by the outcome of the tariff disputes, which suggests that the notion of a hard decoupling between the U.S. and China is overstated [3][5][11] Group 2 - The article outlines Trump's recent actions to impose new tariffs on several countries, excluding China, which may indicate a strategic approach to isolate China by treating its allies differently [7][9] - It notes the contrasting tariff rates imposed on Pakistan and India, suggesting a shift in U.S. foreign policy aimed at pressuring India to choose sides in the geopolitical landscape [9][11] - The article also highlights the relatively low tariff imposed on Brazil, indicating a calculated decision by the U.S. to avoid escalating tensions with a key member of the BRICS group while focusing on China as the primary target [9][11]