Core Points - The meeting emphasized the importance of cooperation between China and Europe in the global semiconductor supply chain, highlighting that both regions hold significant positions [1] - The current international situation is complex and poses challenges to the stability of the semiconductor supply chain, necessitating a commitment to oppose unilateralism and bullying actions [1] - The meeting served as a platform for enhancing understanding, boosting trade confidence, and deepening cooperation among semiconductor enterprises from both regions, which is expected to contribute to global economic recovery [1] Industry Insights - The meeting was attended by representatives from the Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, and addressed issues and suggestions raised by enterprises [2] - The Chinese government is committed to expanding high-level opening-up and providing a fair, stable, transparent, and predictable policy environment for semiconductor enterprises [1]

Group 1 - The meeting hosted by China's permanent representative to the UN, Ambassador Fu Cong, focused on the impact of unilateralism and bullying on international relations, with participation from over 80 countries, including Security Council members [1][3] - The trade war initiated by Trump aimed to pressure China through tariffs, but contrary to expectations, China's economy demonstrated resilience and continued to grow, with total foreign trade increasing while its trade share with the US declined [1][5] - Trump's recent calls for negotiations with China indicate a recognition of the need for dialogue, although his approach still reflects a sense of American arrogance [3][7] Group 2 - China's response to the trade war has been strategic, including measures such as controlling rare earth exports, which have forced US companies to seek cooperation with China [5] - Fu Cong criticized the US for its misuse of tariffs, stating that it violates WTO rules and disrupts global economic stability, prioritizing US interests over global fairness [5][7] - The expectation is that the US should approach negotiations with sincerity and equality, as merely signaling a desire to negotiate without genuine intent will not resolve existing issues [7]

Group 1 - The article discusses the potential reduction of tariffs on China by the U.S. government, suggesting a shift towards a more conciliatory approach [1][4][21] - It highlights the historical context of U.S.-China relations, particularly referencing past conflicts and the lessons learned from them, such as the significance of the "Water Gate Bridge" during the Korean War [11][13][27] - The article emphasizes China's industrial and technological advancements, contrasting them with the U.S.'s deindustrialization and reliance on financial gains, which has weakened its economic position [5][20][21] Group 2 - The narrative suggests that the current economic conflict is not just about trade but also about historical grievances and future global power dynamics [2][25][27] - It points out that many countries are increasingly supportive of China's stance against U.S. hegemony, indicating a shift in global sentiment towards a more equitable world order [23][25] - The article concludes that China's firm stance in the face of U.S. tariff threats is rooted in historical experiences and a desire for a fairer future, rather than mere economic competition [27][25][21]