Group 1 - The recent escalation of the US-China trade war involves both countries revealing their strategies, with China implementing countermeasures targeting critical sectors such as rare earths, port services, and the chip industry, while the US responds with a 100% tariff increase [1] - China's counteractions are not merely emotional responses but are based on its control over key industries and resources, indicating a strategic foresight beyond passive reactions [1][9] - The US's aggressive stance on tariffs conceals internal reservations about the severity of a full-blown conflict, as indicated by US Trade Representative Tai's comments suggesting that there is "no need for a trade war" [1][5] Group 2 - The volatility in the US stock market, particularly in the tech sector, reflects concerns over extreme policies, with companies losing billions in market value, highlighting their deep reliance on the Chinese market and supply chains [3] - High tariffs are expected to increase corporate costs and inflationary pressures, affecting various sectors including agriculture and finance, which may lead to a reconsideration of extreme tariff policies in the future [5] - European countries exhibit a divided stance, with Germany showing anxiety due to its reliance on Chinese supply chains, while other European nations remain cautious, indicating the complexities of global interdependence [7] Group 3 - The trade war represents a contest of confidence and strategy rather than mere rhetoric, with China demonstrating its accumulated strength through decisive actions, while the US balances its hardline approach with underlying concerns [9] - The escalation of the trade conflict reflects the fragility of current global industrial, political, and social structures, suggesting that the outcomes may already be determined by market dynamics and strategic depth rather than direct confrontations [9]