事实上，真正导致这种逆差的原因更复杂。毫无疑问，美国的贸易政策影响了中国产品进入美国市场，但这也意味着更多的中国货物涌入欧洲市 场，欧盟的应对措施反而成为了助推器。从统计数字来看，中国的出口始终保持增长，反观那些高高在上的"去风险"政策，则如同在刀尖上跳舞， 随时可能因失去平衡而跌得粉碎。 在这条看似简单的"去风险"政策下，其实隐藏着众多复杂的利益博弈。一方面，欧盟内部对华策略并非一致，一些国家仍旧坚持与中国的合作，认 为这将有助于提高欧洲的工业能力和竞争力。比如，匈牙利在过去五年中吸引了超过200亿欧元的电动汽车投资，其中大部分来自中国企业的支持。 近年来，欧洲在处理对华关系中的策略似乎走进了一个"黑暗森林"，冯德莱恩所推行的"去中国风险"战略不仅未能达到预期目标，反而让欧盟苦涩地 意识到自身在全球经济中被动的局面。 最近的一组数据显示，这一战略的失败愈发显而易见：2024年10月至2025年10月这段时间内，中国对欧洲的贸易顺差预计将达到3100亿美元，而对 美国则为3020亿美元，这意味着"中欧"的贸易关系首次超越"中美"。这并不仅仅是数字的游戏，更是一种深刻的地缘经济警示。 过去几十年里，中国与美国的 ...

Group 1 - The core issue arises from the U.S. imposing punitive tariffs on Indian goods, which has severely strained U.S.-India relations and provoked a strong reaction from Indian Prime Minister Modi [1][3] - The tariffs, which can reach as high as 50%, are justified by the U.S. citing India's purchase of Russian oil, but this move is perceived as self-serving and detrimental to alliances [3][4] - The tariffs affect over 55% of India's exports to the U.S., particularly impacting labor-intensive industries such as textiles and jewelry, leading to widespread concern among Indian businesses [4][6] Group 2 - The Indian government has responded by significantly reducing taxes on hundreds of consumer goods to stimulate domestic consumption and counteract the effects of the tariffs [4][6] - The situation has led to a shift in global perceptions, with countries reconsidering their alliances with the U.S. as it is now seen as an unreliable partner [6][8] - Modi's diplomatic moves, including visits to Japan and China, signal India's intent to assert its strategic autonomy and strengthen ties with other nations, particularly in the context of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization [8]