Core Viewpoint - The "dual investment advisory" model is transitioning from an innovative attempt in the industry to a mainstream practice, allowing securities firms and fund companies to collaborate within a compliant framework to enhance investment strategies and services [1][2] Group 1: Dual Investment Advisory Model - The dual investment advisory model involves collaboration between licensed securities firms and fund companies to optimize advisory strategies and improve service processes [1] - This model allows licensed institutions to break through their capability boundaries, achieving resource integration and complementing each other's strengths to expand the market for investment advisory services [2][6] - The model is seen as a shift from "individual institutional efforts" to "ecological collaboration," promoting a more efficient division of labor in the industry [6] Group 2: Product Innovation and Market Response - The "Happiness Small Goal" product exemplifies effective practice of the dual investment advisory model, showing significant growth in scale and efficiency since its launch, with a high proportion of retail clients [3][4] - The product features a diversified investment strategy that includes various asset classes, aiming to disperse risk globally and meet the strong demand for stable returns from clients [4] - In a low-interest-rate environment, traditional "fixed income+" products face challenges, making innovative products like "Happiness Small Goal" more appealing to investors [3] Group 3: Challenges and Considerations - The industry faces three main challenges in deepening collaboration: compliance constraints, power dynamics, and risk-sharing concerns [7] - Compliance pressures are significant, especially for institutions under the same parent company, which complicates cross-institutional cooperation due to strict regulatory requirements [7] - The need for clear delineation of responsibilities and risk-sharing mechanisms is crucial for sustainable collaboration in the dual investment advisory model [9] Group 4: Future Outlook - As the dual investment advisory model matures and industry consensus builds, it is expected to resolve challenges in wealth management, leading to a win-win situation for institutions, investors, and the industry [10]

Core Insights - The A-share market and global asset rotation have revitalized the fund advisory industry in 2025, with notable performance from star advisory combinations achieving average returns of 27.27% and 18.45% respectively [1][4] Group 1: A-share Market Performance - In October 2025, the A-share market showed positive performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing 4000 points and a monthly increase of 1.85%. Net inflows into stock ETFs exceeded 100 billion [2] - All 16 star fund advisory combinations focused on A-shares achieved positive returns in the first ten months of 2025, with an average return of 27.27%. The top performer was the China Europe Wealth's China Europe Super Stock All-Star with a return of 35.52% [2][3] - The top three combinations have made recent adjustments in their portfolios, focusing on sectors benefiting from global liquidity improvements and increasing allocations in areas like pharmaceuticals, electronics, and new consumption [2] Group 2: Global Asset Performance - A total of 26 global asset allocation fund advisory combinations reported positive returns in the first ten months of 2025, with an average net value increase of 18.45%. The top performer was the Guotai Fund's Guotai Progress Global Allocation with a return of 34.37% [4] - The global asset combinations have been expanding since 2023, with some achieving over 60% returns since inception, demonstrating the sustained advantages of global multi-asset strategies [4] Group 3: Dual Advisory Model - The dual advisory model, a collaboration between fund companies and brokerages, is gaining traction in 2025, allowing for a division of responsibilities where fund companies provide strategies and brokerages handle client outreach and sales [5][6] - This model is particularly appealing to small and medium-sized brokerages, enabling them to quickly adopt established strategies without incurring high research and development costs [6] - Despite the advantages, challenges exist, such as increased communication costs and the need for brokerages to make strategic decisions regarding reliance on external strategies versus developing their own [6][7]