Group 1 - The article discusses the contrasting attitudes of parents towards children's gaming, highlighting a divide between those who understand gaming as a potential bonding activity and those who view it as a harmful addiction [1][2][4] - A subset of parents, driven by extreme beliefs, resort to harsh measures to prevent their children from gaming, including physical punishment and sending them to notorious "rehabilitation schools" [2][9][26] - The article illustrates the irony that extreme measures often backfire, leading to further estrangement between parents and children rather than resolution [3][4][26] Group 2 - The formation of "anti-gaming alliances" among parents is noted, where they share their grievances and collectively protest against gaming, often through social media platforms [5][12][20] - The narrative includes personal stories of parents like Xiao Li and "Floor Brother," who, despite their initial attempts to bond with their children through gaming, end up alienating them due to their extreme anti-gaming stance [9][12][14] - The article emphasizes that many parents in these alliances are struggling with their own failures in parenting and project their frustrations onto gaming as the root cause of their issues [27][28][40] Group 3 - The article points out that the anti-gaming sentiment among parents is often fueled by a lack of communication and understanding of their children's needs, leading to a cycle of blame and conflict [30][31][42] - It highlights the psychological aspect of parental behavior, where parents refuse to acknowledge their own shortcomings and instead focus on external factors like gaming [28][41][43] - The article concludes that addressing the root causes of children's gaming habits requires parents to reflect on their own behaviors and communication styles rather than simply opposing gaming [46]