央视网消息：游戏成瘾，医学上称为"游戏障碍"，2019年，世界卫生组织把"游戏障碍"列入国际疾病分类体系。从"玩一会儿"到"停不下来"， 游戏成瘾不仅是行为习惯问题，更已成为威胁青少年身心健康的公共卫生挑战。 中南大学湘雅医院近期开展研究发现，对大脑尚处于发育关键期的青少年，海量信息可能导致认知碎片化，甚至影响未成年人对世界、对社 会、对人际关系的认知能力。 记者调查发现，全国多地医院心理门诊中，青少年因游戏障碍就诊的案例持续走高。 在中南大学湘雅医院心理卫生中心的网络游戏成瘾门诊，一下午前来问诊的患者就有15位，他们当中大多数都因为孩子沉迷手机游戏发生了严 重的冲突。家长们不知道原因出在哪，束手无策、十分焦急，而孩子们却只觉得自己只是爱打游戏，并没有心理问题。 医院对李女士的孩子进行了两个月的药物治疗以及家庭治疗，李女士在觉察到自己的情绪对孩子有负面影响后，也通过学习改变自己的行为模 式，帮助孩子一起治疗游戏成瘾的现象，目前孩子游戏使用的时间明显减少，过激行为也有所改善。 董慧茜：心理学有一句话叫孩子替家庭在生病，孩子的问题其实反映了家庭的问题。家里的问题解决了，孩子并不需要用生病来引起父母 的注意。 中国 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the challenges faced by modern parents who are trying to break the cycle of trauma from their own upbringing while raising their children in a new parenting paradigm [3][4][11] - There is a notable increase in young parents seeking psychological counseling for parent-child relationships, indicating a growing awareness of the impact of original family dynamics [4][10] - The concept of "original family" has gained significant traction online, with many attributing their personal struggles to the influence of their upbringing, leading to a cultural phenomenon [6][7] Group 2 - The rise of "electronic parents" on social media reflects a desire among modern parents to emulate idealized family dynamics, but this often leads to unrealistic expectations [12][13][15] - The article highlights a disconnect between the idealized portrayals of parenting online and the actual emotional struggles faced by families, suggesting that the pursuit of perfection can exacerbate issues [25][28] - The narrative around parenting has shifted from blaming parents for their children's issues to scrutinizing the new generation of parents, indicating a cyclical nature of familial criticism [29]

（原标题："我跟孩子关系很好"，可能只是家长的幻觉） 很多家长都会说，"我跟孩子关系很好"，但站在咨询师的角度来看，未必如此。 先来说说被当作"亲子关系好"的几个认知陷阱。 孩子过分顺从 孩子很听话、很顺从，这是家长的舒适区。 但孩子很有可能是在压抑自己的真实感受和需要，来照顾家长的情绪，满足家长的期待。 "这其实也不叫关系好，而是没有界限。即便亲如父母子女，也是需要边界的。 曾经有一个妈妈说，上高中的儿子跟她关系很好，到现在每天晚上都要粘着她，和她一起睡。 但这并不是健康的母子关系。 孩子过分依赖父母 不管大事、小情，父母都打着"为你好"的旗号，替孩子做决定，按照自己的期待和标准塑造孩子。 孩子遇到了任何困难，大人也会立刻想办法帮他解决，哪怕是跟同学发生了矛盾，也会立刻站出来替孩 子处理。 看起来是对孩子的爱和保护，但也完全剥夺了孩子自己尝试解决问题的机会。 久而久之，无法生长出能力和自信的孩子，就会变得很依赖父母。而父母也很享受孩子的依赖，因为这 能让自己感受到被需要的价值。 父母觉得，孩子依赖自己说明亲子关系好，但对于失去了独立人格的孩子来说，又何谈"关系好"呢？ 在亲子关系里，很多家长觉得，没有遇到来 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities of the parent-child relationship and whether parents can truly be friends with their children, emphasizing the need for a balance between parental authority and friendship qualities [2][11]. Group 1: Nature of Parent-Child vs. Friend Relationships - Parent-child relationships are characterized as "asymmetrical growth support relationships" where parents provide safety, establish rules, and guide values, necessitating a sense of authority [3]. - Friend relationships are defined as "symmetrical emotional reciprocity relationships" based on voluntary and equal interaction, focusing on emotional resonance and shared interests [3]. Group 2: Positive Aspects of Parents Trying to be Friends - Incorporating "friend traits" like empathy and respect can enhance trust and reduce communication barriers, allowing children to express their inner thoughts and avoid psychological issues [4]. - Friend-like interactions help in the development of children's self-identity by validating their individual feelings and interests, which is crucial for healthy self-recognition [5]. - Demonstrating equal respect in interactions teaches children cooperation and respect for differing viewpoints, which is vital for their future interpersonal relationships [6][7]. Group 3: Risks of Overemphasizing Friendship - Abandoning the guiding role in favor of friendship can undermine the child's sense of security, leading to confusion about boundaries and authority [8]. - Neglecting the role of socialization can result in children lacking a sense of rules, making it difficult for them to understand the consequences of their actions [9]. - Parents may project their emotional needs onto their children, reversing roles and causing psychological harm by making children feel responsible for their parents' emotional well-being [10]. Group 4: Balancing Roles Across Developmental Stages - For children aged 0-6, parental authority is paramount, with friendship traits manifesting through play and emotional responses without replacing rule-setting [11]. - For children aged 6-12, a transition occurs where parents must balance authority with empathy, guiding children while allowing them to understand the significance of rules [12]. - For adolescents aged 12-18, parents should adopt a more equal and respectful approach, reducing directive communication while maintaining essential guiding principles [13]. Conclusion - Parents can be trusted friends to their children while fulfilling their guiding responsibilities, achieving a balance that benefits the child's psychological development [14].

Group 1 - Different parental responses to children's mistakes can significantly impact the child's emotional development and personality [1][2][3] - Authoritarian parents tend to criticize and blame their children for minor mistakes, creating a tense atmosphere that discourages risk-taking [2] - Anxious parents may overreact, leading to children feeling insecure and fearful [3] Group 2 - A relaxed family environment allows children to make mistakes and learn from them, fostering emotional flow and resilience [4][8] - The concept of "relaxed" does not equate to a lack of rules; it involves a balance of support and guidance [5][6] - Healthy emotional expression is crucial, and both parents and children should learn to communicate feelings appropriately [7] Group 3 - Relaxed family dynamics nurture psychological safety, creativity, and resilience in children [8][10][12] - Children from supportive environments are more likely to face challenges with a rational mindset rather than fear [9] - Encouraging exploration and creativity can lead to higher problem-solving abilities in children [10][11] Group 4 - Positive parent-child communication can strengthen relationships and reduce rebellion during adolescence [14][15] - Understanding and validating children's feelings can enhance the effectiveness of parental guidance [14] Group 5 - Strategies for fostering a relaxed family atmosphere include allowing mistakes, distinguishing between significant and trivial issues, and managing parental emotions [16][17][18] - Parents should focus on self-growth and trust in their children, creating a supportive home environment [19]

从此，这个"讲故事"的特长就跟定了他，甚至，它变成了凯叔小时候的信心支柱。 新华网北京3月28日电（记者胡可璐）家庭教育和亲子关系是家长们的永恒课题。"很多家长不知道怎么与孩子沟通，是因为与孩子没有共同话题，没有 同频。"在"凯叔讲故事"创始人凯叔看来，良好的亲子关系，高效的亲子沟通，并不是一味靠说教，而是可以从一个"好故事"开始。《时代摘要》对话凯叔 （王凯），走进凯叔妙趣横生的故事世界，揭开高效亲子沟通的秘笈。 "故事大王"的创作之路 每个时代的小朋友们，心中都有一个属于自己的"故事大王"。从央视主持人，到创业者，再到"故事大王"，凯叔以标志性的光头，亲和的笑容，极富磁 性的声音，将每一个小朋友带入声临其境的故事情节，成为他们心中特别会"讲故事"的叔叔。 51000多集儿童音视频内容，累计播放超过245亿次，凯叔讲故事诞生了诸如凯叔四大名著、《凯叔史记》、《凯叔诗词来了》、《口袋神探》、《神奇 图书馆》等广受孩子们喜爱的优质内容。与此同时，凯叔讲故事还将线上音频故事延伸至有声硬件、儿童图书、动画片、儿童舞台剧、自媒体等多种业务领 域，形成以"凯叔"为标签的儿童爆款IP。 访谈中，凯叔分享了他在创作好故事过 ...

东北独生女，如何被托举？ 过去的一个月里，互联网最洗脑的音乐莫过于那句："美美桑～内～～"。 这四个字音译自韩语歌曲《onespot》的第一句歌词，演唱者是小沈阳的女儿沈佳润。 随着美美桑内的爆火，互联网"投胎第一志愿"也发生了大调剂。过去，人人都想投胎成为王诗龄，如今大批人调转船头，集体羡慕沈佳润。 关于沈佳润成长过程中的蛛丝马迹，都被网友挖了出来，零星拼凑出一个接近完美的家庭托举故事：尽享父母积攒的金钱和资源，稳居家庭的爱意中心。 一时间，东北独生女，成了全网最被羡慕的对象。 和之前爆火的江浙沪独生女文学不同，沈佳润的剧本不是一个有钱有爱、无需吃苦的模板，而是父母动用资金和人脉全力支持女儿追求梦想的故事。 比起买房买车嫁给本地人，成立公司托举女儿事业更接近于新时代的理想父母之爱。它意味着：父母不仅提供富足的生活，还尊重并支持你的梦想。 "美美桑内"成为统治今夏的爆火BGM开始，围绕沈佳润的二创就没停过。 明明是韩娱专辑，却得到了东北全明星的联名翻唱。 就连封面的风格，都是统一的。 这种别致的宣发，透露出一种"家里孩子刚上班，亲戚都来搭把手"的东北大家庭式的帮扶。 从出道到爆火，沈佳润的"成名"只用了一个月 ...

过去的一个月里，互联网最洗脑的音乐莫过于那句： "美美桑～内～～" 父母不仅提供富足的生活，还尊重并支持你的梦想。 东北独生女，如何被托举？ "美美桑内"成为统治今夏的爆火BGM开始，围绕沈佳润的二创就没停过。 明明是韩娱专辑，却得到了东北全明星的联名翻唱。 就连封面的风格，都是统一的。 这四个字音译自韩语歌曲《onespot》的第一句歌词，演唱者是小沈阳的女儿沈佳润。 7月25日，《onespot》登顶QQ音乐韩国榜。 随着美美桑内的爆火，互联网"投胎第一志愿"也发生了大调剂。过去，人人都想投胎成为王诗龄，如今大批人调转船头，集体羡慕沈佳润。 关于沈佳润成长过程中的蛛丝马迹，都被网友挖了出来，零星拼凑出一个接近完美的家庭托举故事： 尽享父母积攒的金钱和资源，稳居家庭的爱意中心。 一时间，东北独生女，成了全网最被羡慕的对象。 和之前爆火的江浙沪独生女文学不同，沈佳润的剧本不是一个有钱有爱、无需吃苦的模板，而是父母动用资金和人脉全力支持女儿追求梦想的故事。 比起买房买车嫁给本地人，成立公司托举女儿事业更接近于新时代的理想父母之爱。它意味着： 这种别致的宣发，透露出一种"家里孩子刚上班，亲戚都来搭把手"的东北大家 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the psychological challenges faced by families after the national college entrance examination, particularly the tensions between parents and children regarding unmet expectations and future choices [1][4][6]. Group 1: Psychological Impact on Families - There is a noticeable increase in parents and students seeking psychological help due to heightened conflicts and strained relationships post-examination [1][3]. - Many conflicts arise from unmet promises made by parents before the exams, leading to feelings of disappointment among students [2][4]. - The underlying issues often stem from long-term imbalances in power dynamics and neglected psychological needs within the family [1][6]. Group 2: Parental Expectations vs. Student Desires - Students express frustration over parents not fulfilling pre-exam commitments, such as buying new phones or allowing personal expression through hairstyles [4][5]. - Parents often prioritize practical career paths over students' personal interests, leading to significant disagreements during the college application process [4][5]. - The article illustrates the generational divide, where parents focus on security and stability, while students seek autonomy and self-identity [6][7]. Group 3: Communication Strategies - Effective communication strategies are suggested to bridge the gap between parents and children, emphasizing the importance of empathy and understanding [8][9]. - Parents are encouraged to recognize their children's needs for exploration and independence, while children should acknowledge parental concerns about future stability [8][11]. - The article advocates for a collaborative approach to decision-making, where both parties can express their views without conflict [9][10]. Group 4: Long-term Solutions - Early career exploration and psychological support in schools are recommended to help students develop a clearer sense of self and reduce future conflicts [10][11]. - The importance of allowing children to make mistakes and learn from them is emphasized, as this is crucial for their growth and decision-making skills [11][12]. - The article concludes that families should function as supportive environments for exploration rather than battlegrounds for control [10][11].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the extreme measures taken by parents to address their child's academic decline, specifically the decision to expel the child from home after achieving a score of 575 in the college entrance examination [1][2] - The parents' frustration stems from their perception of the child's laziness and decline in academic performance, despite previous promises to focus on studies after acquiring a smartphone [1][2] - Public sentiment appears to sympathize with the parents, viewing their drastic actions as necessary to motivate a child perceived as a "giant baby" [1] Group 2 - The article questions whether the parents' harsh actions are a result of a deeper, long-standing breakdown in trust and communication between them and the child [2] - It suggests that many parents mistakenly believe that controlling access to electronic devices will solve the problem of their child's academic focus, while the root causes may lie in the educational approach and external pressures faced by the child [2][3] - The narrative highlights the potential negative impact of viewing children as tools for achieving parental goals, which can lead to a lack of emotional support and autonomy for the child [3]