深追踪丨曝光！一边"拥核"，一边"台湾有事"：高市早苗这位亲信劣迹斑斑！ 国际在线综合报道：据日本《周刊文春》电子版12月24日报道，日本首相官邸高官此前被曝声称"日本 应拥核"受多方谴责，消息人士向《周刊文春》透露，发表该言论的是日本首相高市早苗的亲信、首相 辅佐官——尾上定正。 更值得警惕的是，鼓吹"拥核"的尾上定正，同时也是长期操盘"台湾有事"兵棋推演的关键人物。 台防务部门下属智库在2023年和2024年连续两年与日本智库在东京就所谓"台湾有事"举行兵棋推演，而 尾上定正正是相关推演的策划者之一。值得注意的是，参与上述两次兵推的多名人员，随后均进入了高 市政府的执政团队。 随着军事元素在日本整体国家战略中占据越来越突出的地位，"台湾有事"正逐步被塑造成日本突破战后 军事禁区的重要抓手。而集"拥核论调"与"台海兵推"于一身的尾上定正，正成为这一危险倾向中的关键 人物。(丁天怡) 来源：中央广电总台国际在线 尾上定正 (资料图) 日本《周刊现代》注意到，高市早苗上台后，任命尾上定正担任负责安保政策的首相辅佐官。日媒指 出，尾上出身日本航空自卫队，曾任北部航空方面队司令官、航空自卫队补给本部长等要职。按照日 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the controversial statement made by a senior official in the Japanese Prime Minister's office advocating for Japan to pursue nuclear capabilities, which has drawn widespread condemnation [1] - The official in question, Onoue Sadamasa, is a close aide to Prime Minister Kishi Sanae and has been involved in military simulations regarding Taiwan, indicating a significant shift in Japan's defense policy [2] - Onoue's appointment as a security policy advisor is unusual as it breaks the norm of appointing a sitting member of the Diet, reflecting a deeper involvement of the Kishi government in Taiwan Strait issues [2][3] Group 2 - The increasing emphasis on military elements in Japan's national strategy positions the Taiwan situation as a critical factor for Japan to break its post-war military constraints [3] - Onoue Sadamasa's dual role in promoting nuclear armament and conducting military simulations related to Taiwan underscores a dangerous trend in Japan's defense posture [3]

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi on November 7 regarding "Taiwan's situation" have sparked controversy, indicating a lack of coordination and understanding of the rapidly changing international relations [1][3]. Group 1 - Sanna Takashi's statements during the budget committee meeting exceeded the prepared response guidelines, leading to increased tensions with China [1][3]. - The prepared materials for the response were based on previous prime ministers' wording, lacking updated insights into current geopolitical dynamics [3][7]. - Takashi's comments suggested potential military actions in response to a hypothetical situation involving U.S. military intervention, which were not included in the pre-prepared materials [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The Japanese Diet engaged in intense debate regarding Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's previous controversial remarks about Taiwan, with opposition parties expressing strong dissatisfaction over his vague responses [1] Group 1: Political Context - The debate was triggered by questions from opposition party members about Takashi's statements, leading to multiple interruptions during the session [1] - Takashi's responses were characterized by ambiguity, failing to provide clear definitions regarding Japan's "survival crisis situation" and its relation to Taiwan [1] Group 2: Opposition Response - Opposition member Hirota Kazuya demanded a clear explanation from Takashi about whether Taiwan is included in regions closely related to Japan's survival crisis [1] - Despite repeated calls for clarification, Takashi maintained the government's stance without making explicit statements, leading to heightened frustration among opposition lawmakers [1] Group 3: Previous Controversial Remarks - On November 7, Takashi claimed that "a situation in Taiwan" could potentially constitute a "survival crisis situation" for Japan under specific circumstances, which has sparked ongoing domestic controversy [1] - The opposition has consistently sought clearer and more specific explanations from Takashi regarding his remarks, but he has avoided addressing the substantive issues directly [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takichi's unexpected remarks regarding Taiwan potentially constituting a "survival crisis," which were not included in the pre-prepared response materials from the Cabinet Office [2][4]. Group 1 - Takichi's "survival crisis" response occurred during a questioning session in the House of Representatives Budget Committee on November 7, in response to inquiries from Democratic Party member Katsuya Okada [2][4]. - The Cabinet Office's pre-prepared response materials did not contain any mention of the "survival crisis" concept, suggesting that Takichi made the statement based on her own judgment during the session [2][4]. - Following Takichi's remarks, Democratic Party representative Yoshihiko Noda criticized her for acting unilaterally and deviating from the government's pre-prepared content [4]. Group 2 - Democratic Party Senator Kiyomi Tsujimoto publicly requested the release of the Cabinet Office's prepared response materials, which emphasized a desire for peaceful dialogue regarding Taiwan and indicated that the government would assess the situation based on specific circumstances [4]. - Takichi's statement about the possibility of triggering a "survival crisis" was not part of the official materials, indicating it was her personal view rather than a consensus from government officials [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the strong opposition from the Social Democratic Party of Japan, led by President Mizuho Fukushima, against Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan being a potential "survival crisis" for Japan, which Fukushima argues violates the constitution and calls for Takaichi to retract her statements and resign [2][3] - Fukushima emphasizes the illogical nature of Takaichi's statements and warns that Japan, including regions like Okinawa and Kyushu, is at risk of becoming a military stronghold, urging society to prevent war and dangerous policies [2] - The Social Democratic Party, founded in 1945, advocates for a society that respects human dignity and promotes peace, and is currently facing marginalization due to changing political dynamics [3] Group 2 - Mizuho Fukushima, born in December 1955, is a prominent political figure in Japan, serving as a member of the House of Councillors and the leader of the Social Democratic Party, with a strong commitment to peace and opposition to militarization [3] - During her upcoming visit to China in January 2024, Fukushima aims to emphasize the importance of preventing war between Japan and China, advocating for peace diplomacy and opposing the Japanese government's hostile stance towards China [3] - On January 18, 2024, Fukushima and her delegation will visit the China People's Anti-Japanese War Memorial, where they will pay respects and emphasize the message of learning from history to cherish peace [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strong opposition from the leader of the Social Democratic Party of Japan, Mizuho Fukushima, against Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan potentially constituting a "survival crisis" for Japan, arguing that such statements violate the constitution and calling for Takaichi's resignation [5][6]. Group 1: Political Context - Fukushima emphasized that Takaichi's view on Taiwan is illogical and warned that Japan, including Okinawa and Kyushu, is at risk of becoming a military stronghold, urging society to prevent war and dangerous policies [5][6]. - The Social Democratic Party, founded in 1945 and renamed in 1996, advocates for a society that respects human dignity and promotes peace, with a focus on constitutionalism and opposition to militarization [5][6]. Group 2: Personal Background - Mizuho Fukushima, born in December 1955, is a graduate of the University of Tokyo and currently serves as a member of the House of Councillors and the party leader of the Social Democratic Party [6][7]. - In January 2024, Fukushima plans to visit Beijing, expressing a desire to ensure that the people of Japan and China do not get drawn into war, reinforcing the party's commitment to peace and diplomatic relations [6][7].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida emphasizes a pragmatic relationship with Taiwan, stating that Japan has relinquished all rights and authority over Taiwan according to the San Francisco Peace Treaty [2][5]. - Kishida's response to questions about Taiwan's legal status indicates that Japan does not have a definitive stance on the matter, maintaining a non-governmental and practical relationship with Taiwan [5]. - The discussion between Kishida and opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda highlights concerns over Japan's defense posture, particularly regarding the implications of a potential crisis in Taiwan and the responsibilities of the Self-Defense Forces [4][5]. Group 2 - Noda acknowledges the strategic mutual relationship confirmed during the October summit between Japan and China but criticizes Kishida's remarks on Taiwan, suggesting they may have contributed to a cooling of Japan-China relations [4]. - Kishida defends his statements made during the budget committee meeting, asserting that he answered honestly based on specific inquiries regarding Taiwan's situation [5]. - Kishida emphasizes the importance of dialogue in building comprehensive and beneficial relations, asserting that maximizing national interests is his responsibility [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the delicate nature of Japan-China relations, particularly in the context of recent statements made by Japanese politicians regarding Taiwan and military involvement, highlighting the potential for diplomatic tensions [2][4][5][7]. Group 1: Political Statements and Reactions - Former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba criticized the remarks made by Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, Sanae Takaichi, regarding the possibility of Japan exercising collective self-defense in the event of a crisis in Taiwan, emphasizing the need for caution in handling Japan-China relations [2][4]. - Ishiba expressed his disagreement with Takaichi's government rice policy, advocating for increased rice production and questioning the rationale behind the policy changes [4]. - Opposition leader Yoshihiko Noda attributed the deterioration of Japan-China relations to Takaichi's reckless statements, stressing the importance of clear communication of Japan's official stance to avoid misunderstandings [5][7]. Group 2: Diplomatic Context - Noda highlighted the lack of dialogue between Japanese and Chinese leaders during the G20 summit, indicating that a strategic mutual relationship requires ongoing communication at multiple levels to mitigate misunderstandings [7].

Group 1 - China has announced a halt on imports of Japanese seafood, citing the need for further evaluation of monitoring related to nuclear wastewater treatment [2][4] - This decision may be a response to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks in the Diet regarding "Taiwan-related issues" [2][4] - In 2023, China had previously stopped all imports of Japanese seafood due to the discharge of treated nuclear wastewater from Fukushima [4] Group 2 - In June 2025, China indicated plans to reopen imports of seafood from 37 prefectures in Japan, excluding those from Fukushima and Tokyo [4] - As of now, only 3 out of 697 Japanese export facilities have been approved for registration by Chinese authorities [4]