记者从1月19日召开的全国高级法院院长会议上获悉，2025年，全国法院受理审判执行案件3748.6万 件，结案3620万件，同比分别增长10.8%、8.9%。法院对严重危害社会秩序犯罪始终坚持依法严惩、保 持高压态势，审结刑事案件、严重暴力犯罪案件再降11.4%和7.3%。规范涉企执法司法取得积极成果； 破产审判推动2.9万家"僵尸企业"依法出清、1481家企业脱困重生；知识产权民事案件调撤率高出同期 民事案件5.1个百分点，著作权领域批量诉讼占比下降15个百分点，最高法院适用惩罚性赔偿判赔额超 过11亿元；审结涉外民商事、海事案件增长31.6%、30%，联合国大会通过《可转让货物单证公约》， 是首个由我国司法实践规则推动国际贸易制度创新的国际公约；审结环境资源案件增长4.6%，其中刑 事案件下降5.4%。 审结涉民生案件550万余件、增长0.4%，持续治理高额彩礼、知假买假、"卷款跑路"等群众急难愁盼。 入驻县级综治中心实现全覆盖；先行调解结案432.3万件；行政案件上诉率、申请再审率再降3.6、2.6个 百分点。 落实和完善司法责任制，院庭长阅核案件增长18%；案例库收录案例超过5300件，法答网答疑88 ...

副局 2 Kistis H 0 据韩国国际广播电台报道，首尔中央地方法院于21日下午作出一审宣判，将宣布紧急戒严的过程及其后 的整体措施定性为"破坏宪法秩序的内乱"。法院首先认定，2024年12月3日宣布紧急戒严、占领国会和 中央选举管理委员会，以及讨论对部分媒体实施断电、断水等行为，均属于内乱行为。这也是韩国法院 首次就紧急戒严事件是否属于内乱作出判断。 韩联社报道称，判决书提到，韩德洙所涉大部分指控被认定为有罪。韩德洙在从事内乱重要任务、伪造 公文、破坏总统档案以及作伪证等罪名上均成立。韩德洙作为国务总理，负有遵守宪法和法律、尽一切 努力维护并履行宪法的义务，但却因认为内乱可能成功，背弃这一义务而选择参与其中。此外，韩德洙 非但没有揭露内乱真相、承担应有责任，反而在事后出于自身安危考虑，藏匿紧急戒严相关文件，并为 使紧急戒严看似遵循合法程序宣布，制作虚假公文后又将其销毁，并在宪法法院作伪证。 【环球时报特约记者 李梓元】21日，韩国前国务总理韩德洙因协助内乱头目等罪名一审被判有期徒刑 23年。韩国法院以担心毁灭证据为由将韩德洙当庭逮捕，前任国务总理当庭被捕，这在该国宪政史上尚 属首次。 关于量刑，法院表示 ...

2025年，人民法院受理各类审判执行案件（不含先行调解成功案件）3700余万件，同比增长超过10%。 人民法院更加严格贯彻落实立案登记制度要求，一审案件收案数量大幅上升的同时，二审和再审案件收 案数量同比均下降，一审裁判被二审改判、发回重审的比例和生效裁判被再审改判、发回重审的比例同 比均下降，人民法院裁判的公正性、稳定性、权威性稳步提升。 2025年，人民法院受理刑事一审案件100余万件，判处生效被告人140余万人，案件数量和人数同比均下 降。 受理民商事一审案件2000余万件，同比上升超过11%。受理一审知识产权民事案件47万余件，同比上升 超过5%。受理环境资源民事一审案件16万余件，同比上升超过11%。 受理涉外民商事一审案件约4万件，同比大幅上升近五成，人民法院不断提升涉外司法效能，依法平等 保护中外当事人合法权益，有效服务"一带一路"高质量发展和高水平对外开放。 2025年，人民法院受理首次执行案件数量超过1000万件，同比上升超过15%。办理保全执行案件580余 万件，同比上升近5%，执行到位金额2.16万亿元，有力兑现当事人胜诉权益。 2025年，人民法院受理行政一审案件33万余件，同比上升超 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military actions by the U.S. against Venezuela, including the arrest of President Maduro and the implications for U.S. oil companies regarding investments in Venezuela's oil infrastructure [2]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - On January 3, President Maduro was taken to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in New York and subsequently detained in a Brooklyn facility [2]. - The U.S. government has accused Maduro and his wife of engaging in "deadly drug terrorism" against the U.S. [2]. - President Trump announced that the U.S. will "manage" Venezuela until a "safe" transition is implemented [2]. Group 2: Political Reactions - The Venezuelan Supreme Court appointed Vice President Delcy Rodriguez as acting president following Maduro's arrest [2]. - Chilean President Boric condemned the U.S. military actions, warning that it could set a precedent for intervention in other countries [2]. Group 3: Oil Industry Implications - The White House has requested major U.S. oil companies to invest in repairing Venezuela's oil extraction infrastructure [2].

Core Points - The U.S. President Trump announced the capture of Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife during military actions against Venezuela [1] - Maduro's plane has arrived at a military base in New York [2] - The U.S. Department of Justice has filed charges against Maduro and his family, with a court appearance expected next week [4] Group 1: Military Action and Political Implications - Trump stated that the U.S. will continue to "manage" Venezuela until a safe and proper power transition can occur, without setting a timeline for returning control to Venezuelans [10] - The U.S. military had been preparing for this operation for several months, with support from various intelligence agencies [12][13] - Trump emphasized deep involvement in Venezuela's oil industry and the leadership transition, indicating potential leadership by opposition figure Maria Corina Machado [16] Group 2: Legal Charges and International Reactions - Maduro faces multiple charges including drug trafficking and possession of weapons, with a trial set to occur in New York [21][20] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed strong condemnation of the U.S. military actions, citing violations of international law and threats to regional peace [22] - Chilean President Boric criticized the U.S. actions, warning that such interventions could set a dangerous precedent for other nations [22]

Core Viewpoint - The article narrates the complex legal case of Guo Ming, who was wrongfully convicted of theft involving a BMW car owned by his sister, leading to a lengthy imprisonment and eventual exoneration after a series of legal proceedings [2][3][34]. Group 1: Case Background - Guo Ming was sentenced to 10 years in prison for allegedly stealing a BMW car belonging to his sister, which he had driven back to Beijing [2][27]. - The car was purchased by Guo Ming's sister, Guo Yuan, but was financed by Guo Ming and his wife, Li Guanjing, who later sold the car without Guo Ming's consent [8][19]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - After serving over four years, Guo Ming's case was sent back for retrial, and he was released on bail in August 2025 [3][34]. - The prosecution's case was weakened by the lack of evidence supporting the claim that Guo Ming intended to steal the car, leading to a decision of non-prosecution in December 2025 [34]. Group 3: Financial Transactions - Guo Ming and Li Guanjing had borrowed money from Guo Yuan, which was used for the car's down payment, complicating the ownership claims [8][9]. - Li Guanjing's financial transactions with Chen Lu, who was involved in the car sale, raised questions about the legitimacy of the sale and the ownership of the vehicle [19][20]. Group 4: Family Dynamics - The case highlights the strained relationship between Guo Ming and Li Guanjing, marked by disputes over finances and the custody of their child [6][7]. - Li Guanjing's actions during the divorce proceedings, including the sale of the car and subsequent financial dealings, were pivotal in the legal conflict [26][27].

Overall Judicial Work Summary - In the first nine months of 2025, courts nationwide accepted 32.257 million cases, a decrease of 9.17% compared to the same period last year [1] - The quality of judicial management improved, with a 0.06 decrease in the case-to-judgment ratio and a 0.96 percentage point decrease in the appeal rate [1] - The number of unresolved cases for over two years decreased by 28.08%, enhancing public satisfaction with the judiciary [1] Case Filing and Mediation - Courts handled 4.782 million pre-litigation mediation cases, with a success rate of 312.8 million, showing significant growth [2] - The automatic compliance rate for successful mediation cases exceeded 90%, indicating effective dispute resolution [2] - 57% of parties submitted their lawsuits online, with a 14.7 percentage point increase in satisfaction with the filing process [2] Criminal Case Handling - Courts accepted 804,000 first-instance criminal cases, a decline of 11.61%, with 1.048 million defendants sentenced, down 10.22% [3] - Cases related to food safety crimes decreased by 14.84%, while cases of fraud increased by 7.8% [3] - New legal interpretations were issued to combat telecom fraud and online gambling [3] Civil and Commercial Case Handling - Courts accepted 18.954 million first-instance civil and commercial cases, an increase of 37.45% year-on-year [4] - Labor dispute cases rose by 37.5%, and cases related to company disputes surged by 70.21% [4] - The number of intellectual property civil cases increased by 33.78%, reflecting a focus on protecting innovation [4] Administrative Case Handling - Administrative first-instance cases rose by 17.49%, with a decrease in appeal and retrial application rates [5] - Courts supported administrative agencies in fulfilling their duties and resolving administrative disputes effectively [6] Execution Case Management - Courts accepted 8.065 million execution cases, an increase of 16.72%, with execution completion and effectiveness rates at 39.54% and 51.35% respectively [6] - Online judicial auctions generated 256.45 billion yuan, with a transaction rate of 62.02%, showing steady improvement in asset disposal [6] - The number of new entries into the dishonesty list decreased by 2.45%, while credit restoration efforts helped 1.97 million individuals return to the market [6]

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Court reported a 9.17% decrease in the total number of cases accepted from January to September 2025 compared to the same period last year, with a total of 32.257 million cases accepted [1] Criminal Cases - The number of first-instance criminal cases accepted was 804,000, a year-on-year decrease of 11.61%, with 1.048 million defendants sentenced, down 10.22% [2] - There was a notable decrease in serious criminal cases, with 77,000 sentenced to more than five years in prison, down 4.86% [2] - Cases related to food safety crimes saw a decline, with 2,719 cases accepted, down 14.84%, while cases involving food that does not meet safety standards increased by 63.11% [2] - Fraud cases increased by 7.8%, with 71,000 cases accepted [2] Civil and Commercial Cases - The number of first-instance civil and commercial cases accepted rose significantly to 18.954 million, an increase of 37.45% compared to the previous year [2] - Labor dispute cases increased by 37.5%, with 648,000 cases accepted [3] - Company-related disputes saw a substantial rise of 70.21%, with 147,000 cases accepted [3] - Securities disputes also increased by 63.22%, with 20,000 cases accepted [3] - Intellectual property civil cases rose by 33.78%, totaling 454,000 cases accepted [3] Environmental and International Cases - Environmental resource civil cases increased by 49.79%, with 170,000 cases accepted [4] - International civil and commercial cases rose by 59.73%, with 35,000 cases accepted [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][2] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss calculation model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][2] - The "Hundred Questions in Court" model has been implemented to systematically summarize details from numerous securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [2][3] Group 2 - The challenges in financial trials are increasingly characterized by the collective nature of cases, which complicates procedures and raises costs for parties involved [3] - A "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been explored to efficiently resolve collective financial disputes by allowing representative parties to express their demands and by providing model judgments for typical cases [3] - In internet trials, the application of complex technologies and the rapid evolution of new business models present significant challenges for judges, particularly in cases involving online misinformation and intellectual property [4][5]