Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released typical cases to enhance judicial services and support the coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, aiming to establish it as a model area for Chinese-style modernization [1] Case Summaries Case 1: Land Lease Dispute - The case involves a land lease dispute between Beijing's prison management and a Tianjin aquaculture company regarding a piece of land in Beijing's Qinghe Farm, which is geographically located in Tianjin [2][3] - The court ruled that the Tianjin company must vacate the land and pay usage fees, while the prison management must compensate for the trees on the land [3][4] Case 2: Patent Infringement - A patent infringement case was filed by a designer against a trading company and its online store for selling a similar children's toy without permission, claiming damages of 50,000 RMB [6][7] - The court found no infringement as the designs were deemed sufficiently distinct, leading to the dismissal of the case [7][8] Case 3: Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation - A public interest lawsuit was initiated against a shipping company for a sunken vessel that posed environmental risks in the Tianjin-Hebei sea area, with a ruling mandating the company to recover the sunken ship [9][10] - The execution faced challenges due to the complexity of the recovery operation, but ultimately, the ship was successfully retrieved without environmental contamination [10][11][12] Case 4: Financing Lease Dispute - A financing lease dispute arose between a drone company and a financial leasing company due to delayed payments, leading to a court case [13][14] - The court facilitated a mediation process that resulted in a mutually agreeable payment plan, allowing the drone company to continue operations [14][15] Case 5: Construction Contract Dispute - A construction contract dispute occurred between a lighting engineering company and a real estate developer over unpaid project fees after quality issues were identified [16][17] - The court employed a third-party mediation organization to resolve the dispute, leading to a successful agreement between the parties [17][18] Case 6: Illegal Fishing Case - Four individuals were prosecuted for illegal fishing during a prohibited period, resulting in a court ruling that included both criminal penalties and a requirement to restore the fish population [19][20] - The case highlighted the collaborative judicial efforts between Beijing and Hebei courts to protect aquatic resources and promote ecological restoration [20][21]