Group 1 - The Biden administration has not yet established a new policy order or reshaped electoral politics, despite passing significant legislation like the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act [1][10] - The concept of "post-neoliberalism" indicates the difficulty in achieving a new consensus, as both left and right coalitions are unprepared for the challenges posed by geopolitical, economic, and technological competition [1][2] - The shift from a Fordist economy dominated by large manufacturers to a "fractured" economy driven by intellectual property and financial rents has profound implications for corporate and investor behavior [3][4] Group 2 - Neoliberalism has provided ideological justification for the shift towards a fractured economy, with policy changes acting as key catalysts, such as the reduction of tariffs and the weakening of antitrust laws [5][6] - The hollowing out of manufacturing and the abandonment of capital-intensive industries have weakened the U.S.'s innovation capacity and economic standing, leading to internal tensions and a loss of technological leadership [6][10] - The current political landscape reflects a departure from traditional political projects, with both parties struggling to propose coherent policy agendas, resulting in a fragmented political environment [15][16] Group 3 - The environmental movement has shifted to a more prominent role in national industrial policy, yet it struggles to transcend neoliberal frameworks and mobilize a broad political project [22][23] - The rise of "woke" politics has polarized discussions, making it difficult to form a consensus around economic issues, as both progressives and conservatives cling to their respective narratives [24][25] - The lack of a unifying political project has led to a focus on individual self-fulfillment rather than collective governance, complicating the potential for a new post-neoliberal consensus [27][28]