Core Viewpoint - The recent increase in U.S. military presence in the Caribbean has raised concerns about a potential military strike on Venezuela, with regional leaders advocating for peace and dialogue instead of conflict [1][5]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - U.S. military officials have been visiting the Caribbean, discussing regional challenges such as drug trafficking and organized crime, while emphasizing the need for defense cooperation [3]. - Since September, the U.S. has intensified military operations in the Caribbean under the guise of a "drug sweep," sinking 21 vessels and deploying approximately 15,000 personnel, marking the largest military deployment in decades [3][4]. - The U.S. has designated Venezuela's "Sunshine Group" as a foreign terrorist organization, claiming it is involved in drug smuggling, which Venezuela disputes as a fabricated excuse for military action [4]. Group 2: Regional Reactions - The Secretary-General of the Organization of American States has publicly opposed war, advocating for dialogue and restraint between the U.S. and Venezuela [5]. - Cuban officials have criticized the U.S. military buildup as aggressive and exaggerated, warning of potential violence and instability in the region [5]. - A recent poll indicated that 70% of Americans oppose military action against Venezuela, with 75% believing the government should provide evidence of drug trafficking by the targeted vessels [6].

Core Viewpoint - Iranian officials believe that a phone call from President Trump to Israeli leaders could easily halt the ongoing conflict and allow for diplomatic discussions to resume [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Iran's Position on Diplomacy** - Iran is open to peaceful dialogue, whether direct or indirect, and emphasizes that negotiations cannot occur while Israel continues its attacks [1] - **Nuclear Enrichment Stance** - Iran maintains its position against halting nuclear enrichment activities but indicates that concessions could be possible under certain circumstances [1]

Group 1 - Indian Prime Minister Modi made a strong statement against Pakistan, asserting that Pakistan will not receive water from rivers that India claims rights to [1][3] - Modi emphasized that Pakistan's economy and military will pay a high price for any territorial infringement against India, indicating a hardline stance [3][5] - The Indian military launched "Operation Cinnabar" on May 7, targeting nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which led to a military response from Pakistan [5] Group 2 - Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Shafqat Ali Khan, criticized Modi's remarks as provocative and aimed at inciting regional tensions for narrow political gains [3][5] - Khan stated that Pakistan has been a cooperative partner in global counter-terrorism efforts and rejected any insinuation linking Pakistan to terrorism as factually incorrect and misleading [5] - Both countries announced a ceasefire following military actions, with Pakistan claiming to have targeted over 20 Indian military sites in retaliation [5]