俄罗斯联邦安全会议副主席梅德韦杰夫称赞美国总统特朗普是一位寻求和平的高效领导人，但他补充 说，莫斯科没有发现特朗普声称已部署到俄罗斯海岸的核潜艇的任何踪迹。 特朗普曾表示希望被后人铭记为"和平缔造者"，他多次表示结束俄乌冲突的和平协议已近在咫尺，新一 轮美俄乌谈判计划于本周在阿布扎比举行。 当被问及特朗普对俄罗斯是好是坏，以及关于特朗普是某种俄罗斯特工的未经证实的猜测时，梅德韦杰 夫表示，美国人民选择了特朗普，莫斯科尊重这一决定。 梅德韦杰夫赞扬了特朗普对抗美国建制派的勇气，并称这位美国总统有时"鲁莽"的风格是"有效的"。 "他是一个情绪化的人，但另一方面，人们通常提到的由他的活动造成的混乱并不完全是事实，"他在莫 斯科郊外的官邸接受采访时表示。 "特朗普希望作为和平缔造者载入史册，他真的很努力，"梅德韦杰夫说。"他真的在努力做到这一点。 这就是为什么与美国人的接触变得更加富有成效。" 特朗普的潜艇威胁 梅德韦杰夫表示，理解特朗普的关键在于他的商业背景，他打趣说没有所谓的"前商人"，这是借用了俄 罗斯的一个老笑话，即没有所谓的"前克格勃特工"。 特朗普在去年8月表示，他已下令两艘美国核潜艇向俄罗斯靠近，以回应 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights President Trump's assertion that his personal "moral standards and will" are the only constraints on his military actions globally, dismissing the need for international law [3][4]. Group 1: Military Actions and Global Influence - Trump claims that he can freely use military, economic, or political means to reinforce U.S. hegemony, suggesting that national power should dictate international relations rather than laws or treaties [3]. - Under Trump's administration, the U.S. has conducted military strikes in seven countries, matching the total number of strikes during Obama's eight-year term, with over 620 airstrikes ordered since his second term began [5]. - The U.S. has a historical pattern of military interventions, with 392 recorded since its founding, indicating a trend of increasing military engagement post-1950 [6]. Group 2: Political and Social Implications - Experts warn that the U.S.'s misuse of military force and disregard for international law could lead to regional instability, exacerbating issues like illegal immigration and drug trafficking [6][7]. - The perception of low costs and difficulties associated with military interventions may encourage the Trump administration to pursue more aggressive actions in the future [6]. - Historical analysis suggests that rapid military actions often lead to disastrous outcomes, raising concerns about the long-term political consequences of such interventions [7].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump claims to be a "peace maker," asserting that he has ended six conflicts since taking office, with the Ukraine-Russia conflict being the seventh [1][3] Group 1: Claims of Conflict Resolution - Trump cites resolutions in conflicts between Israel and Iran, Congo and Rwanda, Cambodia and Thailand, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia [1] - Supporters believe Trump's actions merit a Nobel Peace Prize, which he has pursued for years [1] - The Axios news outlet acknowledges some diplomatic breakthroughs during Trump's second term, such as the peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan [1] Group 2: Criticism of Claims - The Guardian argues that Trump's claims of conflict resolution are exaggerated, citing ongoing violence in Congo and unresolved disputes between Egypt and Ethiopia regarding the Nile dam [3] - The report highlights that India denies Trump's involvement in the India-Pakistan ceasefire agreement, and Serbia refutes any plans for conflict with Kosovo [3] - Trump's inconsistent stance on whether to pursue peace agreements or ceasefires is noted, particularly in relation to the Ukraine conflict [3]