Workflow
四维提升路径
icon
Search documents
深圳科技创新维度居全球第四
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-10-13 23:15
Core Insights - The "Global Ocean City Competitiveness Index Report (2025)" was released, highlighting Shenzhen's strong position in technological innovation, ranking fourth globally in this dimension, which supports its goal of becoming a "global ocean center city" [2][5] Global Ocean City Competitiveness - Shenzhen ranks 11th globally in ocean city competitiveness, with Qingdao at 16th, showcasing China's significant presence in the global ocean competition [3][5] - The report identifies a clear "four-tier" differentiation in global ocean city competitiveness, with London, Singapore, and New York leading the first tier, while cities like Tokyo, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Sydney form the top echelon of global ocean economies [3][4] Technological Innovation in Shenzhen - Shenzhen's innovation capabilities in marine electronic information, high-end equipment manufacturing, and underwater robotics are crucial for its ambition to become a global ocean center city [4][5] - The report emphasizes that Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Qingdao are the leading ocean economic circles in China, with Shanghai ranked second globally in economic vitality and maintaining the highest port cargo throughput [4][5] Recommendations for Chinese Ocean Cities - The report proposes a "four-dimensional enhancement path" for Chinese ocean cities, focusing on building an open economic ecosystem, creating a technology innovation hub, deepening global governance participation, and innovating green low-carbon models [6] - It predicts that from 2025 to 2030, technology-driven efficiency revolutions and green low-carbon transformations will dominate ocean city competitiveness, with new industries like marine data centers and blue carbon economies emerging rapidly [6]
上海香港跻身全球海洋城市十强
第一财经· 2025-10-12 06:35
Core Viewpoint - The latest assessment report on the comprehensive competitiveness of ocean cities indicates that Shanghai and Hong Kong rank among the top ten global ocean cities, with Shenzhen and Qingdao also making it into the top 20 [3][4]. Group 1: Global Ocean City Competitiveness - The report evaluates 60 global ocean cities based on five dimensions: economic vitality, technological innovation, maritime services, international influence, and urban governance [4]. - The global ocean city competitiveness shows a clear distribution into four tiers, with London, Singapore, and New York leading the first tier as benchmarks for development [4][6]. - The second tier includes cities like Shenzhen, Houston, and Copenhagen, while the third tier consists of cities such as Helsinki and Osaka, and the fourth tier includes cities with weaker foundations like Dongguan and Ho Chi Minh City [6][7]. Group 2: China's Ocean Cities - China has 16 cities in the second and third tiers, representing over half of the total, highlighting the significant "Chinese power" in global ocean competition [7]. - Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Qingdao are identified as the three leading "ocean economic circle leaders" in China, with Shanghai ranking second globally in economic vitality and having the highest port cargo throughput [7]. - Shenzhen ranks fourth globally in technological innovation, supporting its ambition to become a "global ocean center city" through advancements in marine electronics and underwater robotics [7]. Group 3: Future Directions and Predictions - The report suggests a "four-dimensional enhancement path" for Chinese ocean cities, focusing on building an open economic ecosystem, becoming innovation hubs, deepening global governance participation, and innovating green low-carbon models [8]. - It predicts that from 2025 to 2030, technology-driven efficiency revolutions and green low-carbon transitions will dominate ocean city competition, with new business models like marine data centers and blue carbon economies emerging rapidly [8].
亚太集体崛起!《全球海洋城市竞争力指数报告(2025)》发布
Core Insights - The report titled "Global Ocean City Competitiveness Index Report (2025)" reveals the competitive landscape of global ocean cities, highlighting a clear "four-tier" differentiation in competitiveness [1][4] - Major cities like London, Singapore, and New York lead the first tier, while Shenzhen ranks 11th globally, marking it as a key player in China's southern marine economy [1][4] Group 1: Global Ocean City Competitiveness - The report evaluates 60 global ocean cities based on five dimensions: economic vitality, technological innovation, maritime services, international influence, and urban governance [1] - The first tier includes cities such as London, Singapore, and New York, which excel across all metrics, while the second tier features cities like Shenzhen, Houston, and Copenhagen, which have notable strengths in specific areas [4][5] Group 2: Shenzhen's Position - Shenzhen ranks 11th overall, with a strong performance in technological innovation (4th) and economic vitality (7th), establishing itself as a leader in China's southern marine economy [1][6] - The city's innovation capabilities in marine electronics, high-end equipment manufacturing, and underwater robotics support its goal of becoming a "global ocean center city" [6][11] Group 3: Trends and Future Directions - The report indicates a significant rise of Asia-Pacific cities in the global ocean city rankings, with Chinese cities like Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Qingdao emerging as influential players [6][8] - The future competitiveness of ocean cities will hinge on building a "hard infrastructure + soft rules + new ecology" framework, emphasizing the need for breakthroughs in governance and ecological development [8][11] Group 4: Recommendations for Chinese Ocean Cities - The report suggests four pathways for enhancing global ocean competitiveness: creating an open economic ecosystem, fostering technological innovation, increasing participation in global governance, and innovating green low-carbon models [8][11] - Specific strategies for Shenzhen include integrating deep-sea equipment with renewable energy, establishing a marine resource trading center, and participating in international cooperation projects to enhance its global influence [11][12]