运镜忽闪，音乐劲爆，舞姿统一，屏幕上不停出现看客们打赏的火箭和嘉年华，这就是号称电子宠物，赛博夜店，当代教司坊的团播。 "差点忘了以前是干嘛的"话题火了大半个月，干团播已经成了当代年轻人口中的时代风口和暴富捷径。 不论之前是学生还是奶茶店小妹，是快递小哥还是公司职员，甚至还有外形条件不错保养得宜的叔叔阿姨，只要换上表演服装，加上网红妆效和十层滤 镜，配合灯光和运镜。扭腰、扫腿，就能获得不少追捧和打赏，每个月工资至少上万。 话题的爆火导致很多高考毕业生和大学生动不动把"学习有什么用，还不如去干团播"的话挂在口边，殊不知"金字塔顶金光闪，脚下人梯血汗干"。 "做团播暴富"不过是互联网造富神话下的又一波收割，年轻人幻想干团播财富自由的同时，团播公司也正用年轻人来实现暴富。 别有用心的选人标准 每一步都在筛选耗材 凌晨4点，孙琦刚刚从刺眼喧嚣的直播间下播，做完今天她在这家传媒公司就整整干满两个月了。 "琦琦，老板找你。" 运营下班前对正在卸妆的孙琦来了一句，她只能拖着疲惫的身子去应付休息了一天才刚刚上班的老板。 老板今天找她的目的是签合同，高强度跳了6个小时舞蹈的孙琦头昏脑涨，现在感觉每个字都在她眼前跳舞。 孙琦想把 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of group broadcasting (团播) has become a popular trend among young people, perceived as a shortcut to wealth, but it often leads to exploitation and financial pitfalls for participants [1][4][5] Group 1: Recruitment and Exploitation - Group broadcasting companies employ deceptive recruitment practices, targeting inexperienced and financially vulnerable individuals, often with no educational or age requirements [4][5][7] - The selection criteria favor young candidates from less privileged backgrounds, as they are less likely to have support or knowledge about contractual obligations, making them easier to exploit [7][8] - Many young recruits, like Sun Qi, find themselves trapped in contracts with significant penalties for leaving, often amounting to tens of thousands of yuan [2][4][20] Group 2: Financial Burdens and Medical Procedures - Participants in group broadcasting are often coerced into taking loans for cosmetic procedures, which are presented as necessary for their job performance [12][13] - The financial burden of these procedures can lead to significant debt, with some individuals forced to take out loans to cover costs, further entrenching them in a cycle of financial dependency [12][13] - The industry creates an environment where young people feel pressured to conform to unrealistic beauty standards, often leading to health risks from excessive cosmetic procedures [12][13] Group 3: Company Practices and Legal Issues - Many small to medium-sized broadcasting companies have a short lifespan, typically around 1.5 to 2 years, often leaving employees with unpaid wages and legal disputes over contract violations [14][20] - Companies employ systematic methods to force employees into breach of contract situations, which allows them to claim damages and avoid financial responsibility [14][20] - The culture within these companies often includes bullying and manipulation, further isolating individuals who attempt to resist or leave [19][20]