责编：杨喻程 校对：李凌锋 券中社 × 券商中国 券 中 社 扫码下载券中社APP 扫码关注券商中国公众号 quanshangcn qzs.stcn.com 舞中 券中社APP 券 商 中 国 是 证 券 市 场 权 威 媒 体 《 证 券 时 报 》 旗 下 新 媒 体 , 券 商 中 国 对 该 平 台 所 刊 载 的 原 创 内 容 享 有 著 作 权 , 未 经 授 权 禁 止 转 载 ， 否 则 将 追 究 相 应 法 律 责 任 。 看券商中国 知天下财经 据央视新闻3月3日消息，上海合作组织（以下称"上合组织"）成员国对中东地区事态发展和伊朗伊斯兰 共和国遭受武装袭击表示严重关切。 上合组织成员国认为，使用武力不可接受，支持根据国际法和联合国宪章宗旨原则，在对话、相互尊重和 兼顾各方合法利益基础上解决当前冲突是唯一出路。 上合组织成员国强调，必须确保伊朗国家主权、安全和领土完整，支持各方保持克制，立即停止导致局势 进一步恶化的行动。上合组织成员国强烈呼吁联合国及其安理会立即采取措施，应对破坏国际和平与安全 的行为。 上合组织成员国向此次袭击中的遇难家庭表示深切哀悼，向伊朗政府和人民表示声援和支持 ...

转自：扬子晚报 环球网援引美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）、法新社等外媒报道，阿联酋、埃及、约旦、印度尼西亚、 巴基斯坦、土耳其、沙特阿拉伯、卡塔尔、科威特、阿曼、巴林、黎巴嫩、叙利亚、巴勒斯坦及伊斯兰 合作组织、阿拉伯国家联盟、海湾合作委员会22日发表联合声明，谴责美国驻以色列大使迈克·赫卡比 近日所谓"以色列有权控制整个中东地区"的言论。 声明指出，这种极端言论预示着严重后果，并通过敌视本地区国家和人民、削弱国际秩序基础，威胁国 际和平与安全。"美国国务院应当就这一言论阐明其立场。" 约旦外交部21日也发表声明，谴责美国驻以色列大使迈克·赫卡比关于以色列有权控制整个中东地区的 言论。 约旦外交部发言人福阿德·马贾利在声明中说，赫卡比的言论"荒谬且具有挑衅性"，违反了外交惯例， 侵犯了地区各国的主权，公然违反了国际法和《联合国宪章》，与美国政府有关立场相悖。 马贾利强调，各方应齐心协力稳定加沙局势，而不是发表不负责任、不具法律效力、导致局势升级的荒 谬言论。 美国驻以色列大使迈克·赫卡比 （图据CFP） 来源：政事儿 声明称，赫卡比的言论是"危险且具有煽动性的"；赫卡比的言论"公然违反国际法"，并威胁地区稳定。 ...

本月3日，尼日利亚夸拉州卡亚马地方政府辖区两个村落遭遇武装分子袭击，导致超过百人死亡。 尼日利亚政府随后认定该起事件为恐怖主义袭击。尼总统提努布则下令向事发地部署军队。 在2月17日，联合国安理会发表新闻声明，以最强烈措辞谴责这一恐袭事件。 △2月17 日，联合国安理会发布新闻声明，以最强烈措辞谴责尼日利亚发生的致超百人死亡的恐袭事件。 安理会声明说，此次袭击造成至少100人死亡，并造成财产损失。安理会成员向遇难者家属以及尼日利 亚政府和人民致以深切同情和诚挚慰问，祝愿伤者早日康复，并希望被绑架人员安全获释。 安理会（资料图） △联合国 声明重申，一切形式和表现的恐怖主义是对国际和平与安全最严重的威胁之一。安理会成员强调，必须 追究恐怖袭击实施者、组织者以及资助者和支持者的责任，并将其绳之以法。 声明敦促各国根据国际法义务和相关安理会决议，与尼日利亚政府积极合作，共同打击恐怖主义。 2月3日 尼日利亚两个村落遭武装袭击 超百人死亡 当地时间2月4日，尼日利亚红十字会消息人士表示，尼中部夸拉州卡亚马地方政府辖区两个村落3日晚 遭武装人员袭击，仅截至4日，死亡人数已超过100人。 （资料图） 当地时间2月4日晚间 ...

Core Viewpoint - The expiration of the U.S.-Russia New START treaty marks a significant turning point, potentially leading to an unprecedented and extremely dangerous period in global nuclear competition [1] Group 1: Treaty Expiration - The New START treaty officially expired on February 5, leading to a lack of binding constraints on the strategic nuclear arsenals of both Russia and the United States [1] - This situation represents the first time in over half a century that there are no limitations on the strategic nuclear capabilities of these two nations [1] Group 2: Implications for Global Security - The Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, emphasized that the treaty's expiration poses a severe challenge to international peace and security [1] - Experts warn that the failure of this treaty could escalate the risk of a nuclear arms race, heightening global tensions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The expiration of the US-Russia New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty is a serious moment for international peace and security [1] Group 1 - UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the critical implications of the treaty's expiration for global stability [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses concern over the security risks arising from the situation in Aleppo and northeastern Syria, emphasizing the need for adherence to ceasefire agreements and a political resolution that aligns with the interests of the Syrian people [2] Group 1: Security Concerns - The Chinese representative highlights the worrying developments in Aleppo and northeastern Syria, which pose security risks [2] - Reports indicate that a group of ISIS members escaped from prison during the chaos in Hasakah province [2] Group 2: Political Resolution - China calls for all factions in Syria to engage in dialogue and negotiations to advance the political reconciliation process [2] - The Chinese government reiterates its support for Syria's sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity, opposing external interference [2] Group 3: Counter-Terrorism Efforts - China firmly opposes all forms of terrorism, stating that any terrorist activity is a severe threat to international peace and security [2] - The Chinese representative urges the Syrian transitional government to fulfill its international obligations and take effective measures to combat all internationally recognized terrorist organizations, including the East Turkestan Islamic Movement [2] Group 4: Economic Recovery and Development - The international community shares a common expectation for Syria to steadily advance inclusive political transition, firmly combat terrorism, protect minority rights, and restore the economy for sustainable development [2] - China expresses its willingness to work with the international community to help Syria achieve security, stability, and development [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is deemed unqualified to assume responsibilities for maintaining international peace and security, and to be a permanent member of the UN Security Council due to its historical actions and current political stance [2][3][6][7]. Group 1: Historical Context - The UN Security Council is described as the core of the international collective security mechanism, crucial for maintaining post-war international order and peace [2][6]. - The Tokyo Trials, which took place 80 years ago, served to punish Japanese war criminals and uphold international justice, acting as a strong warning against the resurgence of militarism and expansionist ambitions [2][6]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - Japanese right-wing forces are accused of beautifying their invasion history and denying historical atrocities such as the Nanjing Massacre and the forced conscription of "comfort women" and laborers [2][6]. - Current Japanese leaders have been noted for visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, a symbol of militarism, and for making provocative statements regarding Taiwan and nuclear policies, indicating a push towards re-militarization [2][6][7]. Group 3: China's Position - China, as a permanent member of the Security Council, expresses its commitment to defending the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, advocating for unity and constructive roles in maintaining international peace [3][7]. - China supports necessary and reasonable reforms of the Security Council to enhance its authority and efficiency, emphasizing the importance of increasing the representation and voice of developing countries [3][7].

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, condemning the U.S. military action on January 3 and asserting that Venezuela's oil belongs to its people [1][10]. Group 1: UN's Position - The UN Secretary-General's representative emphasized the need for all parties to respect international law, particularly the UN Charter, and expressed deep concern over the military action that did not comply with these rules [3]. - Multiple members of the Security Council condemned the U.S. military action as an act of aggression against Venezuela [3][4]. - The UN reiterated that Venezuela's oil resources are owned by the Venezuelan people, similar to the stance on Syria's oil [10]. Group 2: Reactions from Member States - The Russian representative at the UN condemned the U.S. actions as a criminal act and a violation of international law [4]. - The Pakistani representative warned that such actions set a dangerous precedent and threaten the global legal framework [6]. - The Colombian representative stated that any form of aggression lacks legitimacy and should not be used to resolve unresolved situations [6][8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military actions taken by the United States against Venezuela, highlighting the international legal concerns raised by the United Nations Secretary-General and the implications for Venezuela's political stability and sovereignty [4][9]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions and International Response - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, with Secretary-General Guterres expressing concern over the violation of international law [4][9]. - Guterres emphasized that the use of force against any nation's territorial integrity or political independence is prohibited under the UN Charter, urging all member states to adhere to its principles [4][9]. - The U.S. military operation on January 3 has been criticized as a dangerous precedent, with various international leaders condemning the actions as a form of state terrorism [9]. Group 2: Situation in Venezuela - Following the U.S. military actions, many shops in Caracas were closed, and there was a noticeable decrease in traffic, indicating a state of unrest and fear among the populace [5]. - The Venezuelan government, led by acting President Rodriguez, convened a ministerial council to strategize responses to the U.S. actions, promoting peace and national unity [5][6]. - The Venezuelan Defense Ministry announced a state of full military readiness to counter perceived imperialist aggression, asserting the country's commitment to its sovereignty [6]. Group 3: Maduro's Legal Situation - Venezuelan President Maduro was taken to a federal court in New York, where he faces charges related to drug trafficking, which the U.S. has labeled as a terrorist organization [8]. - Despite the serious allegations, experts have pointed out the lack of direct evidence linking Maduro to specific drug trafficking activities, raising questions about the motivations behind the U.S. actions [8]. - The focus of U.S. rhetoric has shifted from drug-related issues to oil interests, suggesting that economic motivations may underlie the military actions against Venezuela [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent military actions by the United States against Venezuela, highlighting the strong condemnations from Russia and Iran regarding these actions, which they view as violations of international law and sovereignty [1]. Group 1: Russia's Response - The Russian Foreign Ministry condemned the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, labeling them as armed aggression and expressing deep concern over the situation [1]. - Russia emphasized the importance of preventing further escalation and advocated for dialogue as a means to resolve conflicts between nations [1]. - The Russian embassy in Caracas is operating normally and maintaining close contact with local authorities and Russian citizens, with no reports of casualties among Russian nationals so far [1]. Group 2: Iran's Position - The Iranian Foreign Ministry also issued a strong condemnation of the U.S. military attack on Venezuela, asserting that it blatantly violates Venezuela's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1]. - Iran characterized the U.S. actions as aggression that undermines regional and international peace and security, calling for action from relevant countries and international organizations to halt the illegal invasion [1]. - Iran reaffirmed its support for Venezuela's legitimate rights to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity [1].