当地时间15日，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃表示，美国在加勒比地区和拉丁美洲加强军事活动正在对国际 和平与安全造成威胁。伊朗敦促美方尊重委内瑞拉的主权和领土完整，呼吁联合国采取行动以防止国际 和平与安全受到破坏。 （文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 加勒比地区局势近来持续紧张，美国陈兵加勒比海，并宣布发动"南方之矛"军事行动，以清除西半球的 所谓"毒品恐怖分子"。 ...

古特雷斯说，有幸坐在安理会桌边的人负有责任：不辜负民众的信任、把资源投入发展与和平，而 不是用于战争。过去80年，安理会在维护国际和平与安全方面发挥了重要作用，至少避免了大国之间的 战争。但与此同时，安理会部分成员违反《联合国宪章》的原则。这样的情况不仅影响安理会发挥作 用，还会侵蚀整个联合国的信誉。 古特雷斯说，安理会应该倾听民众对于和平与安全的呼声。联合国徽章上没有胜利者的月桂花环， 只有和平缔造者的橄榄枝。古特雷斯希望安理会改革成为一个能够应对未来80年挑战、为每个人带来正 义与安全的机构。 新华社联合国10月24日电（记者 尚绪谦）今年10月24日是《联合国宪章》生效80周年纪念日。联 合国秘书长古特雷斯当天在安理会"展望联合国未来"公开辩论会上发表讲话，敦促安理会不辜负大众对 于和平的期望。 正在越南访问的古特雷斯通过视频发表讲话。他用历史上的一个小插曲提示安理会勿忘维护国际和 平与安全的初衷。1946年春，安理会投票箱首次启用时作开箱检查，大家惊奇地发现里面竟然有一张纸 条，上面是票箱制作人保罗·安东尼奥的留言：作为票箱制作人，我可以先投一票吗？希望通过你们崇 高的努力为全世界的人们带来永久和平。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, emphasized the need for the international community to revive multilateralism to maintain international peace and security, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the United Nations [1] Group 1: Historical Context - Fu Cong highlighted the significance of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, which established the fundamental principles of international relations as outlined in the UN Charter [1] - The current global landscape is characterized by turmoil and transformation, indicating that the pursuit of peace and development remains a significant challenge [1] Group 2: Call to Action - The international community is urged to use the 80th anniversary of the UN as an opportunity to reaffirm its commitment to multilateralism and the collective ideal of maintaining world peace [1] - Fu Cong stressed the importance of peaceful dispute resolution, advocating for respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity among countries [1] Group 3: Recommendations for Major Powers - Major powers are encouraged to facilitate dialogue and cooperation rather than exacerbate tensions or promote confrontation [1] - The emphasis is placed on mutual understanding and compromise to resolve differences and build consensus through dialogue [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities marks the largest Western military action against Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, leading to global anticipation of Iran's response [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Statements - The U.S. government urged Iran to exercise restraint following the airstrikes, which were described by President Trump as a "stunning military success" [4][10]. - Trump warned Iran against retaliation, stating that any further actions would lead to more severe consequences [5][10]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio called on China to persuade Iran not to close the Strait of Hormuz, emphasizing the economic repercussions of such a move [9][10]. Group 2: Iran's Response and Threats - Iran's Foreign Minister stated that the country would consider all possible responses and would not return to negotiations before taking action [1][4]. - Iranian hardliners have called for missile strikes against the U.S. and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which is crucial for global oil transport [2][4]. - The Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz as a potential response to the U.S. airstrikes [5][6]. Group 3: Economic Implications - Approximately 20% of global oil consumption, or 20 million barrels per day, passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making its closure a significant threat to the oil market [6][8]. - Analysts predict that if the Strait is closed, oil prices could surge above $100 per barrel, impacting global economies, particularly in Asia and Europe [6][8][9]. - The potential closure of the Strait poses a risk of inflation and could disrupt the economic agenda of the Trump administration [2][6]. Group 4: International Reactions - The U.N. Security Council witnessed strong condemnation of the U.S. airstrikes from countries like Russia and China, highlighting concerns over violations of international law [11][13]. - The airstrikes have sparked protests in the U.S., with demonstrators opposing military intervention in Iran [15][16]. - The situation has raised fears of escalating conflict in the region, with warnings of potential retaliatory actions from Iran [1][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the joint resolution proposal by China, Russia, and Pakistan regarding the situation in Iran, emphasizing the need for immediate ceasefire and dialogue to maintain international peace and security [1]. Group 1 - The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities is described as a serious violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter, exacerbating tensions in the Middle East [1]. - The resolution draft calls for an unconditional ceasefire, protection of civilians, adherence to international law, and the initiation of dialogue and negotiations [1]. - The spokesperson expresses hope for support from UN Security Council members for the resolution to effectively contribute to maintaining international peace and security [1].

Group 1 - The article discusses the potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, which is a significant international trade and energy route, emphasizing the need for international efforts to de-escalate the conflict and maintain regional stability [2][3]. - The Chinese government condemns the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it violates the principles of the UN Charter and exacerbates tensions in the Middle East, calling for immediate ceasefire and dialogue [4]. - China maintains communication with Iran regarding the current situation, with recent discussions between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian aimed at promoting de-escalation [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the UN, Fu Cong, strongly condemned the US attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, emphasizing that such actions violate international law and exacerbate tensions in the Middle East [1][2]. Group 1: US Actions and International Response - The US has conducted strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, which Fu Cong stated severely violates the UN Charter and international law, infringing on Iran's sovereignty and security [1]. - Fu Cong expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions in the Middle East and called for an immediate ceasefire from conflict parties, particularly Israel, to prevent further escalation and avoid civilian casualties [1][2]. Group 2: Diplomatic Solutions and UN Role - Fu Cong asserted that military force cannot achieve peace in the Middle East, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the fundamental solution to the Iranian nuclear issue [2]. - A draft resolution has been proposed by Russia, China, and Pakistan in the UN Security Council, calling for an unconditional ceasefire, protection of civilians, adherence to international law, and the initiation of dialogue [2]. Group 3: China's Commitment - China expressed its willingness to work with the international community to restore peace and stability in the Middle East through continuous efforts [3].

Core Points - The international community condemned the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it violates the UN Charter and international law, posing a threat to peace and security in the Middle East [1][2][3] - Various countries and organizations called for restraint and emphasized the need for dialogue and diplomatic solutions to resolve the conflict [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Reactions from International Organizations - The UN Secretary-General urged member states to de-escalate tensions and fulfill their obligations under international law [1] - The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) expressed concern that U.S. actions would exacerbate regional tensions and called for diplomatic solutions [1] - The Arab League condemned any military actions that violate national sovereignty and warned against a cycle of violence [1] Group 2: Statements from Individual Countries - Egypt reiterated its opposition to actions violating international law, emphasizing that military solutions are not viable [2] - Russia strongly condemned the U.S. strikes, highlighting the violation of international law and UN resolutions [2] - India called for immediate de-escalation and restoration of peace through dialogue [2] Group 3: Regional Concerns - Lebanon warned that the U.S. strikes could escalate conflicts between Israel and Iran [2] - Qatar expressed concerns about the potential catastrophic consequences of the current tensions [3] - Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iranian sovereignty and called for political solutions [3] Group 4: Broader International Responses - Cuba condemned the U.S. actions as a serious violation of international law, warning of irreversible crises in the Middle East [4] - Colombia urged all parties to return to negotiations to prevent regional conflict escalation [4] - Switzerland emphasized the importance of respecting international law and called for maximum restraint [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the urgent need for a ceasefire in the Middle East, as highlighted by the draft resolution initiated by China, Russia, and Pakistan in the UN Security Council [1] - The draft resolution stresses the threat posed by attacks on nuclear facilities to international peace and security [1] - Currently, there is no scheduled voting time for the draft resolution within the UN Security Council [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military has successfully targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, leading to widespread international condemnation and concerns over escalating conflict in the Middle East [1][2]. Group 1: International Reactions - The United Nations Secretary-General expressed shock at the U.S. military action, warning that it poses a direct threat to international peace and security, and could lead to catastrophic consequences for civilians and the region [1]. - Chile's President condemned the U.S. strikes as a violation of international law, emphasizing the importance of adhering to humanitarian principles [1]. - Colombia's Foreign Ministry expressed deep concern over the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, urging all parties to return to negotiations to prevent regional conflict [1]. Group 2: Statements from Cuba - Cuba's President strongly condemned the U.S. actions, stating they violate the UN Charter and international law, potentially dragging humanity into an irreversible crisis [2]. - The Cuban Foreign Minister labeled the U.S. actions as direct aggression against Iran, describing them as a criminal and irresponsible act that could have unpredictable severe consequences [2]. - Cuba expressed solidarity with the Iranian government and people, criticizing the attack as a threat to international nuclear safety and the standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2].