版权声明 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪18日在第80届联合国大会全体会议审议安理会改革问题时表示，日本首相高市 早苗近期在国会发表的涉台言论极其错误，极为危险，粗暴干涉中国内政，严重违背一个中国原则和中日 四个政治文件精神。这是对国际正义的挑衅，对战后国际秩序的破坏，对国际关系基本准则的践踏，公然 背离了日本所作的走和平道路的基本承诺。这样的国家根本没有资格要求成为安理会常任理事国。 傅聪表示，今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，也是台湾光复80周年。日本在二 战期间发动侵略战争，包括对台湾实施殖民统治，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，给中国和亚洲受害国人民带来深 重灾难。然而时至今日，日本国内仍有势力不断宣扬错误的二战史观，参拜供奉二战甲级战犯的靖国神 社、修改中小学历史教科书、否认南京大屠杀和强征"慰安妇"等罪恶史实，宣扬所谓"终战"而非战败等历 史修正主义言论，妄图歪曲、否认、美化侵略历史和殖民统治。 傅聪强调，众所周知，世界上只有一个中国，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾是 中国领土不可分割的一部分。 针对日方的荒谬言论，傅聪在第二轮发言中指出，第二次世界大战胜利已经80年，二战事实 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, stated that Japan has no qualifications to demand a permanent seat on the UN Security Council [1] Group 1 - Fu Cong criticized Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan as extremely erroneous and dangerous, asserting that they grossly interfere in China's internal affairs [1] - He emphasized that Japan's actions violate the principles of one China and the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan [1] - Fu Cong described Japan's stance as a provocation against international justice and a disruption of the post-war international order, undermining fundamental principles of international relations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the United Nations emphasized the importance of intergovernmental negotiations as the only authorized platform for discussing Security Council reforms, highlighting its role in building consensus among member states [1] Group 1 - Intergovernmental negotiations have played an irreplaceable role in promoting consensus and reducing differences among member states over the years [1] - A few countries are openly challenging the authority of intergovernmental negotiations for their own political needs, which undermines the consensus of member states [1] - The Chinese government firmly opposes any attempts to force member states to take sides or abandon in-depth discussions on Security Council reforms [1]

中国常驻联合国代表傅聪18日在第80届联合国大会全体会议审议安理会改革问题时表示，日本 根本没有资格要求成为安理会常任理事国。 傅聪说，日本首相高市早苗的涉台言论极其错误，极为危险，粗暴干涉中国内政，严重违背一 个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神。这是对国际正义的挑衅，对战后国际秩序的破坏，对国 际关系基本准则的践踏，公然违背了日本所作的走和平道路的基本承诺。这样的国家根本没有 资格要求成为安理会常任理事国。 来源丨新华社 编辑丨刘雪莹 SFC ...

Core Viewpoint - China's permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, stated that Japan has no qualifications to demand a permanent seat on the UN Security Council [1] Group 1: Japan's Position - Fu Cong criticized Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan as extremely erroneous and dangerous, asserting that they grossly interfere in China's internal affairs [1] - He emphasized that such actions violate the principles of one China and the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan [1] Group 2: International Relations - The comments made by Japan are viewed as a provocation against international justice and a disruption of the post-war international order [1] - Fu Cong highlighted that Japan's stance undermines the basic principles of international relations and blatantly contradicts its commitment to a peaceful path [1]

Core Points - The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for countries to work together to create a Security Council that is "worthy of the hopes of all humanity" [1][2] - Guterres emphasized the need for reform in the Security Council, particularly in expanding its membership to enhance representation and stability in a multipolar world [1][2] Group 1 - The Security Council has been dedicated to achieving lasting peace for humanity since its establishment in 1946, and it has played a crucial role in preventing major wars between great powers [1] - Guterres pointed out the fragility of the Security Council's legitimacy, noting that member states often act contrary to the principles of the UN Charter, which undermines international action and the overall credibility of the UN [1] - He warned that ignoring rules could lead to disastrous outcomes, as history has shown [1] Group 2 - Guterres stated that the existence of the Security Council is not for "hegemony or empire," but rather for peace-making, highlighting the importance of a council that meets the needs of the times to avoid serious dangers [2] - On the same day, the 15 member states of the Security Council issued a presidential statement reaffirming their commitment to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, emphasizing that multilateralism and the rule of international law are fundamental to achieving lasting peace and shared prosperity [2]