国际学生招生
Search documents
美国高校国际新生锐减17%,96%院校表示签证顾虑是主因
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-11-18 05:41
Core Insights - The pipeline for global talent in the U.S. is in a precarious state, with a 17% decline in the number of new international students enrolling in U.S. colleges this fall due to tightened visa processes under the Trump administration [1][2] - A survey of over 825 U.S. higher education institutions revealed that 57% reported a decrease in international student enrollment for the 2025/2026 academic year, with 27% indicating a "significant" decline [1] - The International Education Association (NAFSA) estimates that excluding international students in Optional Practical Training (OPT), total international student enrollment will decrease by 7% in the 2025 academic year, leading to over $1.1 billion in revenue loss and nearly 2.3 million jobs lost [1] Reasons for Decline - Concerns regarding the visa application process, such as delays and rejections, have been identified as the primary reason for declining enrollment, with 96% of institutions citing this issue, up from 85% last year [2] - Students' feelings of unwelcomeness in the U.S. (67%) and concerns about the broader social and political environment (64%) are also impacting new enrollment numbers [2] - Controversial measures taken by the U.S. government, including restrictions on international students and changes to H1-B visa policies, contribute to uncertainty for international students wishing to work in the U.S. after graduation [2] Importance of OPT - 76% of U.S. institutions believe that OPT is crucial for attracting international students interested in work experience, and it provides economic benefits to U.S. businesses [3] - 92% of U.S. colleges reported that without OPT, international students are likely to choose other countries for their education [3] Key Markets - The U.S. remains the top destination for international students from over 200 countries, with India, China, and South Korea being the largest source countries [4] - For the 2024/2025 academic year, India accounts for over 30% of international students, while China represents 23% and South Korea slightly less than 4% [4] - Experts express concern about the implications of these trends for future enrollment, particularly for the 2026 and 2027 academic years [4]
特朗普签证新政后,美国大学海外新生大跌17%
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-11-18 01:13
Core Insights - The number of new international students enrolling in U.S. universities has dropped by 17%, marking one of the most significant declines on record, raising concerns about the long-term innovation capacity and economic growth prospects of the U.S. [1][2] - The decline is attributed primarily to the stringent policies of the Trump administration regarding higher education and immigration, with 57% of surveyed institutions reporting a decrease in international student enrollment [1][2][4]. Economic Impact - International students contribute approximately $44 billion to the U.S. economy, and the decline in new enrollments poses a direct threat to tuition revenue for universities [2][4]. - The uncertainty surrounding visa policies is a major factor in the decline, with 96% of institutions citing visa application issues as a primary reason for reduced enrollment [2][3]. Policy and Regulatory Challenges - The Trump administration's legal actions against universities and threats to limit federal funding have created an environment of uncertainty for international students [2][3]. - Proposed regulations, including a cap on international students at 15% of total enrollment, further complicate the landscape for prospective students [3]. Talent and Innovation Concerns - The reduction in international students could weaken the U.S. innovation ecosystem, particularly in STEM fields, where international talent has historically been a driving force [4]. - The loss of confidence among international students may lead them to pursue education in other countries, posing a long-term challenge to the U.S. as a destination for top talent [4]. Institutional Responses - Some U.S. universities are adjusting their recruitment strategies, focusing more on domestic students in response to the changing environment [6]. - The demographic composition of international students is shifting, with India and China remaining the largest sources, while Ghana shows significant growth in student numbers [6].
有反转?美国教育部长称可能恢复对哈佛大学拨款,只要……
第一财经· 2025-06-11 12:12
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University regarding federal funding, highlighting the potential restoration of funding if universities comply with government expectations [1][4]. Group 1: Federal Funding and Legal Disputes - The Trump administration has threatened to cut Harvard's federal funding, amounting to $2.2 billion, due to the university's refusal to comply with certain policy changes [4]. - Harvard has filed lawsuits against the Trump administration to challenge the freezing of federal funds and the revocation of its international student admission license [5]. - The U.S. Education Secretary indicated that if universities like Harvard change their policies, the previously cut federal funds could be restored [4][6]. Group 2: Impact on Higher Education - The funding cuts have significant implications for research projects at Harvard, potentially leading to job losses and project cancellations [6]. - Other universities, including Columbia University, have also faced funding cuts, resulting in layoffs and threats to their accreditation status [8]. - The article emphasizes that international students are crucial for U.S. higher education, contributing to both academic diversity and financial resources [9]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The Trump administration's actions are seen as an attempt to reshape the academic landscape in the U.S., particularly targeting elite institutions [8]. - The potential loss of international students poses a threat to the talent pool and competitive edge of U.S. higher education globally [9]. - Concerns are raised about the interference in university governance and academic freedom due to the administration's demands [9].