综合来看，《报告》显示，上海、北京、深圳为第一梯队，每个城市的总积分超过2400；杭州、广州、苏州、成都、 南京、武汉、长沙为第二梯队，每个城市的总积分介于2000到2400之间；青岛、重庆、无锡、天津、合肥、宁波、郑 州、济南、西安、厦门、福州、常州、昆明、沈阳、东莞、佛山、南通17个城市为第三梯队，每个城市的总积分介于 1500到2000之间。积分越高，表示该城市在各维度的综合能力越强。 | | | | | 经济 | 科技 | 消费 | 数智 | 开放 | 区域 | 城市 | 绿色 | 市场 | 文化 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 排序 | 城市 | | | | | | | | | | | | | 总积分 | | | | | 实力 | | 创新 | 活力 | 赋能 | 发展 | 联动 | 韧性 | 低碳 | 环境 | 生活 | | | 1 | E | 海 | 271 | | 284 | 206 | 275 | 279 | 298 | 209 ...

21世纪经济报道记者李莎 北京报道 日前，瞭望智库与普华永道在北京联合举办《机遇之城2025》报告（以下简称《报告》）发 布会暨"从机遇之城看中国机遇"研讨会。 《报告》以新质生产力发展催生的新优势、新动能为核心，以60个城市为样本，构建10个维度和50个变量的综合评估体系。 《报告》中的60个城市占全国GDP总额比重56%，占全国技术合同成交额的72%，占全国金融机构存款余额的64%，占全国社会 消费品零售总额的56%，样本选择具有广泛代表性和较大影响力。 综合来看，《报告》显示，上海、北京、深圳为第一梯队，每个城市的总积分超过2400；杭州、广州、苏州、成都、南京、武 汉、长沙为第二梯队，每个城市的总积分介于2000到2400之间；青岛、重庆、无锡、天津、合肥、宁波、郑州、济南、西安、 厦门、福州、常州、昆明、沈阳、东莞、佛山、南通17个城市为第三梯队，每个城市的总积分介于1500到2000之间。积分越 高，表示该城市在各维度的综合能力越强。 | | | 经济 | 科技 | 消费 | 数智 | 开放 | 区域 | 城市 | 绿色 | 市场 | 文化 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent Central Urban Work Conference marks a significant shift in urban development strategy, moving from aggressive expansion to a focus on improving living conditions for residents [1][3][11] Group 1: Shift in Urban Development Strategy - The previous approach to urban development was characterized by rapid expansion and high property prices, leading to issues such as ghost towns and financial strain on residents [3][4] - The new directive emphasizes the importance of maintaining existing infrastructure and improving the quality of life for citizens, rather than merely increasing land sales and construction [3][4][5] - Key initiatives include repurposing unused industrial spaces for community services and upgrading aging infrastructure, which directly addresses residents' daily concerns [3][4][5] Group 2: Decentralization of Opportunities - The conference encourages the development of smaller cities and counties, promoting local opportunities rather than concentrating resources in major cities like Beijing and Shanghai [5][6] - This shift is driven by changing demographics, with more individuals preferring to stay in smaller cities where living conditions are improving and job opportunities are emerging [5][6] - The focus on local industries and unique regional characteristics aims to create sustainable economic growth in various areas, reducing the pressure on major urban centers [5][6] Group 3: Redefining Urban Competition - Future urban competition will prioritize "soft power" over traditional metrics like GDP growth, focusing on residents' quality of life and satisfaction [7][8] - Factors such as ease of finding jobs, healthcare accessibility, and overall living conditions will become the new benchmarks for evaluating urban success [7][8] - The emphasis on community satisfaction reflects a broader understanding that urban development should serve the needs of the people rather than just economic indicators [7][8] Group 4: Long-term Vision for Urban Living - The ultimate goal of urban development is to create comfortable living environments where residents feel secure and satisfied with their daily lives [9][10][11] - The conference's outcomes suggest a future where urban areas are designed to enhance the quality of life, with improved public services and infrastructure [9][10][11] - The narrative shifts from viewing cities as mere economic engines to recognizing them as homes that prioritize the well-being of their inhabitants [9][10][11]