Group 1 - The return on effort is decreasing over the years, leading to a sense of futility among individuals striving for success [2][19][44] - The shift from an "opening up" era to a "ranking" era has made it difficult for individuals to achieve upward mobility, as opportunities are increasingly limited [3][12][18] - The influence of lineage and social structures is becoming more pronounced, making it harder for individuals from less privileged backgrounds to succeed [4][27][39] Group 2 - Companies often prioritize organizational goals over individual aspirations, leading to a culture that stifles innovation and personal growth [7][10][11] - The overemphasis on performance metrics and short-term goals can hinder employees' long-term vision and cross-disciplinary thinking [8][9] - The rise of outsourcing has created a workforce that lacks a sense of belonging and clear career advancement paths, further complicating job security [13][15][16] Group 3 - The stagnation of technological advancement and the oversupply of certain job roles, such as programmers, contribute to the devaluation of effort in the job market [17][21] - The perception that education can change one's fate is diminishing as higher education becomes more accessible and societal structures become more rigid [19][20][22] - The current job market reflects a cycle where individuals feel increasingly like cogs in a machine, losing their drive and ambition [9][23][24] Group 4 - The dynamics of wealth distribution and business opportunities suggest that entrepreneurship remains a viable path for upward mobility, despite the challenges [29][30][38] - The future may favor those who can adapt to new technologies, such as AI, which can create opportunities for individuals with unique skills [30][31][45] - The social landscape is characterized by a duality where both inherited advantages and grassroots efforts coexist, leading to a complex societal structure [36][37][38]