Group 1 - The article discusses Trump's unique approach to U.S.-China strategic competition, contrasting it with the bipartisan consensus in Washington that views this rivalry as crucial for national interests [1][3] - Trump's focus is more on trade negotiations rather than viewing China as a comprehensive strategic adversary, emphasizing practical outcomes like increasing purchases of U.S. agricultural products [3][8] - There has been a noticeable shift in Trump's attitude towards China during his presidency, with a significant change in his administration's personnel towards more pragmatic figures [3][8] Group 2 - The core demand of Trump's administration is a tangible trade surplus rather than abstract strategic advantages, as evidenced by the shift in focus from geopolitical strategy to domestic political struggles [8][10] - The Pentagon's latest strategic report reflects this change, moving from a focus on containing China to prioritizing the defense of the Americas, which has raised concerns among bipartisan lawmakers [8][10] - The article highlights a historical turning point where the U.S. is retracting its global presence, allowing China to propose new global governance initiatives, marking a significant shift in international relations [10]