Workflow
大陆封锁政策
icon
Search documents
30天内,5国领导人相继访华,美国见状迅速宣布,又有20国加群
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-30 03:54
2026年刚过一个月,五国领导人陆续访华,释放出了强烈的信号。而与此同时,美国却迅速宣布好消息,宣称已有20个国家加入了他们所谓的新群,试图借 此展现他们的领导力。对于这一系列的变动,如何看待? 1月28日,英国首相时隔八年再次访华。在短短不到30天的时间里,已经有韩国、爱尔兰、加拿大、芬兰和英国这五国的领导人来到了中国,所谓的访华热 潮再度席卷而来。值得注意的是,其中有两个国家是美国的核心盟友。尤其是在去年中国首次实现超过1万亿美元的贸易顺差之后,这意味着美国的贸易战 和关税战实际上已经宣告失败。而如今,多国领导人的访华,再加上其中不少来自美国的核心盟友,无疑传递出一个信息:近些年美国的围堵中国策略,显 然走到了死胡同。 有人分析指出,美国在围堵中国上看似取得了一些短期的成功。的确,G7集团在多个问题上步调一致,集体施压中国,同时韩国、菲律宾等中国周边国家 也纷纷倒向美国。然而,时至今日,这些曾经在美国阵营中坚定站队的国家却又重新开始与中国展开紧密的互动和合作。对于这种变化,有人将责任归咎于 特朗普。但从根本上讲,围堵中国的策略从一开始就注定无法成功。美国的做法,实际上是在模仿拿破仑时代的大陆封锁政策,试图 ...
贸易战会如何收场?
集思录· 2025-04-09 14:17
Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing trade war between China and the US, suggesting that both sides are preparing for a prolonged conflict, with neither willing to back down in the short term [1][4]. - It highlights the potential for a temporary peak in tensions, followed by a return to negotiations where both parties may agree to reduce tariffs, with China possibly making larger concessions [1][3]. - The article emphasizes the internal factors that will determine the outcome of the trade war, such as the need for China to reform and open more sectors to private enterprises, and the importance of increasing labor income [2][3]. Group 2 - The article points out that the trade war may lead to different economic challenges for China and the US, with China facing overcapacity and potential deflation, while the US may struggle with undercapacity and inflation [5][11]. - It mentions that China's average working hours are strictly regulated, which could help reduce overcapacity by limiting production [5]. - The article also notes that the US economy may undergo significant restructuring in the long term, with a potential decline in the dollar's dominance and a shift towards a multipolar world [3][12]. Group 3 - The article draws historical parallels, referencing Napoleon's continental blockade as a cautionary tale about the consequences of economic isolationism [9][10]. - It suggests that while a complete breakdown in trade between China and the US could occur, both countries would still find alternative trading partners, similar to Russia's situation with Europe [11][12]. - The article concludes that the trade war could lead to increased domestic pressures for reform within China, as external challenges often prompt internal changes [8].