Group 1 - The core argument presented is that individual paths to success should be respected and not generalized based on the achievements of a few notable figures, such as Wang Xingxing, who succeeded without a doctoral degree [1][3][5] - Wang Xingxing's success is attributed to his departure from traditional educational paths and his engagement in practical technological advancements, particularly in the field of humanoid robotics, which challenges conventional views on the necessity of a PhD [3][5] - The discussion emphasizes that success should not be equated with the correctness of the path taken, and that individual capabilities and environmental factors play a crucial role in achieving success [5][7] Group 2 - The debate around education and talent cultivation should adopt a more rational and dialectical approach, recognizing that while academic qualifications are not the sole determinants of innovation, success should not be simplistically viewed as a validation of any path taken [7] - The narrative surrounding successful entrepreneurs like Jack Ma and Cao Dewang should not reduce their achievements to a mere dismissal of educational value, as their success is rooted in strategic vision, social insight, and execution capabilities [5][7] - The focus should shift towards how education can help individuals discover their unique potential rather than adhering to a singular path to success, highlighting the importance of being in the right place at the right time [7]