《中国民航报》、中国民航网 记者胡夕姮 通讯员孙本芳 报道：根据民航工会的部署要求，7月16日下 午，华东民航"为安全筑基 为发展赋能"优秀班组长安全文化宣讲活动在青岛机场集团综合服务中心举 行。华东民航辖区各单位工会主席、工会办主任、优秀班组长代表、职工代表等共240余人现场参加活 动。活动通过民航工会官方视频号进行线上同步直播。 （本文图片均由民航华东局提供） 民航华东地区管理局副局长、工会主席西绍波在致辞中强调安全对民航业的基石作用，希望广大职工将 宣讲活动学习所获转化为推进华东民航高质量发展的生动实践；同时要求华东民航各级工会组织强化职 工思想政治引领，竭诚服务职工，不断激发职工创新创造活力，持续筑牢班组安全建设根基。 随后，来自华东民航安全生产运行一线的13名优秀班组代表登台宣讲。他们来自飞行、乘务、机务、空 保、安检、运行控制、机电维护、地勤保障、鸟防管理、空中交通管制等多个岗位。他们从安全理念、 制度建设、风险防控、案例分析、团队合作、应急处置、文化聚力、智慧创新、安全监管、工匠文化精 神建设等方面，声情并茂地分享了华东民航基层一线班组在贯彻落实民航局安全工作部署、保障安全生 产运行方面的经验做 ...

《金融时报》记者注意到，2022年，一起关于"工行2.5亿存款'不翼而飞'"的案件引起了社会 广泛关注。 据悉，2018年9月至2019年5月，工商银行南宁分行工作人员梁建红以"为贷款企业做存款贡 献"为由，通过3名中间人招揽有闲置资金的客户到该行办理大额存款业务，并承诺除正常银 行大额存款利息外，额外支付给中间人每月4.5%左右的收益。为顺利窃取储户存单款，梁建 红还指使下属时某伪造存单等银行票证，趁储户不备替换真实存单。 据统计，梁建红共计窃取28名被害人约2.53亿元存款，除去已返还部分款项，案发后仍有约 1.2亿元未归还。 2021年11月19日，南宁中院作出一审判决：梁建红因犯盗窃罪、诈骗罪、伪造金融票证罪 等，被判处无期徒刑；时某及另两名案犯分别获7至15年不等有期徒刑；责令各被告人退赔各 被害人的经济损失。 对于工行在这次案件中的责任，判决书中表示，"梁建红原所属单位是否是退赔责任主体并不 在本案审理范围之内，本院不予评判。" 7月15日上午，曾备受关注的工行"2.5亿元存款'不翼而飞'"一案迎来新进展，双方当事人在 南宁市青秀区人民法院进行证据交换。 北京安剑律师事务所律师周兆成，作为原告储户 ...

Core Points - The investigation report on the "4·23" fire accident at the Chaobai River Bridge in Beijing was released, holding two units and 16 individuals accountable [1] - The fire occurred on April 23, 2025, leading to the collapse of the main bridge span, with direct economic losses amounting to 16.298 million yuan [1] - The accident was attributed to improper management of road lighting facility construction and maintenance, as well as inadequate oversight by relevant government departments [2] Investigation Findings - The direct cause of the accident was identified as corrosion and perforation of the steel pipe protecting the road lighting cable, leading to electrical short circuits and subsequent ignition of combustible materials [2] - The fire spread through the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheath, causing multiple steel wires and strands to fail under high temperatures, resulting in the collapse of the bridge span [2] - The investigation revealed significant issues in construction management, daily maintenance of lighting facilities, and emergency response preparedness [2] Accountability Measures - The investigation team referred issues related to public officials' responsibilities to the Beijing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Supervisory Commission for further accountability [2] - Following the investigation, disciplinary actions were taken against two units and 16 responsible individuals [2]

Core Points - The investigation report revealed that a general object strike accident occurred during the installation of a bus station in Guangming District, Shenzhen, resulting in one death and direct economic losses of approximately 2.6 million RMB [1][3] - The accident was attributed to the failure of the supplier to fulfill safety management responsibilities and workers' violation of operational regulations [1][5] Incident Overview - The accident occurred on April 14, 2024, when workers were unloading large glass panels from a delivery vehicle, which was improperly positioned, leading to the glass panels tipping over and causing a fatality [2][3] - The glass panels measured 1810mm in width, 3800mm in length, and weighed 150kg, with the victim being unable to escape in time [3] Responsibility Assessment - The investigation identified two main causes: unsafe human behavior and unsafe conditions of the materials involved [5] - The main contractor, Guangdong Aizhuo Precision Manufacturing Co., failed to implement adequate safety measures, leading to the accident [5][6] - Recommendations for administrative penalties were made against the responsible parties, including the main responsible person of Guangdong Aizhuo and the company itself for not fulfilling safety responsibilities [6]

Core Points - The Ministry of Education has issued a new notification emphasizing the importance of reducing student burdens, with a focus on three main changes: prioritizing "burden reduction," de-emphasizing enrollment rates, and upgrading campus safety responsibilities [1][3][9] Group 1: Changes in Education Policy - The position of "burden reduction" clauses has been moved up in the list of regulations, indicating a greater emphasis from the government on this issue [3][4] - New regulations include a ban on frequent examinations, limiting middle school exams to once a month and prohibiting written exams for first and second graders [7][11] - The focus on enrollment rates as a key performance indicator for schools and teachers has been removed, promoting a holistic development approach for students [9][11] Group 2: Campus Safety and Accountability - The responsibility for campus safety has shifted from individual teachers to the school administration, making principals and management accountable for incidents such as bullying [15][17] - Schools are now required to actively prevent bullying and ensure a safe environment for students [17] Group 3: Challenges in Implementation - Despite the comprehensive nature of the new regulations, there are concerns regarding their effective implementation, as previous efforts to reduce student burdens have not yielded significant results [18][20] - The existing education system, which heavily relies on examination results, continues to exert pressure on students, making it difficult to achieve the intended reductions in workload [20][22] - Societal attitudes towards education and competition may hinder the acceptance of these new policies, as parents fear that reducing burdens could negatively impact their children's academic performance [24][26]

央视新闻6月15日消息，2024年10月12日13时30分许，山东省潍坊市寿光市潍坊金石生物科技有限公司发生中 毒事故，共造成7人死亡、4人受伤。 山东省应急管理厅官网近日公布调查报告， 经调查认定，该事故是一起因企业未落实有限空间作业风险管控 措施，违章指挥、违规作业和盲目施救，地方党委、政府及其有关部门和单位履职不到位而导致的较大生产安 全责任事故。 报告显示， 金石公司实际控制人等5人已被司法机关采取强制措施，寿光市羊口镇党委委员、副镇长等21人被 建议给予党纪政务处分和组织处理。 造成事故的直接原因是： 1.硫化氢产生并积聚。事发3号浆池两层覆膜编织布之间残存的玉米浆液混入了地下水等其他物质，玉米浆液 中的蛋白质和亚硫酸盐长期在厌氧条件下存放，腐败发酵产生并在夹层鼓包内积聚了大量硫化氢气体。 2.作业人员违规作业以及救援人员盲目施救。现场作业人员在未进行通风、检测，未佩戴安全防护装备的情况 下，违规进入浆池底部开展抽浆作业，作业过程中硫化氢有毒有害气体逸出并扩散，作业人员吸入后中毒晕 倒。救援人员未采取有效安全防护措施盲目施救时相继中毒，造成伤亡人数扩大。 （二）已被司法机关采取强制措施人员（5人） ...

Core Points - The incident occurred on February 28, 2025, at a pig farm in Shuanghe Town, Heshan City, Guangdong, resulting in 2 deaths and 1 injury, with direct economic losses estimated at approximately 2.006 million yuan [1][5] - The investigation report identified the incident as a production safety responsibility accident caused by illegal operations and blind rescue attempts, which exacerbated the casualties [1][8] Incident Details - The workers from Jiangmen Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. were performing limited space operations related to the installation of a sewage pump in a biogas tank when the accident occurred [5] - One worker lost consciousness due to inhaling toxic gases and fell into the tank, prompting another worker to attempt a rescue without proper safety measures, leading to further casualties [7] Direct Causes - The direct causes of the accident included: 1. Violation of safety regulations for limited space operations, including lack of preparation in terms of material reserves, personnel training, and safety measures [8] 2. Blind rescue attempts without ensuring safety or using necessary protective equipment, which led to increased casualties [8]

擅自打开飞机应急舱门，可能承担何种法律责任？ 汪洪涛介绍，根据《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》第三十四条第一款规定，盗窃、损坏、擅自移动 使用中的航空设施，或者强行进入航空器驾驶舱的，处十日以上十五日以下拘留。考虑该乘客是在飞机 停稳后打开的应急舱门，未导致严重后果，因此该男子被处以行政拘留。"当飞机在飞行等特定阶段， 或者因为擅自打开应急舱门出现严重后果，肇事者还可能因以危险方法危害公共安全被判处刑罚。"汪 洪涛表示。 应急舱门打开后，需要进行维修复位，会产生相关费用，还可能导致航班延误、飞机维修停飞、航班应 急滑梯弹出复位等，从而给航空公司、机场及其他乘客带来经济损失。"航空公司在定损后，可以追究 乘客的民事责任，要求肇事者赔偿相关损失。"汪洪涛说。 (责编：胡永秋、杨光宇) 5月11日，一架从长沙飞至昆明的航班在抵达昆明长水机场后，一名在应急过道就座的25岁男子，擅自 打开应急舱门，导致机上乘客滞留20多分钟后才安全走出飞机。云南省公安厅民用机场公安局昆明长水 机场航站区派出所依据治安管理处罚法相关规定，对该男子处以行政拘留13日的行政处罚。 为了确保应急舱门在特殊情况下能够被妥当使用，航空公司通常在乘 ...

Core Points - The incident on December 22, 2024, involved a crane accident during the construction of the Shanghai Hujia Expressway-Jiamin Elevated Connection Line, resulting in damage to a train on Line 11 of the Shanghai Metro [1][3] - The direct economic loss from the accident is approximately 18.31 million yuan [1] - The accident was classified as a major safety responsibility incident due to violations of construction plans and operational procedures [3] Incident Details - The accident occurred at around 7:30 AM when the Shanghai Greenland Steel Structure Co., Ltd. was conducting a box beam hoisting operation [4] - At 7:55 AM, a 260-ton crawler crane tipped over towards the metro line, leading to a collision with a train traveling at 91.2 km/h [4][5] - The train's emergency braking system was activated, and it came to a stop 19 seconds after the collision [5] Causes of the Accident - The accident was primarily caused by discrepancies in crane selection and positioning, leading to a lack of coordination during the dual crane operation [6] - The 260-ton crane was overloaded and exceeded the allowable horizontal level, resulting in excessive lateral forces that caused the crane's arm to collapse [6] - Specific issues included the use of an incorrect crane model, lack of synchronization between the two cranes, and failure to adhere to safety protocols [6] Identified Problems - The subcontractor failed to implement a comprehensive safety responsibility system, and the project manager was often absent [7] - There were violations of operational procedures, including improper crane positioning and lack of supervision during the hoisting operation [7] - The main contractor did not ensure proper safety management and failed to notify the metro company about the construction activities [8] Recommendations for Accountability - Criminal liability is suggested for several individuals involved, including the crane operator and project technical leader [9] - Administrative penalties are recommended for the subcontractor, crane rental company, and main contractor, as well as their respective leaders [10]