（来源：中国妇女报） 转自：中国妇女报 □ 中国妇女报全媒体记者 王春霞 今年是反家庭暴力法实施十周年。婚姻家庭纠纷、未成年人权益保障问题也备受社会关注。围绕妇女儿 童权益方面的热点问题，日前，中国妇女报全媒体记者专访了最高人民法院民一庭庭长陈宜芳。 精神类家庭暴力得到更多关注 记者：司法审判实践中，家庭暴力呈现哪些特点？人民法院在反家暴方面开展了哪些工作，面临哪些难 点，下一步将如何推进解决？ 陈宜芳：从司法审判实践看，家庭暴力主要具有以下特点：一是具有隐蔽性。家庭暴力发生在家庭成员 之间，且行为具有突发性、场所具有隐蔽性，第三方难以即时发现，部分受害人因缺乏法律意识，未能 保留相应证据，导致诉讼中举证难。二是家暴类型呈多样化。近年来，人民法院受理的申请人身安全保 护令等案件中，受害人主张加害人长期以谩骂、恐吓、自伤自残等方式使其身心自由受限的精神类家庭 暴力逐渐增多。三是涉家暴主体范围扩大。向人民法院申请人身安全保护令的主体，除家庭成员外，还 包括恋爱中以及离婚之后或终止恋爱关系的当事人。 最高人民法院坚决反对一切形式的家庭暴力，指导各级法院采取一系列举措，打击家庭暴力行为。一是 贯彻落实人身安全保护令制 ...

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of Article 1088 of the Civil Code in China allows one spouse to request compensation for household labor during divorce, leading to a growing recognition of the economic value of domestic work [1][2][3] Group 1: Legal Framework and Case Studies - The "household labor compensation clause" was enacted in 2021, allowing for compensation claims during divorce proceedings [1] - A study by Chen Xuezheng found that out of 241 cases analyzed, courts supported compensation requests in 45% of instances [1][2] - The first case in Shandong highlighted the lack of awareness about this legal provision among many individuals, particularly those without legal representation [2] Group 2: Challenges in Proving Household Labor - Proving the extent of household labor and determining compensation amounts are significant legal challenges [3][4] - Many cases involve dual-income households where responsibilities are not clearly defined, complicating the determination of who bears more household duties [3][4] - The recognition of household contributions by the other party is crucial for successful claims, as seen in Ma Xiaoli's case where the husband acknowledged her contributions [5][6] Group 3: Compensation Determination - Compensation amounts vary widely, with cases ranging from 3,000 to 300,000 yuan, but most fall between 10,000 and 50,000 yuan [8][9] - Judges consider various factors, including the duration of marriage, the economic situation of both parties, and the nature of household contributions when determining compensation [7][8][12] - The lack of a standardized formula for calculating compensation leads to subjective judgments by judges, reflecting the unique circumstances of each case [8][10][12] Group 4: Future Considerations - The upcoming legal interpretations set to take effect in 2025 aim to provide clearer guidelines for determining compensation amounts, considering factors like time, effort, and local income levels [12] - There is a call for a more unified approach to reduce disputes over compensation amounts and to maintain family harmony [12][13]