Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court of China has issued an interpretation regarding the legal application of government information disclosure lawsuits, emphasizing that these lawsuits are classified as "payment lawsuits" requiring substantial responses from administrative agencies [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework - The interpretation clarifies that government information is categorized as public and must be disclosed within 20 working days following a court ruling [1][2]. - The interpretation aims to address issues where administrative agencies fail to disclose information even after a favorable ruling for the plaintiff, leading to repeated lawsuits [1][2]. Group 2: Burden of Proof - The interpretation specifies that the burden of proof lies with the defendant (administrative agency) when refusing to disclose information based on commercial secrets or personal privacy [3]. - Defendants must provide justification for public interest reasons and demonstrate how non-disclosure could significantly impact public interest [3]. Group 3: Practical Implications - There are concerns regarding the misuse of information requests by citizens, which can waste judicial resources and disrupt administrative processes [3]. - The interpretation aims to streamline the process and reduce frivolous lawsuits by clarifying the responsibilities of both parties involved in information disclosure cases [3].

过去16年来给家里蒸的馒头、烙的饼，或许能换成钱。马小莉是在打离婚官司的法庭上明白这一点的。 自2021年《中华人民共和国民法典》正式施行，俗称"家务劳动补偿条款"的第1088条随之生效——夫妻 一方因抚育子女、照料老年人、协助另一方工作等负担较多义务的，离婚时有权向另一方请求补偿，另 一方应当给予补偿。 扬州大学法学研究生陈学珍在她2024年的论文中做了一项统计——将"家务劳动"设置为关键词，从"中 国裁判文书网"上筛选出241份样本案件，有8项法院全部支持补偿请求，101项部分支持，127项不支 持，5项未作出回应——总体上法院对家务劳动补偿的支持率为45%。 一些法院乐于对本院第一起家务劳动补偿案件进行宣传，却容易招致嘲讽与批评。有法院为全职妈妈10 年的家务付出作出补偿两万元的判决，网民们一算，发现每天不到6元。 "从法官的专业角度分析，也是不好取证的。"冶文贵说，除非是一方长期不在家住，排除其付出，接下 来的付出就是另一方的了。 陈学珍在她的研究中筛选了能够反映出家庭分工模式的155例案件，发现仅有约11%的家庭是一方外出 工作，一方全职照顾家务；大多数是双职工家庭，但一方在工作的同时还需承担更多家 ...