Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) employment data has faced increasing scrutiny for systematic overestimation, leading to significant downward revisions that impact market perceptions and monetary policy decisions [1][3][4]. Group 1: Employment Data Issues - The BLS employment data often appears strong upon initial release but is frequently revised downward in subsequent months, raising concerns about the accuracy of the reported figures [1][3]. - Statistical biases, such as the "birth-death adjustment" model, contribute to the overestimation of employment figures, as it assumes a consistent influx of new businesses that may not reflect reality [1][3]. - Alternative data sources like the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) and Business Employment Dynamics (BED) provide more reliable employment figures, indicating that BLS has overestimated job growth by approximately 800,000 positions in 2023 [1][3]. Group 2: Market and Monetary Policy Implications - A significant downward revision of 818,000 jobs in August 2024 marked the largest adjustment in nearly a decade, influencing Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's decision to cut interest rates by 50 basis points [3][4]. - The anticipated further downward revision of 550,000 jobs in September 2025 could lead to a more aggressive monetary policy response, potentially increasing the expected rate cut from 25 to 50 basis points [4][6]. - The ongoing adjustments to employment data highlight the need for the Federal Reserve to acknowledge economic slowdown, which may accelerate the pace of monetary easing [4][6]. Group 3: Political and Economic Context - The political implications of interest rate cuts are significant, especially in an election year, as they can temporarily boost stock markets and consumer confidence, benefiting the ruling party [6]. - The perception of the Federal Reserve's independence is challenged by the timing of monetary policy decisions in relation to employment data revisions, raising concerns about potential political influences [6]. - The persistent overestimation of employment data is not an isolated incident but reflects a structural bias in statistical methods, necessitating a more cautious approach from investors who should consider administrative data and market signals for economic assessments [6].

2025.08. 02 微信编辑 | 七三 第 一 财 经 持 续 追 踪 财 经 热 点 。 若 您 掌 握 公 司 动 态 、 行 业 趋 势 、 金 融 事 件 等 有 价 值 的 线 索 ， 欢 迎 提 供 。 专 用 邮 箱 ： bianjibu@yicai.com （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 推荐阅读 本文字数：365，阅读时长大约1分钟 据央视新闻，当地时间8月1日，美国总统特朗普总统在社交媒体"真实社交"发文， 指责劳工统计局 局长埃丽卡·麦肯塔弗在2024年美国大选前"人为夸大"就业数据，要求立即将其解职 ，并由"更有 能力的人选"接替。 特朗普称该局曾在2024年3月和大选前数月严重高估新增就业岗位，认为此举旨在助推副总统哈里 斯胜选。他同时批评美联储大选前下调利率"操控市场"，并暗示应撤换主席鲍威尔。 美国劳工部长洛丽·查韦斯-德雷默当天宣布，美国劳工统计局副局长威廉·威亚特罗夫斯基将出任代 理局长，接替埃丽卡·麦肯塔弗。 特朗普称已收到访华邀请，外交部回应 ...