2025.11. 25 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪大使在发言中表示，加沙第一阶段停火协议达成，但巴以和平还远未实现， 平民的苦难还在继续。加沙的暴力冲突仍在发生。据报道，以色列已经违反停火协议400多次，造成 300多名加沙民众死亡。 埃尔多安指出， 自加沙停火第一阶段协议生效以来，以色列在加沙地带杀害无辜平民，并持续在约 旦河西岸实施占领和军事打击行动。他 强调，土方坚决反对任何吞并约旦河西岸、改变耶路撒冷现 状，或损害阿克萨清真寺神圣性的企图。 "停火意味着停止一切袭击行为，应得到冲突方的善意遵守，任何导致平民伤亡的事件都不可接受。 频繁的袭击不能成为加沙的新常态。中方呼吁有关各方特别是以色列全面遵守停火协议要求，推动实 现真正的全面、持久停火。"傅聪强调。 傅聪大使强调四点：实现加沙持久停火是优先任务，扩大加沙人道救援是当务之急，缓解约旦河西岸 局势是紧迫要求，落实"两国方案"是唯一出路。 傅聪大使重申，中方一贯坚定支持巴勒斯坦人民恢复民族合法权利的正义事业，将继续致力于实现持 久停火、缓解人道局势，推动巴勒斯坦问题在联合国有关决议和"两国方案"基础上早日得到全面、 公正、持久解决。 加沙停火协议生效以来， ...

Core Viewpoint - A large-scale protest took place in Berlin against Israel's military actions in Gaza, with demonstrators demanding the German government to halt all military cooperation with Israel and ensure humanitarian aid reaches Gaza [1][6]. Group 1: Protest Details - Thousands of protesters gathered in Berlin, accusing the Israeli military of committing large-scale violence against civilians in Gaza [1]. - The protest was organized by the Palestinian community in Germany and the Left Party, highlighting the growing domestic and international pressure on the German government regarding the Israel-Palestine issue [6]. Group 2: Protester Statements - One protester emphasized the importance of political and social justice, identifying the Palestinian issue as a significant focus of injustice in the world today [3]. - Another protester, who traveled from Munich, stated that Germans must firmly oppose any form of genocide, reflecting on the historical context of Germany's past actions [4].

Group 1 - The U.S. veto of the UN Security Council resolution on Gaza indicates strong diplomatic support for Israel, likely leading to an escalation of military actions in Gaza City [1] - The veto may result in increased regional instability, as Israel's military actions could provoke further conflicts in the Middle East [2] - The U.S. veto contributes to a growing divide in the international community regarding the Israeli-Palestinian issue, with a split emerging between nations supporting Palestinian statehood and those aligned with Israel [3] Group 2 - The veto reflects a broader trend of U.S. unilateral actions that undermine the two-state solution and Palestinian aspirations for statehood [3] - The current geopolitical climate, characterized by a new Cold War and fragmentation, exacerbates the challenges of global governance and international cooperation [3]

9月17日，在北京香山论坛，新京报专访以色列前副外长约西.贝林，谈及巴以问题。贝林表示，巴勒斯 坦人也是人，从加沙驱逐任何人的想法都是残忍的且不现实的，毫无疑问，加沙未来是巴勒斯坦的一部 分。 ...

Core Points - The international conference to implement the "two-state solution" will reconvene on September 22, a day before the UN General Assembly's general debate, with participation from multiple heads of state [1] - The UN Security Council is currently negotiating a draft resolution addressing issues such as the famine in Gaza and Israel's construction of settlements in the "E1 area," with hopes for a vote next week [1] - If the draft resolution fails to pass in the Security Council, there will be a call for an emergency special session of the 10th UN General Assembly [1] - The 10th UN General Assembly emergency special session, which focuses on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, was first convened in April 1997 and has been suspended multiple times [1] - On June 12, the UN General Assembly emergency special session passed a resolution demanding an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between the conflicting parties and called for Israel to lift restrictions on humanitarian aid access to Gaza and end the blockade [1]

Core Viewpoint - The world's largest sovereign wealth fund, Norway's oil fund, has divested from Caterpillar and several Israeli banks due to ethical concerns related to their involvement in actions against Palestinian property and settlements [1][2]. Group 1: Divestment Actions - Norway's oil fund has completely sold its shares in Caterpillar, which accounted for 1.2% of the company, valued at $2.1 billion as of June [1]. - The fund has also reduced its holdings in five Israeli banks that finance settlement construction in the West Bank, decreasing the number of Israeli companies it holds from 61 to 33 [1][2]. - This divestment marks the first time the fund has sold non-Israeli companies due to their actions in Israel and Palestinian territories [2]. Group 2: Ethical Considerations - The divestment was based on recommendations from Norway's Council on Ethics, which advises on companies that violate international law [2]. - The Council stated that Caterpillar's products are being used to illegally destroy Palestinian property, constituting serious violations of international humanitarian law [3][4]. - The fund's actions reflect a response to public and political pressure regarding Israel's actions in Gaza [5]. Group 3: Political Implications - Some Norwegian officials express concerns about balancing public sentiment against Israel's actions with maintaining relations with the U.S., a strong supporter of Israel [5]. - There are fears that excessive divestment could lead to repercussions from U.S. states invoking anti-boycott laws, potentially impacting Norway and the fund [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint expressed by John Menadue is that Israel's objective is not merely to target Hamas, but to expel all Palestinians from their homes, framing the current conflict as a culmination of decades of systematic land takeover and ethnic cleansing [1] - Menadue argues that the recent conflict, which escalated on October 7, is a result of long-standing tensions and should not be viewed as a new issue, emphasizing that the Israeli government's actions have been a pretext for broader goals [1] - He supports the Australian government's recognition of Palestine at the upcoming UN General Assembly as a proper stance, criticizing Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu's response as unfounded [1] Group 2 - There is a growing skepticism among Australians towards the Trump administration, with approximately two-thirds of Australians losing confidence in the U.S. leadership under Trump, indicating a shift in public sentiment [2] - Menadue emphasizes that Australia's future lies within its own region rather than being aligned with Washington or London, suggesting a need for a reevaluation of Australia's foreign policy [3]

Group 1 - France has recently faced diplomatic criticism from multiple Western countries, including the US, Israel, and Italy, primarily regarding its policies on the Middle East peace process and European security issues [1] - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu accused President Macron of exacerbating anti-Semitism by recognizing the Palestinian state, expressing concern over the rise of anti-Semitism in France [3] - The French government has altered its stance on the Israel-Palestine issue, as evidenced by its request to close Israeli exhibitors' booths at the Paris Air Show due to their display of offensive weapons [3] Group 2 - The US Ambassador to France, Charles Kushner, supported Israel's criticism of France, claiming that France has not taken sufficient measures to curb anti-Jewish violence [5] - France's Foreign Ministry rejected the ambassador's accusations, stating they violate international law and undermine trust between allies [5] - Italy's Deputy Prime Minister Salvini mocked Macron's proposal to send troops to Ukraine, suggesting that Macron should go himself, which led to a diplomatic protest from France [6][7] Group 3 - The ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have highlighted divisions within Western politics, with France and other European nations attempting to assert independent voices and solutions [7] - The proposed "voluntary alliance" led by France and the UK is discussing troop deployment to Ukraine if a ceasefire is reached, but Italy has repeatedly declined invitations to participate [7]

Group 1 - Hamas has stated it will not disarm until an independent Palestinian state with full sovereignty is established, rejecting claims from U.S. officials that it is ready to disarm [1][2] - The call from 17 countries for Hamas to "lay down arms" reflects the difficulty of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and easing tensions in Gaza in the short term [2][3] - Hamas's core principles, as outlined in its 1988 and 2017 documents, emphasize armed struggle, making disarmament a significant challenge, especially under current military pressure [3] Group 2 - Disarming Hamas would threaten its leadership position in Gaza and jeopardize the livelihoods of thousands of public employees and armed personnel it represents [3] - The ongoing Israeli military actions in Gaza necessitate Hamas's role as a primary resistance force, complicating calls for disarmament [3] - There is a fundamental disagreement between Israel and Hamas regarding ceasefire terms, with Israel demanding more concessions from Hamas, while Hamas believes Israel should bear more responsibility [3]

Core Viewpoint - Egypt's Foreign Minister reaffirmed strong support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights, emphasizing Egypt's commitment to stand with them during critical times [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Efforts - Egypt aims to collaborate with the Palestinian government and the United Nations to host an international conference for the early recovery and reconstruction of Gaza following a ceasefire agreement [1] - The Egyptian Foreign Minister condemned Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank, labeling them as brutal aggression and violations of international law and humanitarian law [1] Group 2: Political Solutions - Egypt seeks a political resolution to the Palestinian issue through diplomatic efforts, aiming to establish an independent Palestinian state based on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital [1] - The Palestinian Foreign Minister praised Egypt's longstanding support for the Palestinian cause and acknowledged President Sisi's efforts to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people and promote a just resolution to their issues [1]