Group 1 - The case of Xiao Yi, a former executive manager of a state-owned enterprise, highlights severe violations of legal and ethical standards, including bribery and corruption [1][4] - Xiao Yi's actions included accepting gifts and entertainment from management and service objects, and using his position to facilitate project contracts and fund allocations in exchange for illegal benefits [4][5] - The disciplinary actions taken against Xiao Yi included expulsion from the Communist Party, removal from public office, and referral to the prosecution for criminal charges, reflecting the serious nature of his misconduct [4][2] Group 2 - The incident serves as a cautionary tale for other employees in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal and ethical standards to avoid severe consequences [1][4] - The educational approach taken by the local disciplinary committee, which involved direct exposure to the courtroom proceedings, aims to instill a stronger sense of accountability and awareness among employees [1]

根据"两高"《关于办理受贿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》"六、关于特定关系人'挂名'领取薪酬问 题"相关规定，"国家工作人员利用职务上的便利为请托人谋取利益，要求或者接受请托人以给特定关系 人安排工作为名，使特定关系人不实际工作却获取所谓薪酬的，以受贿论处"。若国家工作人员利用职 务便利为请托人谋取利益，特定关系人在请托人相关公司实际工作并领取薪酬，但领取的薪酬明显超出 同岗位其他人员发放标准的，对于超出的部分，能否认定为国家工作人员构成受贿，存在不同认识。 有这样一起案例。陆某甲，A市某国企党委书记、董事长；陆某乙、马某，分别系陆某甲之兄、嫂；司 某，A市B公司实际控制人；朱某，B公司执行总裁。2020年至2024年，陆某甲接受司某的请托，利用 职务上的便利，帮助B公司承揽其所在国企相关物业服务等项目。2020年7月，陆某甲和司某、朱某提 出其兄、嫂没有工作，欲安排进B公司工作，并提出让司某予以关照、多发薪酬。司某应允，并安排朱 某经办该事项，明确在工资待遇上给予二人优待。同月，陆某乙、马某进入B公司，陆某乙任B公司工 程专员，入职后薪酬待遇即按B公司工程主管标准发放；马某任B公司保洁员，薪酬待遇按保洁员 ...