受贿犯罪
Search documents
三堂会审丨准确认定违反廉洁纪律和受贿犯罪
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2026-01-07 02:40
中央纪委国家监委网站 方弈霏 编者按 工程建设领域资金密集、资源富集、环节众多,腐败问题易发多发。实践中,有的党员领导干部利用职权帮助亲属或特定关系人承揽工程项目,有的与不法 商人结成利益共同体,以合作投资项目名义获得"分红",还有的把项目审批权异化为以权谋私的工具向商人老板索贿,严重扰乱公平公正的市场秩序,损害 群众切身利益,必须以零容忍态度依规依纪依法严肃查处,正本清源。本期案例中,刘某某利用职权或者职务上的影响为特定关系人打招呼承接工程项目, 未从中收受好处,应怎样定性?刘某某要求请托人免除其妻子租赁的商铺租金,为何认定构成受贿?刘某某在办成请托事项收受好处后继续收受请托人所送 节礼,是否一并计入受贿数额?刘某某利用职务便利帮助他人承揽工程项目,在无实际出资和参与管理经营的情况下收受项目"分红",并将部分"分红"交由 行贿人保管,构成受贿未遂还是既遂?我们特邀相关单位工作人员予以解析。 刘旸 南京江北新区人民检察院第一检察部检察官助理 徐子敬 南京江北新区人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长 基本案情: 刘某某,男,2000年8月加入中国共产党,曾任A市B区管委会规划建设处处长、规划建设局局长,A市某园区党委书记, ...
辽宁省营口市政协原副主席段绪华被双开
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-19 14:22
段绪华严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉洁纪律、群众纪律、工作纪律,构成严重职务违法并涉嫌 受贿犯罪,且在党的十八大后不收敛、不收手,性质严重,影响恶劣,应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产 党纪律处分条例》《中华人民共和国监察法》《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》等有关规定,经 辽宁省纪委常委会会议研究并报辽宁省委批准,决定给予段绪华开除党籍处分;由辽宁省监委给予其开 除公职处分;收缴其违纪违法所得;将其涉嫌犯罪问题移送检察机关依法审查起诉,所涉财物一并移 送。 来源:中央纪委国家监委网站 转自:北京日报客户端 据辽宁省纪委监委消息:日前,经辽宁省委批准,辽宁省纪委监委对营口市政协原副主席段绪华严重违 纪违法问题进行了立案审查调查。 经查,段绪华丧失理想信念,背弃初心使命,对党不忠诚不老实,对抗组织审查;无视中央八项规定精 神,违规收受礼品礼金;违反组织原则,不按规定报告个人有关事项;低于市场价购买房产;向私营企 业主摊派费用,破坏营商环境;违规干预和插手市场经济活动,违规安排下属支付超标准公务招待费 用;纪法底线失守,利用职务上的便利为他人在企业经营等方面谋取利益,非法收受财物。 ...
中信银行资产管理业务中心原副总裁罗金辉一审被判十二年九个月
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-12-11 09:25
Core Points - The case involves the sentencing of Luo Jinhui, former Vice President of the Asset Management Business Center of CITIC Bank, for bribery, receiving a prison sentence of 12 years and 9 months along with a fine of 2 million RMB [1] - Luo Jinhui was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 44.37 million RMB from 2014 to 2020 while holding senior positions in various banks, including China Industrial Bank and Bank of Communications [3] - The court acknowledged Luo's confession and cooperation during the investigation, which contributed to a lighter sentence despite the significant amount of bribery [5] Company Summary - Luo Jinhui held key positions in major banks, including CITIC Bank, where he utilized his authority to facilitate financing and stock transactions for enterprises and individuals [3] - The court's decision reflects the legal consequences of corruption within the banking sector, emphasizing the importance of integrity in financial institutions [5] - The case highlights the potential risks associated with senior management positions in banks, where the misuse of power can lead to significant legal repercussions [3][5]
袁光宇,受贿数额特别巨大
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-12-11 06:48
转自:北京日报客户端 据最高人民检察院12月11日消息,中国海洋石油集团有限公司原党组成员、副总经理袁光宇涉嫌受贿一 案,由国家监察委员会调查终结,移送检察机关审查起诉。经最高人民检察院指定管辖,江苏省人民检 察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对袁光宇作出逮捕决定。 近日,江苏省徐州市人民检察院已向徐州市中级人民法院提起公诉。 检察机关起诉指控:被告人袁光宇利用担任中海石油北方钻井公司总经理,中海油田服务有限公司总经 理、总裁,中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司总经理,中国海洋石油渤海石油管理局局长,中国海 洋石油有限公司执行副总裁、总裁等职务上的便利,为有关单位和个人谋取利益,非法收受他人财物, 数额特别巨大,依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 无视中央八项规定精神,接受可能影响公正执行公务的打高尔夫球活动安排; 在职务晋升方面为他人谋取利益; 搞钱色交易,退休后违规从事与原任职务管辖业务相关的营利活动、违规任职; 毫无纪法底线,肆无忌惮"靠石油吃石油",大搞权钱交易,利用职务便利为他人在项目承揽、企业经营 等方面谋利,并非法收受巨额财物。 中央纪委国家监委表示,袁光宇严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉洁纪律和生活纪律,构 ...
三堂会审丨从严纠治违规接待 准确认定受贿犯罪
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-12-10 00:18
中央纪委国家监委网站 方弈霏 编者按 违规接待、大吃大喝是挥霍浪费国家和集体财物的典型表现,背离我们党艰苦奋斗的光荣传统和优良作风, 甚至容易由风及腐,必须从严监督、坚决纠治。本期案例中,郭某某作为A县B镇供销合作社理事会主任,是 否具有国家工作人员身份?该镇供销合作社违规超标准接待,郭某某对此负有直接责任,应如何定性?郭某 某收受他人财物后在案发前向单位退赃,如何计算其受贿数额?我们特邀相关单位工作人员予以解析。 特邀嘉宾 杜倩倩 安徽省肥西县纪委常委 刘丹 安徽省肥西县纪委监委案件审理室副主任 李梦微 安徽省肥西县人民检察院第二检察部主任 赵久涛 安徽省肥西县人民法院审委会委员、刑事审判庭员额法官 基本案情: 郭某某,2003年4月加入中国共产党,曾任某省A县B镇供销合作社理事会主任等职务。2022年,A县供销合 作社(事业单位,2005年后纳入参公管理事业单位)对B镇供销合作社进行清算过程中,发现郭某某在任职 图为安徽省肥西县纪委监委工作人员围绕案情进行研讨。魏晴雨 摄 期间履职尽责不到位,公私不分、账目混乱、财务制度执行不到位等,经研究决定撤销其职务,2023年9月 郭某某以职工身份退休。 违反中央八 ...
受贿11.08亿余元!白天辉被执行死刑
中国基金报· 2025-12-09 04:27
来源:人民日报客户端 原中国华融国际控股有限公司总经理白天辉被执行死刑 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 巅峰对话 投资热点说 ETF风向标 IPO情报站 fe o 1 ■ a a - 444 and 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND 开盘速递 港股日报 全球早班车 数说人物 √ � [ 8 a 4 a g a d 4 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND ●微信搜一搜( 〔 〔 中国基金报 〕即刻获取财经资讯 202 4 年 5 月 28 日, 天津市第二 中级人民法院以 受贿 罪判处 被告人白天辉 死刑,剥夺 政治权利终身,并处没收个人全部财产。 白天辉 上诉后, 天津市 高级人民法院 经开庭审 理,于 2025年2月24日 裁定驳回上诉,维持 原判 ,并 依法 报请最高人民法院核准。 最高人民法院经复核确认: 2014年至2018年,被告人白天辉利用担任华融(香港)国际控 股有限公司业务拓展三部负责人、总经理、投资银行部董事总经理,中国 华融国际 控股有限 公司资 ...
上海市委原常委朱芝松,被提起公诉
证券时报· 2025-11-11 05:02
Core Points - The article reports on the case of Zhu Zhison, a former member of the Shanghai Municipal Committee and former Secretary of the Pudong New Area Committee, who is suspected of bribery and has been arrested by the Supreme People's Procuratorate [1] Summary by Sections - Zhu Zhison's case has been investigated by the National Supervisory Commission and has been transferred to the procuratorial organs for review and prosecution [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has made an arrest decision against Zhu Zhison for suspected bribery and has designated the Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate to handle the case [1] - The Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution with the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court [1] - During the review and prosecution stage, the procuratorial organs informed Zhu Zhison of his litigation rights and conducted an interrogation, considering the opinions of his defense counsel [1] - The prosecution accuses Zhu Zhison of using his various official positions to seek benefits for others and illegally accepting substantial amounts of property, which is considered particularly large in scale [1]
青海省委原常委、政法委原书记杨发森受贿案一审宣判
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-10-29 09:18
Core Points - The court sentenced Yang Fasen, former member of the Qinghai Provincial Committee and Secretary of the Political and Legal Committee, to life imprisonment for bribery, confiscating all personal property and depriving him of political rights for life [1][3] - Yang Fasen was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 147 million RMB (approximately 21 million USD) from 2005 to 2024 while holding various governmental positions [3] Summary by Sections - **Judicial Outcome** - Yang Fasen received a life sentence for bribery, with all personal assets confiscated and political rights revoked for life [1] - The court acknowledged mitigating factors such as the attempted bribery and voluntary confession, leading to a lighter sentence [3] - **Bribery Details** - The total amount of bribes accepted by Yang Fasen was over 147 million RMB [3] - His positions allowed him to facilitate contracts and business operations for various enterprises and individuals [3] - **Court Proceedings** - The trial was held publicly on September 12, 2025, with evidence presented by the prosecution and defense [3] - Approximately 20 members of the public attended the court session [3]
受贿数额特别巨大,曹兴信一审获刑12年,当庭认罪
中国能源报· 2025-10-28 14:17
Core Points - The court sentenced Cao Xingxin, former deputy general manager of China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd., to 12 years in prison for bribery, along with a fine of 2 million RMB [1][3] - The total amount of bribes received by Cao Xingxin from 2005 to 2024 was over 26.75 million RMB, facilitated by his various official positions [3] - The court acknowledged mitigating circumstances, including Cao's confession, active restitution of the bribe, and the fact that some of the bribery acts were attempted but not completed [3] Summary by Sections - **Judicial Outcome** - Cao Xingxin was sentenced to 12 years in prison and fined 2 million RMB for bribery [1] - All illicit gains and their proceeds were ordered to be returned to the state treasury [1] - **Bribery Details** - From 2005 to 2024, Cao utilized his official positions to assist others in project contracting, job adjustments, and promotions, receiving bribes totaling over 26.75 million RMB [3] - The court classified the bribery amount as particularly large, warranting severe punishment [3] - **Court Proceedings** - The trial was held publicly on August 1, 2025, with evidence presented by the prosecution and statements made by both the defense and the defendant [3] - Cao expressed remorse and admitted guilt during the proceedings, which contributed to the court's decision for a lighter sentence [3]
三堂会审 | 违规从事营利活动与受贿犯罪相关问题分析
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-10-22 00:55
Core Points - The article discusses the case of Wang, a former official, who engaged in various corrupt activities, including providing intermediary services for private loans and accepting bribes, leading to his conviction for bribery and abuse of power [2][4][12]. Group 1: Case Background - Wang joined the Communist Party in December 1997 and held several positions, including Deputy Secretary of the C Town Party Committee and Deputy District Governor of E District [2]. - From December 2009 to September 2010, Wang provided intermediary services for private loan activities, earning a total of 250,000 RMB [2]. - Between 2003 and 2023, Wang illegally accepted over 8.29 million RMB in bribes while leveraging his official position [2]. Group 2: Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Wang's activities began on May 5, 2023, leading to his detention on May 17, 2023 [3]. - On November 10, 2023, Wang was expelled from the Party and removed from public office [4]. - The case was transferred to the People's Procuratorate for prosecution on November 13, 2023, and a public prosecution was initiated on December 27, 2023 [4]. Group 3: Legal Analysis of Corruption - The distinction between engaging in paid intermediary activities and bribery is emphasized, focusing on whether the official used their position to benefit others [7][8]. - Wang's actions were classified as a violation of discipline rather than bribery since he did not leverage his official capacity to benefit the parties involved in the loan transactions [8]. - Wang's acceptance of 1 million RMB disguised as "dividends" from a mining project was determined to be bribery, as he used his position to facilitate the arrangement [9][12]. Group 4: Financial Implications - Wang's acceptance of 620,000 RMB in cash from a relative, who was a private entrepreneur, was recognized as completed bribery, with an additional 4.59 million RMB in interest classified as criminal proceeds [13][15]. - The legal framework for determining the nature of Wang's financial transactions is discussed, highlighting the importance of actual control over the funds received [15][17].