r problem V Aliana 11 / , w " " " " " / 13- St Prix ବହାର ବହୁ the first 0000000 24 桂林市中级人民法院认为，被告人刘星泰的行为构成受贿罪，应依法惩处。刘星泰受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失。鉴于刘星泰 受贿犯罪中有未遂情节；归案后如实供述自己的罪行，主动交代监察机关尚未掌握的绝大部分犯罪事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，涉案赃款赃物及孳息已全部 追缴到案；检举揭发他人重大犯罪经查属实，有重大立功表现，具有法定、酌定从轻处罚情节，依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 2025年8月26日，广西壮族自治区桂林市中级人民法院一审公开宣判海南省人大常委会原党组副书记、副主任刘星泰受贿案，对被告人刘星泰以受贿罪判处 死刑，缓期二年执行，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；对其受贿所得财物及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 经审理查明：2003年至2024年，被告人刘星泰利用担任山东省无棣县委副书记、县长，无棣县委书记，山东省委组织部副部长，山东省机构编制委员会办公 室主任，山东省日照市委副书记、市长，日照市委书记，海南省委常 ...

经审理查明：2005年至2024年，被告人楼文龙利用担任原中国银行业监督管理委员会银行监管二部副主任、主任，原中国银行业监督管理委员会北京监管局党委书 记、局长，中国农业银行党委委员、副行长等职务上的便利以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件，为有关单位和个人在监管审批、入股城市商业银行、融资贷款、工 程承揽等事项上提供帮助，直接或者通过他人非法收受上述单位和个人给予的财物，共计折合人民币8451万余元。 泉州市中级人民法院认为，被告人楼文龙的行为构成受贿罪，受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失，应依法惩处。鉴于其受贿犯罪中有未遂 情节，到案后如实供述罪行，主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的大部分受贿事实，认罪悔罪，积极退赃，赃款赃物及孳息已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定从轻处罚情节， 依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 2025年8月25日，福建省泉州市中级人民法院一审公开宣判中国农业银行原党委委员、副行长楼文龙受贿案，对被告人楼文龙以受贿罪判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权 利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；对楼文龙受贿所得及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 据悉，泉州市中级人民法院于2025年6月6日公开开庭审理了该案。 ...

来源：央视新闻 政事儿 受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失，楼文龙被判无期！ 8月25日，福建省泉州市中级人民法院一审公开宣判中国农业银行原党委委员、副行长楼文龙受贿案， 对被告人楼文龙以受贿罪判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产 ；对楼文龙受贿 所得及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 机关尚未掌握的大部分受贿事实，认罪悔罪，积极退赃，赃款赃物及孳息已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定 从轻处罚情节，依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 据悉，泉州市中级人民法院于2025年6月6日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中，检察机关出示了相关证据， 被告人楼文龙及其辩护人进行了质证，控辩双方在法庭的主持下充分发表了意见，楼文龙进行了最后陈 述，并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众30余人旁听了庭审。 2024年5月16日消息，楼文龙被查；11月20日消息，楼文龙被开除党籍。 经查，楼文龙丧失理想信念，背离初心使命，处心积虑对抗组织审查；违反中央八项规定精 神，违规参加用公款支付的宴请，接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请；不如实报告个人有关 事项，在职务晋升等方面为他人谋取利益；违规收受礼品礼金 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities surrounding the criminalization of state officials profiting from directed share placements, emphasizing the need for thorough investigations focusing on the nature of the transactions and the motivations behind them [1][5][11]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Wang, a former state-owned enterprise leader, and Li, the actual controller of a private investment company, developed a relationship that led to Wang facilitating Li's access to share placements [2][3]. - In 2014, Wang used his position to allocate shares from a state-owned company to Li's firm, which had previously been denied access [2]. Disputed Opinions - There are differing views on whether Wang's actions constitute bribery, with some arguing that the investment was a normal business opportunity, while others assert it was a clear case of bribery due to the nature of the transaction [5][6][11]. Analysis of Opinions - The article argues that the relationship between Wang and Li was not a legitimate market transaction but rather a form of power-for-money exchange, as Wang's actions were influenced by his official capacity [8][9][10]. - Wang's acquisition of shares was characterized by a lack of market risk, as Li guaranteed profits, which deviates from typical investment behavior [10][12]. Determining Bribery Amount - The article suggests that the total profit Wang received should be considered as the bribe amount, as it was a direct result of the power-for-money transaction [11][12]. - It emphasizes that the nature of the shares acquired by Wang was such that they were not typically accessible to ordinary investors, reinforcing the argument of an improper exchange [12][15][16].

Group 1 - The case of Xiao Yi, a former executive manager of a state-owned enterprise, highlights severe violations of legal and ethical standards, including bribery and corruption [1][4] - Xiao Yi's actions included accepting gifts and entertainment from management and service objects, and using his position to facilitate project contracts and fund allocations in exchange for illegal benefits [4][5] - The disciplinary actions taken against Xiao Yi included expulsion from the Communist Party, removal from public office, and referral to the prosecution for criminal charges, reflecting the serious nature of his misconduct [4][2] Group 2 - The incident serves as a cautionary tale for other employees in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal and ethical standards to avoid severe consequences [1][4] - The educational approach taken by the local disciplinary committee, which involved direct exposure to the courtroom proceedings, aims to instill a stronger sense of accountability and awareness among employees [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the sentencing of Qin Rupai, a former high-ranking official in Guangxi, to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery, highlighting the severity of corruption in government positions [1][2] - The court found that from 1998 to 2024, Qin Rupai illegally accepted bribes totaling over 216 million RMB, leveraging his various official positions to facilitate projects and business operations for others [1][2] - The court acknowledged mitigating factors such as Qin's confession, cooperation with authorities, and the return of most of the illicit gains, which influenced the decision to suspend the death sentence [2]

Core Points - The court sentenced Zhou Congqi, former deputy director of the Guizhou Provincial Water Resources Department, to 13 years in prison for accepting bribes totaling over 72.29 million yuan from 2005 to 2023 [1][2] - Zhou utilized his positions to facilitate approvals for mining rights and other business matters in exchange for illegal financial benefits [1][2] Group 1: Case Details - Zhou Congqi was found guilty of accepting bribes amounting to 72.29 million yuan, with some funds not actually received [1] - The court recognized Zhou's actions as particularly egregious due to the substantial amount involved and the nature of his offenses [1] - Factors such as partial attempted crimes, truthful confession, and active restitution contributed to a lighter sentence [1] Group 2: Background and Context - Zhou served as deputy director of the Guizhou Provincial Land and Resources Department for 15 years, where he exploited his authority for personal gain [2] - The approval of mining rights was a routine administrative function that became a significant issue for illegal mining operators seeking to bypass regulations [2] - A specific case involved businessman Wang, who invested in Zhou's family-owned liquor factory as a means to secure mining rights, transferring a total of 2.4 million yuan for this purpose [2]

Core Point - The case involves the sentencing of Zhou Congqi, former deputy director of the Guizhou Provincial Water Resources Department, for accepting bribes totaling over 72.29 million yuan from 2005 to 2023 [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Legal Proceedings - The court sentenced Zhou Congqi to 13 years in prison and imposed a fine of 2 million yuan for bribery [1] - The court ordered the confiscation of the bribe proceeds and their interest, which will be turned over to the national treasury [1] Bribery Details - Zhou Congqi utilized his positions in the Guizhou Provincial Land and Resources Department and the Water Resources Department to facilitate approvals for mining rights, land use rights, and company operations [1] - The total amount of bribes received was over 72.29 million yuan, with some of the amounts not actually obtained [1] Mitigating Factors - The court acknowledged that some of Zhou's criminal acts were attempted but not completed [1] - Zhou provided truthful confessions and actively reported on other criminal activities, which were verified as true, demonstrating a degree of cooperation with law enforcement [1] - His remorse and proactive return of illicit gains were considered as mitigating factors in the sentencing [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case of Zhao Jinyun, former Vice Governor of Gansu Province, involves serious allegations of bribery and insider trading, leading to her prosecution by the Tianjin Second Intermediate People's Court after investigations by the National Supervisory Commission and local police [1][3][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Charges - Zhao Jinyun is accused of using her various official positions to illegally accept significant amounts of money and benefits, constituting a serious violation of duty and suspected bribery [3][4]. - The charges include insider trading, where Zhao, as an insider, bought securities before the public disclosure of information that could significantly affect their trading prices [3][4]. Group 2: Background and Career - Zhao Jinyun, born in October 1965, holds a master's degree in science and has served in various significant roles, including Vice Governor of Gansu Province and positions in the Gansu Provincial Land and Resources Department [4][5]. - Her career includes leadership roles in the Gansu Provincial Committee of the Jiusan Society and the Gansu Airport Group, showcasing her extensive involvement in public service and governance [4].

Group 1 - The case involves Qi Tongsheng, former Secretary of the Party Leadership Group and Chairman of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Political Consultative Conference, who is suspected of bribery [1] - The investigation was concluded by the National Supervisory Commission and the case has been transferred to the Nanning People's Procuratorate for prosecution [1] - Qi is accused of using his positions to facilitate benefits for others and illegally accepting substantial amounts of money and property [1]