Workflow
受贿犯罪
icon
Search documents
上海市委原常委朱芝松,被提起公诉
证券时报· 2025-11-11 05:02
Core Points - The article reports on the case of Zhu Zhison, a former member of the Shanghai Municipal Committee and former Secretary of the Pudong New Area Committee, who is suspected of bribery and has been arrested by the Supreme People's Procuratorate [1] Summary by Sections - Zhu Zhison's case has been investigated by the National Supervisory Commission and has been transferred to the procuratorial organs for review and prosecution [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has made an arrest decision against Zhu Zhison for suspected bribery and has designated the Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate to handle the case [1] - The Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution with the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court [1] - During the review and prosecution stage, the procuratorial organs informed Zhu Zhison of his litigation rights and conducted an interrogation, considering the opinions of his defense counsel [1] - The prosecution accuses Zhu Zhison of using his various official positions to seek benefits for others and illegally accepting substantial amounts of property, which is considered particularly large in scale [1]
青海省委原常委、政法委原书记杨发森受贿案一审宣判
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-10-29 09:18
央视网消息:据最高法微信公众号消息,2025年10月29日,陕西省汉中市中级人民法院一审公开宣判青海省委原常委、政法委原书记杨发森受贿案,对 被告人杨发森以受贿罪判处无期徒刑,剥夺政治权利终身,并处没收个人全部财产。对杨发森犯罪所得财物依法予以追缴,上缴国库。 汉中市中级人民法院认为,被告人杨发森的行为构成受贿罪,数额特别巨大,应依法惩处。鉴于杨发森受贿犯罪中有未遂情节,自动投案后主动交代了办案 机关尚未掌握的大部分受贿事实,犯罪所得财物已全部追缴,依法可予从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 据悉,汉中市中级人民法院于2025年9月12日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中,检察机关出示了相关证据,被告人杨发森及其辩护人进行了质证,控辩双方在 法庭的主持下充分发表了意见,杨发森进行了最后陈述。社会各界群众近20人旁听了庭审。 经审理查明:2005年3月至2024年7月,被告人杨发森利用担任新疆维吾尔自治区阿克苏地区阿克苏市依干其乡党委书记,阿克苏市委常委、副市长,阿克苏 市委副书记,拜城县委书记,库车县委书记,和田地委书记,新疆维吾尔自治区政府副主席,新疆维吾尔自治区党委常委、乌鲁木齐市委书记,青海省委常 委、政法委书记等 ...
受贿数额特别巨大,曹兴信一审获刑12年,当庭认罪
中国能源报· 2025-10-28 14:17
Core Points - The court sentenced Cao Xingxin, former deputy general manager of China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd., to 12 years in prison for bribery, along with a fine of 2 million RMB [1][3] - The total amount of bribes received by Cao Xingxin from 2005 to 2024 was over 26.75 million RMB, facilitated by his various official positions [3] - The court acknowledged mitigating circumstances, including Cao's confession, active restitution of the bribe, and the fact that some of the bribery acts were attempted but not completed [3] Summary by Sections - **Judicial Outcome** - Cao Xingxin was sentenced to 12 years in prison and fined 2 million RMB for bribery [1] - All illicit gains and their proceeds were ordered to be returned to the state treasury [1] - **Bribery Details** - From 2005 to 2024, Cao utilized his official positions to assist others in project contracting, job adjustments, and promotions, receiving bribes totaling over 26.75 million RMB [3] - The court classified the bribery amount as particularly large, warranting severe punishment [3] - **Court Proceedings** - The trial was held publicly on August 1, 2025, with evidence presented by the prosecution and statements made by both the defense and the defendant [3] - Cao expressed remorse and admitted guilt during the proceedings, which contributed to the court's decision for a lighter sentence [3]
三堂会审 | 违规从事营利活动与受贿犯罪相关问题分析
Core Points - The article discusses the case of Wang, a former official, who engaged in various corrupt activities, including providing intermediary services for private loans and accepting bribes, leading to his conviction for bribery and abuse of power [2][4][12]. Group 1: Case Background - Wang joined the Communist Party in December 1997 and held several positions, including Deputy Secretary of the C Town Party Committee and Deputy District Governor of E District [2]. - From December 2009 to September 2010, Wang provided intermediary services for private loan activities, earning a total of 250,000 RMB [2]. - Between 2003 and 2023, Wang illegally accepted over 8.29 million RMB in bribes while leveraging his official position [2]. Group 2: Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Wang's activities began on May 5, 2023, leading to his detention on May 17, 2023 [3]. - On November 10, 2023, Wang was expelled from the Party and removed from public office [4]. - The case was transferred to the People's Procuratorate for prosecution on November 13, 2023, and a public prosecution was initiated on December 27, 2023 [4]. Group 3: Legal Analysis of Corruption - The distinction between engaging in paid intermediary activities and bribery is emphasized, focusing on whether the official used their position to benefit others [7][8]. - Wang's actions were classified as a violation of discipline rather than bribery since he did not leverage his official capacity to benefit the parties involved in the loan transactions [8]. - Wang's acceptance of 1 million RMB disguised as "dividends" from a mining project was determined to be bribery, as he used his position to facilitate the arrangement [9][12]. Group 4: Financial Implications - Wang's acceptance of 620,000 RMB in cash from a relative, who was a private entrepreneur, was recognized as completed bribery, with an additional 4.59 million RMB in interest classified as criminal proceeds [13][15]. - The legal framework for determining the nature of Wang's financial transactions is discussed, highlighting the importance of actual control over the funds received [15][17].
三堂会审丨准确认定违反廉洁纪律与受贿犯罪
Core Viewpoint - The case of Luo, a former public official, highlights the distinction between legitimate civil actions and violations of integrity discipline, particularly in the context of private lending and potential bribery [1][9][10]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Luo, a member of the Communist Party since June 1994, held various positions including Chairman of the City Investment Company and Director of the Planning Bureau. He was found to have violated integrity discipline by lending money to management and service objects, resulting in significant profits [3]. - Between 2016 and 2018, Luo lent a total of 345 million yuan, receiving 13 million yuan in interest, while also being implicated in accepting bribes totaling over 606 million yuan during his tenure [3]. Investigation Process - The investigation into Luo's alleged serious violations began on October 22, 2024, leading to his detention and subsequent extension of detention time [4]. - On April 10, 2025, the case was transferred to the People's Procuratorate for prosecution, and Luo was expelled from the Party and public office shortly thereafter [5]. Legal Proceedings - On May 19, 2025, the People's Procuratorate filed charges against Luo for bribery, resulting in a sentence of ten years and one month in prison, along with a fine of 500,000 yuan [6]. Analysis of Private Lending - The analysis indicates that Luo's private lending activities, while profitable, did not constitute bribery as there was no evidence of using his official position to benefit the borrowers [9][10]. - The determination of whether such lending constitutes a violation of integrity discipline hinges on the potential impact on the impartial execution of public duties [10]. Recognition of Bribery in Lending - In a separate case involving a businessman named Peng, it was established that the loan provided by Luo was not based on a genuine need, indicating a potential bribery scenario masked as a loan [12][13]. - The relationship between the loan and the official's actions was scrutinized, revealing that the loan was a means to facilitate a quid pro quo arrangement [14][15]. Discounted Housing Transactions - Luo's purchase of property at a significantly reduced price from a developer was analyzed to determine if it constituted bribery. The sale price was 38% lower than the market rate, indicating a potential violation of integrity [17][19]. - The transaction was deemed a form of bribery as it was not a standard market practice and was directly linked to Luo's official actions [19]. Self-Reporting and Sentencing - Although Luo provided information about his bribery activities, it did not meet the legal criteria for self-reporting due to the nature of the crimes being similar to those already known to the authorities [21][22]. - His cooperation was acknowledged, leading to a lighter sentence despite not qualifying for self-reporting [22].
受贿4.49亿元!副部级“老虎”王波一审被判死缓
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-14 09:29
记者 辛圆 据人民日报客户端消息,2025年10月14日,湖北省宜昌市中级人民法院一审公开宣判内蒙古自治区人大常委会原党组副书记、副主任王波受贿一案,对被告 人王波以受贿罪判处死刑,缓期二年执行,剥夺政治权利终身,并处没收个人全部财产,在其死刑缓期执行二年期满依法减为无期徒刑后,终身监禁,不得 减刑、假释;对追缴在案的王波犯罪所得财物及孳息依法上缴国库,不足部分继续追缴。 经审理查明:2003年上半年至2024年5月,被告人王波利用担任内蒙古自治区赤峰市委常委、副市长兼市城市基础设施投资开发有限公司董事长,赤峰市委 副书记兼市城市基础设施投资开发有限公司董事长,包头市委常委、副市长,巴彦淖尔市委副书记、市长,呼和浩特市委副书记、市长,内蒙古自治区政府 党组成员、副主席,内蒙古自治区人大常委会党组副书记、副主任等职务上的便利,以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件,通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行 为,为有关单位和个人在企业经营、工程承揽、职务调整等事项上提供帮助,收受上述单位和个人所送财物共计折合人民币4.49亿余元。 宜昌市中级人民法院认为,被告人王波的行为构成受贿罪,其受贿数额特别巨大,犯罪情节特别严重,社会影响特 ...
金融监管总局行政处罚局原负责人王柱:受贿逾3376万元,一审获刑12年6个月
Feng Huang Wang· 2025-10-13 12:04
Core Points - Wang Zhu, former head of the Administrative Penalty Bureau of the Financial Regulatory Administration, was sentenced to 12 years and 6 months in prison for bribery, involving over 33.76 million yuan [1][2][3] Group 1: Background and Context - Wang Zhu has over 20 years of experience in financial regulation, having held positions in various regulatory bodies across multiple provinces [1] - He was investigated for serious violations of discipline and law, including accepting gifts and engaging in activities that compromised his official duties [1][2] Group 2: Details of the Bribery Case - From 2002 to 2023, Wang utilized his position to facilitate benefits for individuals and entities in areas such as loan financing and business operations, receiving various forms of bribes including stocks and cash [2][3] - The total amount of bribes received by Wang was approximately 33.76 million yuan, with the largest single bribe being 17.98 million yuan in the form of stocks from a company in 2020 [3] - Wang also received 757.97 million yuan through profit-sharing arrangements involving a relative, leveraging his regulatory authority to benefit that relative [4]
唐仁健,死缓!
中国基金报· 2025-09-28 10:16
Core Points - The article discusses the sentencing of Tang Rinjian, former Minister of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, who was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery, involving over 268 million RMB [2][4]. - The court found that Tang abused his official positions from 2007 to 2024 to accept bribes, significantly harming national and public interests [4][6]. - The case highlights severe violations of party discipline and law, leading to his expulsion from the party and public office [7]. Summary by Sections - **Judicial Outcome**: Tang Rinjian was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve, stripped of political rights for life, and ordered to forfeit all personal assets [2][4]. - **Bribery Details**: From 2007 to 2024, Tang utilized his various official roles to facilitate benefits for individuals and entities, receiving bribes totaling over 268 million RMB [4][6]. - **Court Proceedings**: The trial included evidence presentation by the prosecution, with Tang admitting guilt and expressing remorse during the proceedings [5]. - **Disciplinary Actions**: Tang was expelled from the Communist Party and removed from public office due to serious violations of political and organizational discipline [7]. - **Career Background**: Tang held several significant positions, including Deputy Director of the Central Financial Leading Group Office and Minister of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, before his investigation [6][7].
管庆良案,判了!当县长,他想方设法架空县委书记,当书记后又想方设法架空县长
中国基金报· 2025-09-27 16:14
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conviction of Guan Qingliang, former secretary of the Xiu Wen County Committee, for bribery, highlighting the severity of his actions and the legal consequences he faced [1][3][6]. Summary by Sections Case Details - Guan Qingliang was sentenced to 11 years and 3 months in prison and fined 1.3 million RMB for accepting bribes totaling over 29.8 million RMB from 2014 to 2024 [1][3]. - The court found that Guan used his official positions to gain benefits for individuals and entities in project contracting and fund disbursement [3][6]. Misconduct and Violations - During his tenure, Guan publicly opposed anti-corruption efforts and undermined democratic centralism, consolidating power for personal gain [4][5]. - He engaged in corrupt practices, including using his sister as a proxy to hide illicit business activities and assets [4][5]. Disciplinary Actions - Guan was expelled from the party and public office due to severe violations of political, organizational, and ethical disciplines, as well as for engaging in corrupt activities post-18th National Congress [5][6]. - His actions included accepting gifts, misappropriating project funds, and failing to report significant matters as required [5][6]. Background Information - Guan Qingliang, born in November 1979, held various positions in the Bijie region before being appointed as the secretary of the Xiu Wen County Committee in 2021 [6].
马丰胜被提起公诉!
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-09-23 02:13
Core Points - The case of Ma Fengsheng, former Vice Chairman of the Qinghai Provincial Political Consultative Conference, has been concluded by the National Supervisory Commission and transferred to the prosecution for review and indictment [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has made an arrest decision against Ma Fengsheng for suspected bribery, designating the Lanzhou People's Procuratorate in Gansu Province to handle the case [1] - The Lanzhou People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution with the Lanzhou Intermediate People's Court [1] Summary by Sections - **Investigation and Prosecution** - The investigation into Ma Fengsheng's alleged bribery has been completed and sent to the prosecution for further action [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has formally arrested Ma Fengsheng on charges of bribery [1] - **Charges and Allegations** - Ma Fengsheng is accused of using his positions, including Deputy Secretary and County Head of Xunhua County, Deputy Commissioner of Haidong Prefecture, and other roles, to facilitate illegal benefits for others [1] - The prosecution alleges that he accepted bribes amounting to a particularly large sum, warranting criminal responsibility under bribery laws [1]